Literature DB >> 32583348

Risk for Severe COVID-19 Illness Among Health Care Workers Who Work Directly with Patients.

Diane M Gibson1, Jessica Greene2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32583348      PMCID: PMC7314425          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-05992-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


× No keyword cloud information.

INTRODUCTION

A recent study from the Centers for Disease Control found that health care workers in the USA accounted for 19% of confirmed COVID-19 cases with information on occupation.[1] At the same time, evidence is mounting that pre-existing conditions such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, hypertension, and obesity, as well as older age, are associated with a higher risk of hospitalization, admission to an intensive care unit, and death among those with COVID-19.[2] Health care workers who have direct contact with patients not only have an increased likelihood of being exposed to COVID-19, but those who are older or who have high-risk comorbidities are at particular risk of adverse COVID-19 outcomes. In the USA, 8.8% of physicians and 3.8% of registered nurses are aged ≥ 65 years.[3] The objective of this study is to estimate the prevalence of high-risk comorbidities and older age for five types of health care workers, focusing on those who have direct contact with patients. The study also examines the sociodemographic characteristics of health care workers who are at higher risk for adverse COVID-19 outcomes.

METHODS

This study used pooled data on adults aged ≥ 18 years from the 2017 and 2018 National Health Interview Surveys (NHIS) (n = 52,159). The NHIS are nationally representative of the non-institutionalized civilian population. A subsample was created of individuals who reported physical or hands-on contact with patients as part of their routine work and whose occupation was health care practitioner or technician (Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) code 29) or health care support (SOC code 31) (n = 1814).[4] Practitioner and technician occupation categories were further defined by the entry level education required for the occupation (see Tables 1 and 2).[5]
Table 1

Prevalence of High-Risk Characteristics for Adverse COVID-19 Outcomes Among Health Care Workers Who Work Directly with Patients, by Occupation Category (n = 1814)

Doctors and other clinicians (n = 252)PA/NP, therapists, and others with Master’s degree (n = 151)Nurses, nutritionists, and others with Bachelor’s degree (n = 433)LPNs, EMTs, and others with less than a Bachelor’s degree (n = 462)Home health aides, medical assistants, and other support roles (n = 516)
Weighted % (95% CI)Weighted % (95% CI)Weighted % (95% CI)Weighted % (95% CI)Weighted % (95% CI)p value
1 or more high-risk comorbidity29.6 (23.5–36.4)25.4 (18.5–33.8)32.1 (26.9–37.7)45.5 (39.7–51.5)41.2 (36.2–46.4)< .000
Age ≥ 65 years old9.2 (6.3–13.3)1.5 (0.7–3.5)4.3 (2.7–6.8)3.0 (1.8–4.9)3.2 (2.0–5.1)< .000
1 or more high-risk comorbidity or age ≥ 6532.4 (26.1–39.4)26.6 (19.6–35.0)33.8 (28.7–39.4)46.8 (40.9–52.7)42.6 (37.5–47.8)< .000

PA physician assistant, NP nurse practitioner, LPN licensed practical nurse, EMT emergency medical technician. Of individuals in the health care sector who worked directly with patients, 14.8% were doctors or other clinicians; 8.4% were physician assistants, nurse practitioners, therapists, or others with Master’s degrees; 24.4% were nurses, nutritionists, or others with Bachelor’s degrees; 24.6% were licensed practical nurses, EMTs, or others with less than a Bachelor’s degree; and 27.9% were home health aides or medical assistants. Analyses were weighted and accounted for the NHIS complex sampling design

Table 2

Work Setting, Demographic, and Socioeconomic Characteristics of Health Care Workers Who Work Directly with Patients and Are at Higher Risk of Adverse COVID-19 Outcomes, by Occupation Category (n = 745)

