Literature DB >> 32582883

Automated CT and MRI Liver Segmentation and Biometry Using a Generalized Convolutional Neural Network.

Kang Wang1,2, Adrija Mamidipalli2, Tara Retson1,2, Naeim Bahrami1, Kyle Hasenstab2, Kevin Blansit1, Emily Bass2, Timoteo Delgado2, Guilherme Cunha2, Michael S Middleton2, Rohit Loomba3, Brent A Neuschwander-Tetri4, Claude B Sirlin2, Albert Hsiao1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess feasibility of training a convolutional neural network (CNN) to automate liver segmentation across different imaging modalities and techniques used in clinical practice and apply this to enable automation of liver biometry.
METHODS: We trained a 2D U-Net CNN for liver segmentation in two stages using 330 abdominal MRI and CT exams acquired at our institution. First, we trained the neural network with non-contrast multi-echo spoiled-gradient-echo (SGPR)images with 300 MRI exams to provide multiple signal-weightings. Then, we used transfer learning to generalize the CNN with additional images from 30 contrast-enhanced MRI and CT exams.We assessed the performance of the CNN using a distinct multi-institutional data set curated from multiple sources (n = 498 subjects). Segmentation accuracy was evaluated by computing Dice scores. Utilizing these segmentations, we computed liver volume from CT and T1-weighted (T1w) MRI exams, and estimated hepatic proton- density-fat-fraction (PDFF) from multi-echo T2*w MRI exams. We compared quantitative volumetry and PDFF estimates between automated and manual segmentation using Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman statistics.
RESULTS: Dice scores were 0.94 ± 0.06 for CT (n = 230), 0.95 ± 0.03 (n = 100) for T1w MR, and 0.92 ± 0.05 for T2*w MR (n = 169). Liver volume measured by manual and automated segmentation agreed closely for CT (95% limit-of-agreement (LoA) = [-298 mL, 180 mL]) and T1w MR (LoA = [-358 mL, 180 mL]). Hepatic PDFF measured by the two segmentations also agreed closely (LoA = [-0.62%, 0.80%]).
CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing a transfer-learning strategy, we have demonstrated the feasibility of a CNN to be generalized to perform liver segmentations across different imaging techniques and modalities. With further refinement and validation, CNNs may have broad applicability for multimodal liver volumetry and hepatic tissue characterization.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 32582883      PMCID: PMC7314107          DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2019180022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell        ISSN: 2638-6100


  32 in total

1.  Modeling liver motion and deformation during the respiratory cycle using intensity-based nonrigid registration of gated MR images.

Authors:  Torsten Rohlfing; Calvin R Maurer; Walter G O'Dell; Jianhui Zhong
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Liver and spleen volumetry with quantitative MR imaging and dual-space clustering segmentation.

Authors:  Steven W Farraher; Hernan Jara; Kevin J Chang; Andrew Hou; Jorge A Soto
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Fat quantification with IDEAL gradient echo imaging: correction of bias from T(1) and noise.

Authors:  Chia-Ying Liu; Charles A McKenzie; Huanzhou Yu; Jean H Brittain; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 4.  Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging: historical review, current status and future potential.

Authors:  Kunio Doi
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 4.790

Review 5.  Deep learning.

Authors:  Yann LeCun; Yoshua Bengio; Geoffrey Hinton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Quantitative radiology: automated CT liver volumetry compared with interactive volumetry and manual volumetry.

Authors:  Kenji Suzuki; Mark L Epstein; Ryan Kohlbrenner; Shailesh Garg; Masatoshi Hori; Aytekin Oto; Richard L Baron
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  The emerging science of quantitative imaging biomarkers terminology and definitions for scientific studies and regulatory submissions.

Authors:  Larry G Kessler; Huiman X Barnhart; Andrew J Buckler; Kingshuk Roy Choudhury; Marina V Kondratovich; Alicia Toledano; Alexander R Guimaraes; Ross Filice; Zheng Zhang; Daniel C Sullivan
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.021

8.  Feasibility of semiautomated MR volumetry using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI at hepatobiliary phase for living liver donors.

