Literature DB >> 32585225

Has a critical mass of women resulted in gender equity in gynecologic surgery?

Christine A Heisler1, Katrina Mark2, Jessica Ton3, Pringl Miller4, Sarah M Temkin3.   

Abstract

Gender equity in medicine and surgery has recently received widespread attention. Unlike surgical specialties that remain predominantly male, the majority of obstetrician-gynecologists have been women for nearly a decade, and women have composed the majority of trainees since the 1990s. Despite a critical mass of women, biases related to gender persist in the field. Professional and behavioral expectations of men and women gynecologists remain different for patients and workplace colleagues. Gender discrimination and sexual harassment are still experienced at high rates by both trainees and obstetrician-gynecologists in practice. In addition, in other surgical fields, women gynecologic surgeons face a gender wage gap that is unexplained by differences in experience, hours worked, or subspecialty training. Academic advancement and the attainment of leadership positions remain a challenge for many women. Policies related to pregnancy and parenting may disproportionately affect the careers of women gynecologists. This article presents peer-reviewed evidence relevant to gender equity in the workplace and suggests proactive interventions to ensure diversity and inclusion for gynecologic surgeons.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gender disparities; gender disparities in leadership; gender harassment; gender wage gap; gynecologic surgery; professionalism

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32585225     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.06.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  5 in total

1.  Women are underrepresented in major US sleep societies recognition awards.

Authors:  Samira Naime; Elias G Karroum
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 4.324

Review 2.  Creating work environments where people of all genders in gynecologic oncology can thrive: An SGO evidence-based review.

Authors:  S M Temkin; E Chapman-Davis; N Nair; D E Cohn; J F Hines; E C Kohn; S V Blank
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 5.304

3.  Predoctoral MD-PhD grants as indicators of future NIH funding success.

Authors:  Shohini Ghosh-Choudhary; Neil Carleton; S Mehdi Nouraie; Corrine R Kliment; Richard A Steinman
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2022-03-22

4.  Gynecologic Oncology and Inclusion of Women Into the Surgical Workforce: The Canary in This Coal Mine.

Authors:  Linda J Hong; Lisa Rubinsak; Michelle F Benoit; Deanna Teoh; Uma Chandavarkar; Amy Brockmeyer; Erin Stevens; Yevgeniya Ioffe; Sarah M Temkin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  Money Matters: Anticipated Expense of In-Person Obstetrics and Gynecology Fellowship Interviews Has Greater Impact for Underrepresented in Medicine and Women Applicants.

Authors:  Christine A Heisler; Sylvia Botros-Brey; Hanzhang Wang; Ann Tran; Bertille Gaigbe-Togbe; Ava Leegant; Anne Hardart
Journal:  Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle)       Date:  2022-08-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.