Doctors and other clinicians (n = 86)PA/NP, therapists, and others with Master’s degree (n = 50)Nurses, nutritionists, and others with Bachelor’s degree (n = 149)LPNs, EMTs, and others with less than a Bachelor’s degree (n = 227)Home health aides, medical assistants, and other support roles (n = 233)
Weighted % (95% CI)Weighted % (95% CI)Weighted % (95% CI)Weighted % (95% CI)Weighted % (95% CI)p value
Work setting
Hospital24.7 (15.1–37.8)64.1 (46.9–78.4)65.3 (55.4–74.0)44.9 (36.8–53.3)13.4 (9.2–19.2)< .000
Nursing home1.9 (0.5–7.4)1.4 (0.2–9.5)2.6 (1.0–6.8)14.5 (9.7–21.1)34.5 (27.7–42.1)< .000
Female28.1 (17.8–41.4)79.0 (63.5–89.0)83.7 (74.5–90.2)77.8 (69.6–84.4)87.6 (81.2–92.0)< .000
Race/ethnicity
White (non-Latino)73.3 (59.6–83.5)73.5 (54.6–86.5)56.2 (45.1–66.7)73.7 (65.7–80.4)55.8 (47.6–63.7)< .000
African American (non-Latino)7.2 (2.5–19.2)2.7 (0.4–16.8)20.0 (12.7–32.7)14.5 (9.7–21.3)25.8 (19.4–33.5)
Latino1.7 (0.4–7.0)6.3 (1.6–21.9)6.8 (2.4–17.9)10.5 (6.2–17.0)15.6 (10.2–23.1)
Other17.8 (9.4–31.4)17.5 (7.0–37.5)16.0 (9.3–26.2)1.3 (0.3–4.9)2.8 (1.1–7.3)
Has health insurance98.4 (92.9–99.7)10098.7 (95.4–99.6)93.5 (87.7–96.6)85.8 (79.8–90.2)< .000
Family financial resources
Income < 200% of federal poverty line0.4 (0.1–2.9)1.0 (0.1–6.8)4.5 (2.0–9.7)12.2 (8.2–18.0)36.9 (29.4–45.1)< .000
Could not afford prescription medication, past 12 months0.7 (0.1–4.6)1.0 (0.1–6.8)5.6 (2.9–10.6)7.3 (4.3–12.0)17.5 (12.0–24.7)< .000
Worried food would run out, past 30 days002.0 (0.1–6.9)12.2 (8.1–18.0)26.6 (20.3–34.1)< .000

PA physician assistant, NP nurse practitioner, LPN licensed practical nurse, EMT emergency medical technician. Of individuals in the health care sector who worked directly with patients and were at higher risk of adverse COVID-19 outcomes, 12.4% were doctors or other clinicians; 5.8% were physician assistants, nurse practitioners, therapists, or others with Master’s degrees; 21.3% were nurses, nutritionists, or others with Bachelor’s degrees; 29.8% were licensed practical nurses, EMTs, or others with less than a Bachelor’s degree; and 30.7% were home health aides or medical assistants. Analyses were weighted and accounted for the NHIS complex sampling design

Prevalence of High-Risk Characteristics for Adverse COVID-19 Outcomes Among Health Care Workers Who Work Directly with Patients, by Occupation Category (n = 1814) PA physician assistant, NP nurse practitioner, LPN licensed practical nurse, EMT emergency medical technician. Of individuals in the health care sector who worked directly with patients, 14.8% were doctors or other clinicians; 8.4% were physician assistants, nurse practitioners, therapists, or others with Master’s degrees; 24.4% were nurses, nutritionists, or others with Bachelor’s degrees; 24.6% were licensed practical nurses, EMTs, or others with less than a Bachelor’s degree; and 27.9% were home health aides or medical assistants. Analyses were weighted and accounted for the NHIS complex sampling design Work Setting, Demographic, and Socioeconomic Characteristics of Health Care Workers Who Work Directly with Patients and Are at Higher Risk of Adverse COVID-19 Outcomes, by Occupation Category (n = 745) PA physician assistant, NP nurse practitioner, LPN licensed practical nurse, EMT emergency medical technician. Of individuals in the health care sector who worked directly with patients and were at higher risk of adverse COVID-19 outcomes, 12.4% were doctors or other clinicians; 5.8% were physician assistants, nurse practitioners, therapists, or others with Master’s degrees; 21.3% were nurses, nutritionists, or others with Bachelor’s degrees; 29.8% were licensed practical nurses, EMTs, or others with less than a Bachelor’s degree; and 30.7% were home health aides or medical assistants. Analyses were weighted and accounted for the NHIS complex sampling design COVID-19 high-risk comorbidity variables available from the NHIS were BMI ≥ 40, cancer in the past 3 years, cardiovascular disease, chronic lung disease or an asthma attack in the past year, current smoker, diabetes, kidney disease, and liver disease.[2] Direct patient care health care workers were categorized as being at higher risk of adverse COVID-19 outcomes (“higher-risk health care workers”) if they had ≥ 1 high-risk comorbidity or if they were aged ≥ 65 years (n = 745). Descriptive statistics were calculated and Pearson design–based F-tests were used to determine whether percentages differed significantly across occupation categories. All estimates were weighted and accounted for the NHIS complex sampling design.

