Literature DB >> 32585072

Cortical and medullary morphology of the tibia.

Carolyn E Taylor1,2, Heath B Henninger1,2, Kent N Bachus1,2,3.   

Abstract

Bone resorption caused by stress shielding and insufficient bone-implant contact continues to be problematic for orthopedic endoprostheses that utilize osseointegration (OI) for skeletal fixation. Morphologic analyses have helped combat this issue by defining anatomic parameters to optimize endoprosthesis loading by maximizing bone-implant contact. These studies have not typically included diaphyseal medullary morphology, as this region is not pertinent to total joint replacement. To the contrary, percutaneous OI endoprostheses for prosthetic limb attachment are placed in the diaphysis of the long bone. This study examined the cortical and medullary morphology of 116 fresh-frozen human cadaveric tibia using computed tomography. Anatomic landmarks were selected and custom MATLAB scripts were used to analyze the cross-sectional cortical and medullary morphology normalized to biomechanical length (BML). BML measured the distance between the tibial plateau and the tibial plafond. Properties such as cortical thickness, medullary diameter, and circularity of the medullary canal were quantified. We tested the influence of sex and laterality on morphology, and examined variations along the length of the bone. Results showed that while both sex and laterality impacted the location of anatomic landmarks, only sex influenced cross-sectional morphology. Overall, morphology significantly affected shape along the length of the bone for all examined properties except medullary circularity. This analysis found that distal to 35% BML, the canal is conducive to a circular implant, with medullary diameter ranging from 13 to 32 mm between 20 and 80% BML. A large size range is necessary for sufficient implant contact in order to accommodate residual limb length after amputation.
© 2020 American Association for Anatomy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anatomic landmarks; cortical; medullary; osseointegration; tibia morphology

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32585072     DOI: 10.1002/ar.24479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)        ISSN: 1932-8486            Impact factor:   2.064


  2 in total

1.  Finite Element Analysis of Transhumeral and Transtibial Percutaneous Osseointegrated Endoprosthesis Implantation.

Authors:  Carolyn E Taylor; Heath B Henninger; Kent N Bachus
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2021-11-23

2.  Clinical Basis for Creating an Osseointegrated Neural Interface.

Authors:  Alison M Karczewski; Weifeng Zeng; Lindsay M Stratchko; Kent N Bachus; Samuel O Poore; Aaron M Dingle
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 5.152

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.