Literature DB >> 32586525

Perineal Groove: An Anorectal Malformation Network, Consortium Study.

Inbal Samuk1, Eva E Amerstorfer2, Maria Fanjul3, Barbara D Iacobelli4, Gabriele Lisi5, Paola Midrio6, Anna Morandi7, Eberhard Schmiedeke8, Pernilla Stenstrom9, Christien Sleeboom10.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the Anorectal Malformation Network experience with perineal groove (PG) focusing on its clinical characteristics and management. STUDY
DESIGN: Data on patients with PG managed at 10 participating Anorectal Malformation Network centers in 1999-2019 were collected retrospectively by questionnaire.
RESULTS: The cohort included 66 patients (65 females) of median age 1.4 months at diagnosis. The leading referral diagnosis was anal fissure (n = 20 [30.3%]): 23 patients (34.8%) had anorectal malformations. Expectant management was practiced in 47 patients (71.2%). Eight (17%) were eventually operated for local complications. The median time to surgery was 14 months (range, 3.0-48.6 months), and the median age at surgery was 18.3 months (range, 4.8-58.0 months). In the 35 patients available for follow-up of the remaining 39 managed expectantly, 23 (65.7%) showed complete or near-complete self-epithelization by a mean age 15.3 months (range, 1-72 months) and 4 (11.4%) showed partial self-epithelization by a mean age 21 months (range, 3-48 months). Eight patients showed no resolution (5 were followed for ≤3 months). Nineteen patients (28.7%) were primarily treated with surgery. In total, 27 patients were operated. Dehiscence occurred in 3 of 27 operated patients (11.1%).
CONCLUSIONS: PG seems to be an underestimated anomaly, frequently associated with anorectal malformations. Most cases heal spontaneously; therefore, expectant management is recommended. When associated with anorectal malformations requiring reconstruction, PG should be excised in conjunction with the anorectoplasty.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anorectal malformations; congenital anomaly; groove; neonatal; perineal sulcus; perineum

Year:  2020        PMID: 32586525     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.03.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  2 in total

1.  Newborn twins with perineal grooves.

Authors:  Hannah M Rabinovich; Kimberly G Montez
Journal:  SAGE Open Med Case Rep       Date:  2021-05-30

2.  Congenital Perineal Groove Defect in Monozygotic Twin Infants: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Mimily Harsono; David Yanishevski; Massroor Pourcyrous
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2021-03-31
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.