Authors:  Jeongjin Lee; Kyoung Won Kim; So Yeon Kim; Bohyoung Kim; So Jung Lee; Hyoung Jung Kim; Jong Seok Lee; Moon Gyu Lee; Gi-Won Song; Shin Hwang; Sung-Gyu Lee
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Liver Surface Nodularity Score Allows Prediction of Cirrhosis Decompensation and Death.

Authors:  Andrew D Smith; Kevin A Zand; Edward Florez; Reza Sirous; Darya Shlapak; Frederico Souza; Manohar Roda; Jason Bryan; Amit Vasanji; Michael Griswold; Seth T Lirette
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Transarterial Radioembolization with Yttrium-90 for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Joseph Ralph Kallini; Ahmed Gabr; Riad Salem; Robert J Lewandowski
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 3.845

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Artificial intelligence in assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma treatment response.

Authors:  Bradley Spieler; Carl Sabottke; Ahmed W Moawad; Ahmed M Gabr; Mustafa R Bashir; Richard Kinh Gian Do; Vahid Yaghmai; Radu Rozenberg; Marielia Gerena; Joseph Yacoub; Khaled M Elsayes
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-03-31

2.  Atlas-based liver segmentation for nonhuman primate research.

Authors:  Jeffrey Solomon; Nina Aiosa; Dara Bradley; Marcelo A Castro; Syed Reza; Christopher Bartos; Philip Sayre; Ji Hyun Lee; Jennifer Sword; Michael R Holbrook; Richard S Bennett; Dima A Hammoud; Reed F Johnson; Irwin Feuerstein
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Semi-automatic quantitative analysis of the pelvic bony structures on apparent diffusion coefficient maps based on deep learning: establishment of reference ranges.

Authors:  Xiang Liu; Chao Han; Ziying Lin; Zhaonan Sun; Yaofeng Zhang; Xiangpeng Wang; Xiaodong Zhang; Xiaoying Wang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-01

4.  Polycystic liver: automatic segmentation using deep learning on CT is faster and as accurate compared to manual segmentation.

Authors:  Bénédicte Cayot; Laurent Milot; Olivier Nempont; Anna S Vlachomitrou; Carole Langlois-Jacques; Jérôme Dumortier; Olivier Boillot; Karine Arnaud; Thijs R M Barten; Joost P H Drenth; Pierre-Jean Valette
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Automated CT Staging of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Severity for Predicting Disease Progression and Mortality with a Deep Learning Convolutional Neural Network.

Authors:  Kyle A Hasenstab; Nancy Yuan; Tara Retson; Douglas J Conrad; Seth Kligerman; David A Lynch; Albert Hsiao
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2021-04-08

6.  Machine learning enables new insights into genetic contributions to liver fat accumulation.

Authors:  Mary E Haas; James P Pirruccello; Samuel N Friedman; Minxian Wang; Connor A Emdin; Veeral H Ajmera; Tracey G Simon; Julian R Homburger; Xiuqing Guo; Matthew Budoff; Kathleen E Corey; Alicia Y Zhou; Anthony Philippakis; Patrick T Ellinor; Rohit Loomba; Puneet Batra; Amit V Khera
Journal:  Cell Genom       Date:  2021-12-08

7.  An automated liver segmentation in liver iron concentration map using fuzzy c-means clustering combined with anatomical landmark data.

Authors:  Kittichai Wantanajittikul; Pairash Saiviroonporn; Suwit Saekho; Rungroj Krittayaphong; Vip Viprakasit
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 1.930

8.  Deep Learning CT-based Quantitative Visualization Tool for Liver Volume Estimation: Defining Normal and Hepatomegaly.

Authors:  Alberto A Perez; Victoria Noe-Kim; Meghan G Lubner; Peter M Graffy; John W Garrett; Daniel C Elton; Ronald M Summers; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Repeatability and accuracy of various region-of-interest sampling strategies for hepatic MRI proton density fat fraction quantification.

Authors:  Cheng William Hong; Jennifer Y Cui; Danielle Batakis; Yang Xu; Tanya Wolfson; Anthony C Gamst; Alexandra N Schlein; Lindsey M Negrete; Michael S Middleton; Gavin Hamilton; Rohit Loomba; Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Kathryn J Fowler; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-02-20

Review 10.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging for chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Guilherme Moura Cunha; Patrick J Navin; Kathryn J Fowler; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Richard L Ehman; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.629

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.