Literature DB >> 32585331

Arsenic in US correctional facility drinking water, 2006-2011.

Anne E Nigra1, Ana Navas-Acien2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the quality of drinking water in US correctional facilities (e.g. detention centers, prisons, jails, etc.). Our objective was to determine if incarcerated persons are at risk for chronic, elevated arsenic exposure relative to the non-incarcerated US population, particularly in the Southwestern US where public water and groundwater arsenic concentrations are high compared to the rest of the US.
METHODS: We analyzed 230,158 arsenic monitoring records from 37,086 community water systems (CWSs) from the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Third Six Year Review of Contaminant Occurrence dataset (covering 2006-2011). We compared six-year average arsenic concentrations and the odds of exceeding the EPA's 10 μg/L maximum contaminant level (MCL) for CWSs exclusively serving correctional facilities versus all other CWSs in the Southwestern US, where groundwater arsenic concentrations are high.
RESULTS: Average six-year water arsenic concentrations were higher for Southwestern correctional facility CWSs (6.41 μg/L, 95% CI 3.48, 9.34) compared to all other Southwestern CWSs (3.11 μg/L, 95% CI 2.97, 3.24) and to other CWSs across the rest of the US (1.39 μg/L, 95% CI 1.35, 1.42). In the Southwest, 26.1% (N = 6) of correctional facility CWSs versus 5.8% (509) of other CWSs reported six-year arsenic averages exceeding 10 μg/L, corresponding to an odds ratio of 5.70 (95% confidence interval 2.24, 14.52). Correctional facility CWSs in the Southwest were also more likely to report six-year averages exceeding 5 μg/L (the MCL for New Jersey and New Hampshire, N = 8, odds ratio 2.77, 95% CI 1.17, 6.54). DISCUSSION: Persons incarcerated in the Southwestern US were at disproportionate risk of elevated drinking water arsenic exposure and related disease from 2006 to 2011. Strict enforcement of EPA regulations and additional technical and financial support for CWSs serving correctional facilities in the Southwest is necessary to protect the health and human rights of incarcerated persons.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arsenic; Drinking water; Environmental justice; Incarceration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32585331      PMCID: PMC7483613          DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109768

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  4 in total

1.  Inequalities in Public Water Arsenic Concentrations in Counties and Community Water Systems across the United States, 2006-2011.

Authors:  Anne E Nigra; Qixuan Chen; Steven N Chillrud; Lili Wang; David Harvey; Brian Mailloux; Pam Factor-Litvak; Ana Navas-Acien
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 9.031

2.  Sociodemographic inequalities in uranium and other metals in community water systems across the USA, 2006-11: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Filippo Ravalli; Yuanzhi Yu; Benjamin C Bostick; Steven N Chillrud; Kathrin Schilling; Anirban Basu; Ana Navas-Acien; Anne E Nigra
Journal:  Lancet Planet Health       Date:  2022-04

3.  The Human Right to Water: A 20-Year Comparative Analysis of Arsenic in Rural and Carceral Drinking Water Systems in California.

Authors:  Jenny Rempel; Isha Ray; Ethan Hessl; Jasmine Vazin; Zehui Zhou; Shin Kim; Xuan Zhang; Chiyu Ding; Ziyi He; David Pellow; Alasdair Cohen
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 11.035

4.  Urinary arsenic and heart disease mortality in NHANES 2003-2014.

Authors:  Anne E Nigra; Katherine A Moon; Miranda R Jones; Tiffany R Sanchez; Ana Navas-Acien
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 8.431

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.