Literature DB >> 32585363

Inter-Individual Differences in the Responses to Pain Neuroscience Education in Adults With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

James A Watson1, Cormac G Ryan2, Greg Atkinson2, Philip Williamson3, Dominic Ellington4, Robbie Whittle4, John Dixon2, Denis J Martin2.   

Abstract

Pain neuroscience education (PNE) is an approach used in the management of chronic musculoskeletal pain. Previous reviews on PNE and other pain interventions, have focused on mean treatment effects, but in the context of "precision medicine," any inter-individual differences in treatment response are also important to quantify. If inter-individual differences are present, and predictors identified, PNE could be tailored to certain people for optimizing effectiveness. Such heterogeneity can be quantified using recently formulated approaches for comparing the response variance between the treatment and control groups. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the extracted standard deviations of baseline-to-follow up change to quantify the inter-individual variation in pain, disability and psychosocial outcomes in response to PNE. Electronic databases were searched between January 1, 2002 and June 14, 2018. The review included 5 randomized controlled trials (n = 428) in which disability outcomes were reported. Using a random effects meta-analysis, the pooled SD (95% confidence interval) for control group-adjusted response heterogeneity to PNE was 7.36 units /100 (95% confidence interval = -3.93 to 11.12). The 95% prediction interval for this response heterogeneity SD was wide (-10.20 to 14.57 units /100). The control group-adjusted proportion of "responders" in the population who would be estimated to exceed a clinically important change of 10/100 ranged from 18 to 45%. Therefore, when baseline-to-follow up random variability in disability is taken into account (informed by the control arm), there is currently insufficient evidence for the notion of clinically important inter-individual differences in disability responses to PNE in people with chronic musculoskeletal pain. The protocol was published on PROSPERO (CRD42017068436). PERSPECTIVE: We bring a novel method to pain science for calculating inter-individual differences in response to a treatment. This is conductedwithin the context of a systematic review and meta-analysis on PNE. We highlight how using erroneous methods for calculating inter-individual differences can drastically change conclusions when compared to appropriate methods. Crown
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Individual response variance; Pain; education; neuroscience

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32585363     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2020.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  3 in total

1.  Can we just talk our patients out of pain? Should pain neuroscience education be our only tool?

Authors:  Rilind Shala; Nathalie Roussel; G Lorimer Moseley; Thomas Osinski; Emilio J Puentedura
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2021-01-11

2.  Effectiveness of multimodal circuit exercises for chronic musculoskeletal pain in older adults: A randomized controlled trial protocol.

Authors:  Daniele B G Ribeiro; Paulo R V Gentil; Renan A Resende; Rodrigo L Carregaro; Sérgio T D Fonseca; Wagner R Martins
Journal:  J Frailty Sarcopenia Falls       Date:  2022-09-01

Review 3.  Effectiveness of Interventions Based on Pain Neuroscience Education on Pain and Psychosocial Variables for Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Leidy Tatiana Ordoñez-Mora; Marco Antonio Morales-Osorio; Ilem D Rosero
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.