Literature DB >> 32585565

Epidemiology and outcomes of residual neuromuscular blockade: A systematic review of observational studies.

Amit D Raval1, Vamshi Ruthwik Anupindi2, Cheryl P Ferrufino2, Diana L Arper2, Lori D Bash1, Sorin J Brull3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Complete reversal of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) is important for patient safety and prognosis following surgical procedures involving NMB agents (NMBAs). Published evidence on the epidemiology and consequences of residual neuromuscular blockade (rNMB; incomplete neuromuscular recovery) in real-world clinical settings is lacking with advances in NMB management. Therefore, we aimed to examine the burden of rNMB and its associated clinical, economic and humanistic outcomes using a systematic review framework. REVIEW
METHODS: Electronic and conference database searches were performed to include observational studies examining rNMB or related outcomes in adults undergoing surgery and receiving NMBAs with or without NMBA antagonists.
RESULTS: Of 1438 screened abstracts, 58 studies with 25,277 total patients were included. Inconsistent definitions of rNMB were reported across studies with 44 (76%) and 29 (50%) studies utilizing quantitative and qualitative measures to detect rNMB, respectively. The most common definition of rNMB was train-of-four ratio (TOFR) <0.9 (29 studies) and TOFR <0.7 (16 studies) measured at post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) entry. For TOFR <0.9 at PACU entry, rNMB incidence ranged from 0% to 90.5% (median 30%) overall; 0% to 16.0% in the sugammadex (SUG) group; 3.5% to 90.5% in the neostigmine (NEO) group; and 15% to 89% in the spontaneous recovery (SR) group. Twenty-one studies reported clinical outcomes (reintubation, mild hypoxemia, or a respiratory event) or resource utilization outcomes (hospital/PACU length of stay [LOS]) by presence/absence of rNMB. Patients with rNMB had higher rates of acute respiratory events compared to those without rNMB.
CONCLUSIONS: Real-world observational studies show a significant burden of rNMB and associated health sequelae, though rNMB measures were not reported consistently across studies. Appropriate quantitative measurement is needed to accurately identify rNMB, and interventions are needed to reduce its burden and associated adverse outcomes.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neuromuscular blockade; Real-world evidence; Residual neuromuscular block; Sugammadex; Systematic literature review

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32585565     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  2 in total

1.  A Clinical and Budgetary Impact Analysis of Introducing Sugammadex for Routine Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade in a Hypothetical Cohort in the US.

Authors:  Yiling Jiang; Lori D Bash; Leif Saager
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  Required dose of sugammadex or neostigmine for reversal of vecuronium-induced shallow residual neuromuscular block at a train-of-four ratio of 0.3.

Authors:  Jing He; Huan He; Xing Li; Mei Sun; Zhihao Lai; Bo Xu
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 4.689

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.