Literature DB >> 32583345

Charlson Comorbidity Index Score and Risk of Severe Outcome and Death in Danish COVID-19 Patients.

Daniel Mølager Christensen1, Jarl Emanuel Strange2, Gunnar Gislason3, Christian Torp-Pedersen4, Thomas Gerds5, Emil Fosbøl6, Matthew Phelps3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32583345      PMCID: PMC7314426          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-05991-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


× No keyword cloud information.

INTRODUCTION

Studies assessing the impact of total comorbidity burden on outcomes of COVID-19 in age- and sex-controlled analyses are lacking. Previous studies identified the following single comorbidities as risk factors for poor COVID-19 outcomes: coronary heart disease, congestive heart failure, cardiac arrhythmia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cancer, and diabetes.[1] In this nationwide study of Danish COVID-19 patients, we investigated if Charlson Comorbidity Index Score (CCIS) was associated with the risk of severe outcome and death.

METHODS

In Denmark, all permanent residents are provided a unique personal identification number enabling cross-linkage of complete nationwide healthcare registries. We included all patients diagnosed with COVID-19 until May 3, 2020, using information from the Danish Civil Registration System (holding demographic data) and the Danish National Patient Registry (holding data on all hospital contacts classified according to ICD-10 codes). Data on comorbidities 10 years prior to the date of COVID-19 were identified to calculate the exposure of interest: CCIS of 0, 1–2, 3–4, and > 4.[2] Outcomes of interest were (1) a composite of death, diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome (ICD-10: DB972A), intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and (2) death. Logistic regression models adjusted for sex and age as a continuous variable were employed to associate CCIS 1–2, CCIS 3–4, and CCIS > 4 with odds of outcomes. The models were used to estimate the absolute risk of both outcomes according to CCIS groups across ages 40–85 for both sexes.

RESULTS

A total of 4480 patients were diagnosed with COVID-19, of which 2911 (65.0%), 1112 (24.8%), 288 (6.4%), and 169 (3.8%) had a CCIS of 0, 1–2, 3–4, and > 4, respectively (Table 1). The median age of the total population was 55 years, with the oldest patients in the CCIS 3–4 group (78 years).
Table 1

Baseline Characteristics

CCIS 0 (n = 2911)CCIS 1–2 (n = 1112)CCIS 3–4 (n = 288)CCIS > 4 (n = 169)Total (n = 4480)
Male1326 (45.6)559 (50.3)149 (51.7)110 (65.1)2,144 (47.9)
Age [IQR]47 [35, 58]71 [56, 81]78 [67, 85]77 [69, 83]55 [41, 72]
CCIS [IQR]0 [0, 0]1 [1, 2]3 [3, 4]6 [5, 8]0 [0, 1]
Comorbidities, no. (%)
Myocardial infarction0 (0.0)65 (5.8)40 (13.9)44 (26.0)149 (3.3)
Heart failure0 (0.0)77 (6.9)66 (22.9)55 (32.5)198 (4.4)
Cerebrovascular disease0 (0.0)171 (15.4)85 (29.5)50 (29.6)306 (6.8)
Peripheral vascular disease0 (0.0)63 (5.7)52 (18.1)45 (26.6)160 (3.6)
Diabetes with complications0 (0.0)38 (3.4)60 (20.8)62 (36.7)160 (3.6)
Diabetes0 (0.0)206 (18.5)102 (35.4)88 (52.1)396 (8.8)
Dementia0 (0.0)100 (9.0)36 (12.5)20 (11.8)156 (3.5)
Hemi- or paraplegia0 (0.0)10 (0.9)5 (1.7)6 (3.6)21 (0.5)
Rheumatic disease0 (0.0)71 (6.4)34 (11.8)13 (7.7)118 (2.6)
Peptic ulcer0 (0.0)24 (2.2)19 (6.6)18 (10.7)61 (1.4)
COPD0 (0.0)306 (27.5)93 (32.3)66 (39.1)465 (10.4)
Chronic renal disease0 (0.0)30 (2.7)57 (19.8)67 (39.6)154 (3.4)
Mild liver disease0 (0.0)35 (3.1)11 (3.8)16 (9.5)62 (1.4)
Severe liver disease0 (0.0)0 (0.0)8 (2.8)10 (5.9)18 (0.4)
Cancer0 (0.0)156 (14.0)106 (36.8)86 (50.9)348 (7.8)
Metastatic cancer0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)49 (29.0)49 (1.1)
HIV/AIDS0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)**

