| Literature DB >> 32587152 |
Fairooz P Manjandavida1, Santosh G Honavar2, Usha Kim3, Usha Singh4, Vikas Menon5, Sima Das6, Swathi Kaliki7, Mahesh Shanmugam Palanivelu8, Vikas Khetan9, Parag K Shah10, Pukhraj Rishi9, Kaustubh Mulay11, Arpan Gandhi12, B M Vadhiraja13, Vijay Anand Reddy14, Sunil Bhat15, Vasudha Rao16.
Abstract
The outbreak of rapidly spreading COVID-19 pandemic in December 2019 has witnessed a major transformation in the health care system worldwide. This has led to the re-organization of the specialty services for the effective utilization of available resources and ensuring the safety of patients and healthcare workers. Suspension of oncology services will have major implications on cancer care due to delayed diagnosis and treatment leading to irreversible adverse consequences. Therefore various oncology organizations have called for a continuation of cancer care during this crisis with diligence. The COVID-19 pandemic has forced the clinicians to transform the components of care from screening to outpatient care and primary management. The purpose of this article is to establish guidelines and recommendations for ocular oncology in the management of ocular tumors set by a multidisciplinary team of experts including ocular, medical and radiation oncologists, and pathologists. As the pandemic is evolving fast, it will require constant updates and reformation of health strategies and guidelines for safe and quality health care.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; COVID-19 guidelines; ocular malignancies; ocular oncology; ocular tumors
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32587152 PMCID: PMC7574098 DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1669_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Ophthalmol ISSN: 0301-4738 Impact factor: 1.848
Figure 1Flow chart showing the triage- 'Quad triage' at 4 levels, for the ocular oncology services during the COVID-19 pandemic
Intraocular tumors-disease specific guidelines for ocular oncology services during SARS-Cov-2/COVID-19 pandemic
| Ocular Tumors | Standard of Care | COVID-19 guidelines | Challenges | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diagnosis | Grouping/staging | No change in diagnostic modalities of newly diagnosed cases for grouping and staging | Risks of COVID-19 transmission | Patient and health care worker protection |
| Primary management | Systemic chemotherapy | Not delayed | High risk for COVID-19 | Defer EUA during initial 2-3 cycles of chemotherapy |
| Focal adjuvant treatment | Cryotherapy | Local therapy as indicated | High risk for COVID-19 | Patient and health care worker protection |
| Follow-up | EUA | Screening in familial RB not to be delayed | Risks of disease transmission | Strict follow-up |
| Radiological imaging | Surveillance MRI | Can be delayed for 3 to 4 months | Pinealoblastoma screening Postenucleation | If symptomatic, consider urgent |
| Genetic testing | Gene analysis of patient and parent | Defer until after pandemic | Visit to geneticist | Will not influence initial management |
| Diagnosis | Ultrasonography/OCT | No change/delay in diagnostic and systemic screening protocols | Patients often>65 years and high risk for COVID-19 | Basic work-up can be done locally before referral for primary management |
| Primary | Plaque brachytherapy | No delay in management | Surgery done under general anaesthesia. | Patient and health care worker protection as per guidelines in the clinic and operation theatre |
| Follow-up | Clinical evaluation | Postenucleation follow-up locally | Frequent hospital visits and risks involved | Postenucleation, observation in patients >65 years Post-plaque evaluation delayed to 6 weeks |
| Genetic testing | Gene analysis during primary management. | Performed during primary management with enucleation/plaque brachytherpay | FNAB specimens sent in sealed double pack container | Inform the pathologist prior |
| Diagnosis | Serological investigations | No change/delay in diagnostics or systemic evaluation | Patients on chemotherapy is at high risk for multiple hospital visits | Patient and health care worker protection as per guidelines in the clinic and operation theatre |
| Primary management | Intravitreal injections | Intravitreal injection involves frequent hospital visits | Multiple injections required | Treatment should be strategically planned |
| Follow up | Clinical evaluation | If disease stable>6 months posttreatment, visits delayed for 3 months | Detection of recurrence | Regular follow up locally Telementoring |
| Diagnosis | USGB scan/OCT | Avoid FFA/ICG | Risks associated with the procedure | |
| Treatment | Laser Intraocular injections | Delayed if no vision threatening symptoms. | Disease progression and complications | Patient counselling regarding alarming symptoms for urgent care |
EUA – Examination under anesthesia; MRI – Magnetic resonance imaging; CT – Computerized tomography; BM – Bone marrow; OCT – Optical coherence tomography; FNAB – Fine needle aspiration biopsy; LP – Lumbar puncture; OPD – Out patient department; FNAB – Fine needle aspiration biopsy; LA – Local anesthesia