RESULTS

Of the 3.8% of US adults who worked directly with patients as health care workers, 38.6% were higher risk. Among direct patient care health care workers, the prevalence of high-risk comorbidities, older age, and higher-risk status differed significantly across occupation categories (Table 1). Among the subsample of higher-risk health care workers, 67.5% had 1 high-risk comorbidity, 28.3% had ≥ 2 high-risk comorbidities, and 10.8% were aged ≥ 65 years. Of this subsample, 52.5% worked in support roles, 54.0% worked in hospitals or nursing homes, 74.9% were women, 64.4% were white, 17.8% were African American, and 9.9% were Latino. Among higher-risk health care workers, there were significant differences across occupation categories in work setting, gender, race/ethnicity, health insurance status, and financial resources (Table 2).

DISCUSSION

The findings of this study suggest that more than a third of individuals in health care occupations who work directly with patients are at an elevated risk of adverse COVID-19 outcomes if they become ill. Additionally, a quarter of higher-risk health care workers have multiple high-risk comorbidities, further increasing the likelihood of adverse COVID-19 outcomes. More than half of higher-risk health care workers work in hospitals or nursing homes, settings with high levels of exposure to COVID-19. These findings highlight the crucial importance of personal protective equipment for those who work directly with patients across health care occupations and locations of care. Furthermore, health care practitioners and technicians with lower education and those in health care support occupations are more likely to have high-risk comorbidities as well as strained financial resources. Assuming that the estimates from the pooled 2017 and 2018 NHIS data offer reasonable estimates for 2020, the findings highlight the precarious position of health care workers who hold these jobs and the difficult trade-off they may face in deciding whether to risk their health or to risk losing their livelihood.
  3 in total

1.  Older Clinicians and the Surge in Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Authors:  Peter I Buerhaus; David I Auerbach; Douglas O Staiger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Preliminary Estimates of the Prevalence of Selected Underlying Health Conditions Among Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 - United States, February 12-March 28, 2020.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 17.586

3.  Characteristics of Health Care Personnel with COVID-19 - United States, February 12-April 9, 2020.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 17.586

  3 in total
  5 in total

1.  Disease Severity and Comorbidities among Healthcare Worker COVID-19 Admissions in South Africa: A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Edith Ratshikhopha; Munyadziwa Muvhali; Nisha Naicker; Nonhlanhla Tlotleng; Waasila Jassat; Tanusha Singh
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices' Ethical Principles for Allocating Initial Supplies of COVID-19 Vaccine - United States, 2020.

Authors:  Nancy McClung; Mary Chamberland; Kathy Kinlaw; Dayna Bowen Matthew; Megan Wallace; Beth P Bell; Grace M Lee; H Keipp Talbot; José R Romero; Sara E Oliver; Kathleen Dooling
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 17.586

3.  Knowledge of and preparedness for COVID-19 among Somali healthcare professionals: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jude Alawa; Lucas Walz; Samir Al-Ali; Nikhil Harle; Eleanor Wiles; Mohamed Abdullahi Awale; Deqo Mohamed; Kaveh Khoshnood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A tranquil virtual reality experience to reduce subjective stress among COVID-19 frontline healthcare workers.

Authors:  Elizabeth Beverly; Laurie Hommema; Kara Coates; Gary Duncan; Brad Gable; Thomas Gutman; Matthew Love; Carrie Love; Michelle Pershing; Nancy Stevens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Professional grief among nurses in Spanish public health centers after caring for COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  María Ángeles Vázquez-Sánchez; Victoria Ayllón-Pérez; Daniel Gutiérrez-Sánchez; Inmaculada Valero-Cantero; Eloisa Fernandez-Ordoñez; Marina García-Gámez; Cristina Casals
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 3.928

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.