CCIS, Charlson comorbidity index score; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; IQR, interquartile range. *Low number of observations, blanked to ensure patient anonymity

Baseline Characteristics CCIS, Charlson comorbidity index score; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; IQR, interquartile range. *Low number of observations, blanked to ensure patient anonymity Overall, 17.8% had severe outcome and 9.3% died. In the CCIS 0 group, 265 (9.1%) had severe outcome and 77 (2.6%) died. In the CCIS 1–2, 3–4, and > 4 groups, 330 (29.7%), 123 (42.7%), and 80 (47.3%) had severe outcome and 197 (17.7%), 85 (29.5%), and 58 (34.3%) died, respectively. The odds of severe COVID-19 were significantly increased in CCIS 1–2 (odds ratio [OR], 1.76 [95% CI, 1.43 to 2.16]), CCIS 3-4 (OR, 2.36 [95% CI, 1.74 to 3.18]) and CCIS > 4 (OR, 2.67 [95% CI, 1.87 to 3.81]) compared with those in CCIS 0. The odds of death were significantly increased for CCIS 1–2 (OR, 2.13 [95% CI, 1.57 to 2.90]), CCIS 3–4 (OR, 3.00 [95% CI, 2.06 to 4.38]), and CCIS > 4 (OR, 3.85 [95% CI, 2.51 to 5.90]) compared with those for CCIS 0. The estimated absolute risks of severe COVID-19 and death were increased for CCIS 1–2, 3–4, and > 4 compared with those for CCIS 0 across ages and sexes (Fig. 1).
Figure 1

Estimated risks of severe outcome and death according to sex, age, and Charlson Comorbidity Index Score (CCIS).

Estimated risks of severe outcome and death according to sex, age, and Charlson Comorbidity Index Score (CCIS).

DISCUSSION

A Charlson Comorbidity Index Score above 0 was associated with an increased risk of severe COVID-19 and death when controlled for age and sex. This expands upon previous findings of individual comorbidities as independent risk factors for poor COVID-19 outcomes.[1] Our findings may inform epidemic modeling, public health, and clinical decisions regarding the management of the COVID-19 pandemic. A limitation of this study was that not all patients had reached a study outcome or recovered by the end of the study period. Additionally, it was not possible to associate the individual comorbidities constituting the CCIS with the outcomes due to lack of power. The Danish healthcare system is free with universal access and its ICU capacity was not exceeded during the study period,[3] which must be considered when interpreting our findings. More studies are needed to assess the impact of comorbidity combinations on COVID-19 outcomes and to determine if other validated comorbidity scores can predict poor outcomes of COVID-19.
  2 in total

1.  Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data.

Authors:  Hude Quan; Vijaya Sundararajan; Patricia Halfon; Andrew Fong; Bernard Burnand; Jean-Christophe Luthi; L Duncan Saunders; Cynthia A Beck; Thomas E Feasby; William A Ghali
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Comorbidity and its impact on 1590 patients with COVID-19 in China: a nationwide analysis.

Authors:  Wei-Jie Guan; Wen-Hua Liang; Yi Zhao; Heng-Rui Liang; Zi-Sheng Chen; Yi-Min Li; Xiao-Qing Liu; Ru-Chong Chen; Chun-Li Tang; Tao Wang; Chun-Quan Ou; Li Li; Ping-Yan Chen; Ling Sang; Wei Wang; Jian-Fu Li; Cai-Chen Li; Li-Min Ou; Bo Cheng; Shan Xiong; Zheng-Yi Ni; Jie Xiang; Yu Hu; Lei Liu; Hong Shan; Chun-Liang Lei; Yi-Xiang Peng; Li Wei; Yong Liu; Ya-Hua Hu; Peng Peng; Jian-Ming Wang; Ji-Yang Liu; Zhong Chen; Gang Li; Zhi-Jian Zheng; Shao-Qin Qiu; Jie Luo; Chang-Jiang Ye; Shao-Yong Zhu; Lin-Ling Cheng; Feng Ye; Shi-Yue Li; Jin-Ping Zheng; Nuo-Fu Zhang; Nan-Shan Zhong; Jian-Xing He
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 16.671