Orbital tumors-disease specific guidelines for ocular oncology services during SARS-Cov-2/COVID-19 pandemic
| Ocular Tumors | Standard of Care | COVID-19 guidelines | Challenges | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diagnosis | CT-scan/MRI | No delay in diagnosis and evaluation | Risks of COVID-19 transmission | Patient and health care worker protection as per guidelines in the clinic and operation theatre |
| Primary management | Orbitotomy, excision biopsy | Not delayed and performed as indicated | Surgical aerosol generation Long duration of surgery | Operation theatre safety guidelines strictly followed |
| Stereotactic radiotherapy | Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy | Frequent hospital visits, less when compared to conventional radiotherapy | Lesser treatment duration | |
| Chemotherapy | No change in standard protocols | Associated risk in older patients and children | Professionally monitored personal protection | |
| Follow-up | Clinical evaluation | Posttreatment can be delayed by 4 to 6 weeks. | Postsurgical complications | Not delayed if vision threatening |
| Radiological assessment | Delayed for 3 months if clinically stable | Do not delay in aggressive high grade malignancy | Screening for recurrence | |
| Diagnosis | Clinical evaluation | Evaluation of vision and risks of visual compromise | Orbital lymphoma, even high grade can initially present as benign or inflammatory condition | Thorough assessment of history, symptoms and vision |
| Primary management | Orbitotomy and excision biopsy | Delayed if no vision threatening symptoms secondary to optic nerve compression, diplopia, and exposure keratopathy | Regular follow up | Patient counselling regarding alarming symptoms for urgent care |
CT- Computerised tomography; MRI - Magnetic resonance imaging; PET- Positron emission tomography
Eyelid tumors-disease specific guidelines for ocular oncology services during SARS-Cov-2/COVID-19 pandemic
| Ocular Tumors | Standard of Care | COVID-19 guidelines | Challenges | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diagnosis | Clinical evaluation | No delay in diagnosis | Risks of COVID-19 transmission | Patient and health care worker protection as per guidelines in the clinic and operation theatre |
| Primary | Surgical excision with margin clearance | No delay in the management of malignant eyelid lid tumorsAvoid 2 staged eyelid reconstructive procedure | Surgical exposure to aerosols | Operation theatre safety guidelines strictly followed. |
| Chemoradiation | No delay if indicated | Associated risk in older patients | Professionally monitored personal protection. | |
| Sentinal lymph node biopsy | Delayed by 4 to 6 weeks | Procedure associated risks | Performed by head and neck surgeon | |
| Follow-up | Clinical evaluation | Post-operative delayed for 4 to 6 weeks | Post-surgical complications | Transfer of care locally |
| Diagnosis | Clinical examination/Teleophthalmology | Confirm the diagnosis | Malignant lesions can mimic benign or inflammatory eyelid lesion | Look for alarming signs |
| Primary management | Observation | Surgery delayed until and after the pandemic | Cosmetic concern of patient | Patient counseling regarding risks vs benefits |
CT – Computerized tomography; MRI – Magnetic resonance imaging
Conjunctival Tumors-Disease specific guidelines for ocular oncology services during SARS-Cov-2/COVID-19 pandemic
| Ocular Tumors | Standard of Care | COVID-19 guidelines | Challenges | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diagnosis | Clinical evaluation | No delay in investigations or evaluation | Risks of COVID-19 transmission Common in patients >65 years | Patient and health care worker protection as per guidelines in the clinics |
| Primary management | Surgical excision + | Excision biopsy planned as per indications Plan according to local logistics. | Avoids frequent hospital/pharmacy visits | Operation theatre safety guidelines strictly followed |
| Topical therapy chemotherapy/immunotherapy | Topical treatment in COVID-19 suspect | Frequent hospital/pharmacy visits | Patient safety | |
| Plaque brachytherapy | No delay in primary plaque brachytherapy | Surgical exposure to aerosols | Radiation safety guidelines followed | |
| Sentinal lymph node biopsy | Delayed by 4 to 6 weeks | Procedure associated risks | Performed by head and neck surgeon | |
| Follow up | Clinical evaluation | Posttreatment delayed by 4 to 6 weeks. | Subtle recurrences can go unnoticed with images during teleophthalmology | Ensure high quality images Suspicious signs require clinical evaluation |
| Diagnosis | Clinical evaluation | Confirm the diagnosis | Differentiate benign from malignant lesions Avoid misdiagnosis especially in teleophthalmology | Look for alarming signs Review with ophthalmologists locally |
| Primary management | Observation Surgical excision | Surgery delayed until and after the pandemic. | Cosmetic concern of patient | Patient counseling regarding risks vs benefits |
AS-OCT - Anterior segment optical coherence tomography; UBM - Ultrasound biomicroscopy