Literature DB >> 32586871

Draft Genome Sequence of Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum Bif4, Isolated from Healthy Infant Feces.

Atul Munish Chander1, Shashank Singh1, Shikha Sharma1, Vasvi Chaudhry2, Sivasubramanian Rajarammohan1, Shrikant Subhash Mantri1, Mahendra Bishnoi1, Sanjay Kumar Bhadada3, Kanthi Kiran Kondepudi4.   

Abstract

We report the 2.24-Mb draft genome sequence of Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum Bif4, isolated from a fecal sample from a healthy infant. The specific annotations revealed genes predictive of its probiotic attributes.
Copyright © 2020 Chander et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32586871      PMCID: PMC7317108          DOI: 10.1128/MRA.00561-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc        ISSN: 2576-098X


ANNOUNCEMENT

Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum Bif4, which has an ability to reduce lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation in murine macrophages, was isolated from a fecal sample from a healthy infant. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER) in Chandigarh, India. The fecal sample was collected from the infant after an informed consent form was signed by the parent. The sample was homogenized in sterile phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.05% l-cysteine (pH 7.4, 0.0018 M), serially diluted, and spread onto De Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe agar plates containing filter-sterilized 0.05% (wt/vol) each of l-cysteine hydrochloride (MRSC) and 0.05% mupirocin (Hi-Media, India) (1) followed by incubation at 37°C for 48 h under obligate anaerobic conditions (80% N2 + 10% CO2 + 10% H2) using an Anoxomat culture system (Mart, Lichtenvoorde, Netherlands). A single colony of the strain was subcultured three times on MRSC agar plates every 48 hours. Genomic DNA was extracted from 24-hour-grown culture on MRSC agar plates using a ZR fungal/bacterial DNA miniprep kit as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Genomic DNA (1.0 μg) was used as input material for library preparation. The sequencing library was generated using a TruSeq Nano DNA high-throughput sample preparation kit (Illumina, USA) following the manufacturer’s recommendations. The genomic DNA was randomly fragmented to a size of 350 bp using Covaris cracker, and DNA fragments were then end polished, A tailed, and ligated with the full-length adapter for Illumina sequencing with further PCR amplification. The amplicons obtained were purified (AMPure XP system, Beckman Coulter), and libraries were analyzed for size distribution using an Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer and quantified using real-time PCR. Paired-end sequencing was performed using an SBS kit v4 on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 sequencing platform. Default parameters for all software were used in this study unless otherwise specified. Before assembly, raw data were passed into Trimmomatic v0.36 for trimming adapters, low-quality bases, and stretches of sequence ambiguities (N, bases that cannot be determined) using a sliding window filter. Thus, reads containing adapters, reads containing >10% N, and reads containing low-quality bases (Q score, ≤5) were removed, which was over 50% of the total bases. Genome assembly was performed with CLC Genomics Workbench (CLC NGS Cell v2018). The total number of reads was 32,738,540 with an average read length of 141.21 bp; of these, 31,890,222 reads were in pairs with an average read length of 339.68 bp. The assembled genome was 2,214,245 bp long with a GC content of 56.50%. The assembled genome contained 58 contigs with an N50 value of 272,576 bp, L50 of 4, and genome coverage of 2,061.0×. The average contig length was 25,478 bp, and the largest contig was 418,722 bp. The genome of Bif4 was 100% complete and contained 0.45% sequence contamination as determined using CheckM v1.0.18 (2). Genome annotations were assessed with Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology (RAST) and the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP). PGAP annotation identified 1,841 total genes, 1,781 total coding DNA sequences, 60 RNA genes, and 52 tRNAs. Genome assembly and its PGAP annotation are publicly available. RAST annotated the genome into 265 subsystems containing a total of 996 proteins (3). CRISPRCasFinder identified a total of nine CRISPR sequences in various contigs of the genome (4). EzBioCloud revealed that the 16S rRNA gene sequence of Bif4 had the highest identity (99.09%) with Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum DSM 20438T and 98.39% identity with Bifidobacterium catenulatum subsp. catenulatum DSM 16992T (5). The average nucleotide identity (ANI) value of Bif4 was calculated using the ANI calculator with closely related genomes (6). Results suggested that Bif4 shared ANI values of 97.43% and 82.41% with Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum DSM 20438T and Bifidobacterium adolescentis ATCC 15703T, respectively. This further indicated its species assignment to Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum with a ≥95% cutoff value for species delineation (5). Bif4 harbors 41 genes responsible for central carbohydrate metabolism, including 8 genes coding for fructooligosaccharide and raffinose utilization, 9 genes for lactose and galactose uptake and utilization, and 15 genes for maltose and maltodextrin utilization. Importantly, the strain also contains genes required for sucrose utilization, trehalose uptake and utilization, d-ribose utilization, l-arabinose utilization, xylose utilization, glycogen metabolism, and sialic acid metabolism. The Resistance Gene Identifier tool has validated that the rifamycin-resistant beta-subunit of RNA polymerase (rpoB) (98.4% identity) and elfamycin-resistant EF-Tu (71.32% identity) were reported in the draft genome of Bif4, whereas the identity score was less than 60% for the other genes contributing to drug resistance (7). Functional comparison in RAST annotation revealed that Bif4 was closely related to Bifidobacterium adolescentis ATCC 15703, Bifidobacterium dentium Bd1, Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum DSM 20438, and Bifidobacterium catenulatum DSM 16992.

