Literature DB >> 32584067

Alterations in facial expressions of emotion: Determining the promise of ultrathin slicing approaches and comparing human and automated coding methods in psychosis risk.

Tina Gupta1, Claudia M Haase2, Gregory P Strauss1, Alex S Cohen1, Jordyn R Ricard2, Vijay A Mittal1.   

Abstract

Alterations in facial expressions of emotion are a hallmark of psychopathology and may be present before the onset of mental illness. Technological advances have spurred interest in examining alterations based on "thin slices" of behavior using automated approaches. However, questions remain. First, can alterations be detected in ultrathin slices of behavior? Second, how do automated approaches converge with human coding techniques? The present study examined ultrathin (i.e., 1-min) slices of video-recorded clinical interviews of 42 individuals at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis and 42 matched controls. Facial expressions of emotion (e.g., joy, anger) were examined using two automated facial analysis programs and coded by trained human raters (using the Expressive Emotional Behavior Coding System). Results showed that ultrathin (i.e., 1-min) slices of behavior were sufficient to reveal alterations in facial expressions of emotion, specifically blunted joy expressions in individuals at CHR (with supplementary analyses probing links with attenuated positive symptoms and functioning). Furthermore, both automated analysis programs converged in the ability to detect blunted joy expressions and were consistent with human coding at the level of both second-by-second and aggregate data. Finally, there were areas of divergence across approaches for other emotional expressions beyond joy. These data suggest that ultrathin slices of behavior can yield clues about emotional dysfunction. Further, automated approaches (which do not require lengthy training and coder time but do lend well to mobile assessment and computational modeling) show promise, but careful evaluation of convergence with human coding is needed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32584067      PMCID: PMC7759595          DOI: 10.1037/emo0000819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  37 in total

1.  Prodromal assessment with the structured interview for prodromal syndromes and the scale of prodromal symptoms: predictive validity, interrater reliability, and training to reliability.

Authors:  Tandy J Miller; Thomas H McGlashan; Joanna L Rosen; Kristen Cadenhead; Tyrone Cannon; Joseph Ventura; William McFarlane; Diana O Perkins; Godfrey D Pearlson; Scott W Woods
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.306

2.  The NIMH-MATRICS consensus statement on negative symptoms.

Authors:  Brian Kirkpatrick; Wayne S Fenton; William T Carpenter; Stephen R Marder
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  Reliability and validity of nonverbal thin slices in social interactions.

Authors:  Nora A Murphy; Judith A Hall; Marianne Schmid Mast; Mollie A Ruben; Denise Frauendorfer; Danielle Blanch-Hartigan; Debra L Roter; Laurent Nguyen
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-12-08

4.  Digital Phenotyping: Technology for a New Science of Behavior.

Authors:  Thomas R Insel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Definition and reliability.

Authors:  N C Andreasen
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1982-07

6.  Thin slice ratings of client characteristics in intake assessments: predicting symptom change and dropout in cognitive therapy for depression.

Authors:  Katherine E Sasso; Daniel R Strunk
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2013-05-07

7.  Emotional suppression: physiology, self-report, and expressive behavior.

Authors:  J J Gross; R W Levenson
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1993-06

8.  Computerized facial analysis for understanding constricted/blunted affect: initial feasibility, reliability, and validity data.

Authors:  Alex S Cohen; Sean C Morrison; Dallas A Callaway
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Risk factors for psychosis in an ultra high-risk group: psychopathology and clinical features.

Authors:  Alison R Yung; Lisa J Phillips; Hok Pan Yuen; Patrick D McGorry
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Alterations in facial expressivity in youth at clinical high-risk for psychosis.

Authors:  Tina Gupta; Claudia M Haase; Gregory P Strauss; Alex S Cohen; Vijay A Mittal
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2019-03-14
View more
  3 in total

1.  Computerized analysis of facial expressions in serious mental illness.

Authors:  Tovah Cowan; Michael D Masucci; Tina Gupta; Claudia M Haase; Gregory P Strauss; Alex S Cohen
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Genuine and non-genuine smiles in individuals meeting criteria for a clinical high-risk syndrome.

Authors:  Jordyn R Ricard; Tina Gupta; Teresa Vargas; Claudia M Haase; Vijay A Mittal
Journal:  Early Interv Psychiatry       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.721

3.  Clues from caregiver emotional language usage highlight the link between putative social environment and the psychosis-risk syndrome.

Authors:  Tina Gupta; William S Horton; Claudia M Haase; Emily E Carol; Vijay A Mittal
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 4.662

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.