  2 in total
  39 in total

1.  Performance of the APOP-screener for predicting in-hospital mortality in older COVID-19 patients: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Marleen G A M van der Velde; Merel J van der Aa; Merel H C van Daal; Marjolein N T Kremers; Carolina J P W Keijsers; Sander M J van Kuijk; Harm R Haak
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.070

2.  The Impact of Charlson Comorbidity Index on the Functional Capacity of COVID-19 Survivors: A Prospective Cohort Study with One-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Rodrigo Núñez-Cortés; Constanza Malhue-Vidal; Florencia Gath; Gonzalo Valdivia-Lobos; Rodrigo Torres-Castro; Carlos Cruz-Montecinos; Francisco M Martinez-Arnau; Sofía Pérez-Alenda; Rubén López-Bueno; Joaquín Calatayud
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 3.  Low-Dose Radiation Therapy (LDRT) for COVID-19: Benefits or Risks?

Authors:  Pataje G Prasanna; Gayle E Woloschak; Andrea L DiCarlo; Jeffrey C Buchsbaum; Dörthe Schaue; Arnab Chakravarti; Francis A Cucinotta; Silvia C Formenti; Chandan Guha; Dale J Hu; Mohammad K Khan; David G Kirsch; Sunil Krishnan; Wolfgang W Leitner; Brian Marples; William McBride; Minesh P Mehta; Shahin Rafii; Elad Sharon; Julie M Sullivan; Ralph R Weichselbaum; Mansoor M Ahmed; Bhadrasain Vikram; C Norman Coleman; Kathryn D Held
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Admission Rates During a Second COVID-19 Lockdown.

Authors:  Daniel Mølager Christensen; Jawad Haider Butt; Emil Fosbøl; Lars Køber; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Gunnar Gislason; Matthew Phelps
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Sex-Based Differences in COVID-19 Outcomes.

Authors:  Astha Tejpal; Eugenia Gianos; Jane Cerise; Jamie S Hirsch; Stacey Rosen; Nina Kohn; Martin Lesser; Catherine Weinberg; David Majure; Sanjaya K Satapathy; David Bernstein; Matthew A Barish; Alex C Spyropoulos; Rachel-Maria Brown
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  A Simplified Comorbidity Evaluation Predicting Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019.

Authors:  Jessica J Kirby; Sajid Shaikh; David P Bryant; Amy F Ho; James P d'Etienne; Chet D Schrader; Hao Wang
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2021-04-27

7.  Clinical and Laboratory Findings of COVID-19 in High-Altitude Inhabitants of Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Mostafa Abdelsalam; Raad M M Althaqafi; Sara A Assiri; Taghreed M Althagafi; Saleh M Althagafi; Ahmed Y Fouda; Ahmed Ramadan; Mohammed Rabah; Reham M Ahmed; Zein S Ibrahim; Dalal M Nemenqani; Ahmed N Alghamdi; Daifullah Al Aboud; Ahmed S Abdel-Moneim; Adnan A Alsulaimani
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-05-12

8.  Myocardial Injury in COVID-19 Patients: Association with Inflammation, Coagulopathy and In-Hospital Prognosis.

Authors:  Victor Arévalos; Luis Ortega-Paz; Juan José Rodríguez-Arias; Margarita Calvo; Leticia Castrillo; Anthony Salazar; Merce Roque; Ana Paula Dantas; Manel Sabaté; Salvatore Brugaletta
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Age differences in the association of comorbid burden with adverse outcomes in SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  A M O'Hare; K Berry; V S Fan; K Crothers; M C Eastment; J A Dominitz; J A Shah; P Green; E Locke; G N Ioannou
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 4.070

10.  Cardiovascular comorbidities as predictors for severe COVID-19 infection or death.

Authors:  Matthew Phelps; Daniel Mølager Christensen; Thomas Gerds; Emil Fosbøl; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Morten Schou; Lars Køber; Kristian Kragholm; Charlotte Andersson; Tor Biering-Sørensen; Helle Collatz Christensen; Mikkel Porsborg Andersen; Gunnar Gislason
Journal:  Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes       Date:  2021-03-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.