Data availability.

The assembly (accession no. GCA_011008535.1) and draft genome sequence of B. pseudocatenulatum Bif4 are available as a whole-genome shotgun (WGS) project in GenBank under accession no. QCZO00000000. This is the first version of the project, QCZO01000000, and consists of sequences QCZO01000001 to QCZO01000058. The raw sequencing reads have been deposited under SRA accession no. SRP252338.
  7 in total

1.  The evaluation of a mupirocin-based selective medium for the enumeration of bifidobacteria from probiotic animal feed.

Authors:  P J Simpson; G F Fitzgerald; C Stanton; R P Ross
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.363

2.  A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity.

Authors:  Seok-Hwan Yoon; Sung-Min Ha; Jeongmin Lim; Soonjae Kwon; Jongsik Chun
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.271

3.  CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes.

Authors:  Donovan H Parks; Michael Imelfort; Connor T Skennerton; Philip Hugenholtz; Gene W Tyson
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies.

Authors:  Seok-Hwan Yoon; Sung-Min Ha; Soonjae Kwon; Jeongmin Lim; Yeseul Kim; Hyungseok Seo; Jongsik Chun
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.747

5.  CRISPRCasFinder, an update of CRISRFinder, includes a portable version, enhanced performance and integrates search for Cas proteins.

Authors:  David Couvin; Aude Bernheim; Claire Toffano-Nioche; Marie Touchon; Juraj Michalik; Bertrand Néron; Eduardo P C Rocha; Gilles Vergnaud; Daniel Gautheret; Christine Pourcel
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology.

Authors:  Ramy K Aziz; Daniela Bartels; Aaron A Best; Matthew DeJongh; Terrence Disz; Robert A Edwards; Kevin Formsma; Svetlana Gerdes; Elizabeth M Glass; Michael Kubal; Folker Meyer; Gary J Olsen; Robert Olson; Andrei L Osterman; Ross A Overbeek; Leslie K McNeil; Daniel Paarmann; Tobias Paczian; Bruce Parrello; Gordon D Pusch; Claudia Reich; Rick Stevens; Olga Vassieva; Veronika Vonstein; Andreas Wilke; Olga Zagnitko
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  CARD 2020: antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database.

Authors:  Brian P Alcock; Amogelang R Raphenya; Tammy T Y Lau; Kara K Tsang; Mégane Bouchard; Arman Edalatmand; William Huynh; Anna-Lisa V Nguyen; Annie A Cheng; Sihan Liu; Sally Y Min; Anatoly Miroshnichenko; Hiu-Ki Tran; Rafik E Werfalli; Jalees A Nasir; Martins Oloni; David J Speicher; Alexandra Florescu; Bhavya Singh; Mateusz Faltyn; Anastasia Hernandez-Koutoucheva; Arjun N Sharma; Emily Bordeleau; Andrew C Pawlowski; Haley L Zubyk; Damion Dooley; Emma Griffiths; Finlay Maguire; Geoff L Winsor; Robert G Beiko; Fiona S L Brinkman; William W L Hsiao; Gary V Domselaar; Andrew G McArthur
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Isomaltooligosaccharides utilization and genomic characterization of human infant anti-inflammatory Bifidobacterium longum and Bifidobacterium breve strains.

Authors:  Shikha Sharma; Shashank Singh; Vasvi Chaudhary; Shrikant Mantri; Atul Chander; Ruchika Maurya; Sivasubhramanian Rajarammohan; Ravindra Pal Singh; Praveen Rishi; Mahendra Bishnoi; Sanjay Kumar Bhadada; Kanthi Kiran Kondepudi
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 2.406

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.