Anita Ho1,2,3, Soodabeh Joolaee3,4,5, Kim Jameson1,6, Christopher Ng7. 1. Centre for Applied Ethics, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 2. Bioethics Program, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA. 3. Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences (CHÉOS), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 4. Department of Indigenous Health, BC Women's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 5. Nursing Care Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 6. Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 7. Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Abstract
Background: Concerns regarding personal, professional, administrative, and institutional implications of medical assistance in dying (MAiD) are of particular interest to palliative and hospice care providers (PHCPs), who may encounter additional moral distress and professional challenges in providing end-of-life (EOL) care in the new legislative and cultural era. Objective: To explore PHCPs' encountered challenges and resource recommendations for caring for patients considering MAiD. Design: Qualitative thematic analysis of audio-recorded semistructured interviews with PHCPs. Setting/Subjects: Multidisciplinary PHCPs in acute, community, residential, and hospice care in Vancouver, Canada, with experience supporting patients who have made MAiD inquiries or requests. Measurements: Interviews were deidentified, transcribed verbatim, and coded by four researchers using a common coding scheme. Key themes were analyzed. Results: Twenty-six PHCP participants included physicians (n = 7), nurses (n = 12), social workers (n = 5), and spiritual health practitioners (n = 2). Average interview length was 52 minutes (range 35-90). Analysis revealed four broad challenges associated with providing EOL care after MAiD legalization: (1) moral ambiguity and provider distress, (2) family distress, (3) interprofessional team conflict, and (4) impact on palliative care. Participants also recommended three types of resources to support clinicians in delivering quality EOL care to patients contemplating MAiD: (1) education and training, (2) pre- and debriefing for team members, and (3) tailored bereavement support. Conclusions: PHCPs encountered multilevel MAiD-related challenges, but noted improvement in organizational policies and coordination. Resources to enhance training, pre- and debriefing, and tailored bereavement may further support PHCPs in providing high-quality EOL care as they navigate the legislative and cultural shifts.
Background: Concerns regarding personal, professional, administrative, and institutional implications of medical assistance in dying (MAiD) are of particular interest to palliative and hospice care providers (PHCPs), who may encounter additional moral distress and professional challenges in providing end-of-life (EOL) care in the new legislative and cultural era. Objective: To explore PHCPs' encountered challenges and resource recommendations for caring for patients considering MAiD. Design: Qualitative thematic analysis of audio-recorded semistructured interviews with PHCPs. Setting/Subjects: Multidisciplinary PHCPs in acute, community, residential, and hospice care in Vancouver, Canada, with experience supporting patients who have made MAiD inquiries or requests. Measurements: Interviews were deidentified, transcribed verbatim, and coded by four researchers using a common coding scheme. Key themes were analyzed. Results: Twenty-six PHCP participants included physicians (n = 7), nurses (n = 12), social workers (n = 5), and spiritual health practitioners (n = 2). Average interview length was 52 minutes (range 35-90). Analysis revealed four broad challenges associated with providing EOL care after MAiD legalization: (1) moral ambiguity and provider distress, (2) family distress, (3) interprofessional team conflict, and (4) impact on palliative care. Participants also recommended three types of resources to support clinicians in delivering quality EOL care to patients contemplating MAiD: (1) education and training, (2) pre- and debriefing for team members, and (3) tailored bereavement support. Conclusions: PHCPs encountered multilevel MAiD-related challenges, but noted improvement in organizational policies and coordination. Resources to enhance training, pre- and debriefing, and tailored bereavement may further support PHCPs in providing high-quality EOL care as they navigate the legislative and cultural shifts.
Entities:
Keywords:
Canada; bioethics; hospice care; medical assistance in dying; palliative care; qualitative research