| Literature DB >> 32582657 |
Xi Zhang1,2, Wentao Shu3, Qinghua Yu2, Wenrui Qu1, Yinan Wang3,4, Rui Li1.
Abstract
The increasing number of patients with chronic wounds caused by diseases, such as diabetes, malignant tumors, infections, and vasculopathy, has caused severe economic and social burdens. The main clinical treatments for chronic wounds include the systemic use of antibiotics, changing dressings frequently, operative debridement, and flap repair. These routine therapeutic strategies are characterized by a long course of treatment, substantial trauma, and high costs, and fail to produce satisfactory results. Biomaterial dressings targeting the different stages of the pathophysiology of chronic wounds have become an active research topic in recent years. In this review, after providing an overview of the epidemiology of chronic wounds, and the pathophysiological characteristics of chronic wounds, we highlight the functional biomaterials that can enhance chronic wound healing through debridement, anti-infection and antioxidant effects, immunoregulation, angiogenesis, and extracellular matrix remodeling. It is hoped that functional biomaterials will resolve the treatment dilemma for chronic wounds and improve patient quality of life.Entities:
Keywords: angiogenesis; antioxidant; chronic wound; functional biomaterials; immunoregulation
Year: 2020 PMID: 32582657 PMCID: PMC7283526 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00516
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
Scheme 1Functional biomaterials for repair of chronic wounds.
Modern functional biomaterial dressings for chronic wounds.
| Debridement | Sterigel® | Patients with pressure ulcers | The debridement effect was similar to that of a traditional carboxymethyl cellulose-based hydrogel, but the ability to absorb exudates was limited | Williams, | |
| Polyacrylate | Protease | Patients with venous ulcers | Compared with an amorphous hydrogel, protease/polyacrylate more effectively removed necrotic tissue and granulation tissue. | Humbert et al., | |
| Anti-infection | CuS nanodots | 0.7 cm circular wounds in diabetic mice | Non-healing MRSA-infected wounds treated with CuS nanodots combined with laser irradiation were healing after 12 days | Qiao et al., | |
| AgNP/PAAS CMC | Calculus bovis | 1.0 cm circular wounds in diabetic rats | The two-stage dressing promoted tissue repair in S. aureus-infected wounds | He et al., | |
| TPP-loaded Tecophilic® | Patients with chronic leg ulcers | Reduced the area of chronic ulcers and effectively reduced pain | Arenbergerova et al., | ||
| Antioxidant | PPCN | SDF-1 | Splinted 0.6 cm circular wounds in diabetic mice | The antioxidant PPCN hydrogel could promote epidermal and appendage regeneration, combined with SDF-1 to further improve the repair effect; wounds were closed by day 24 | Zhu et al., |
| Alginate | Edaravone | 0.5 cm circular wounds in diabetic rats | The therapeutic effect was dose-dependent, which proved the dual role of ROS in chronic wound healing. | Fan et al., | |
| PEI25K, Ceria, Col | AntagomiR-26a | 1.5 cm circular wounds in diabetic rats | The PCN-miR/Col treatment promoted wound healing in diabetic rats, and the quality of repaired skin including Col and skin appendage was similar to that of normal skin | Wu et al., | |
| Immunoregulation | KSiNPs | 0.7 cm circular wounds in diabetic mice | KSiNPs group promoted wound healing in diabetic mice through M2 macrophage polarization | Gan et al., | |
| PVA/CS | Bee venom | 1.8 cm circular wounds in diabetic rats | Wounds in the bee venom loaded PVA/CS hydrogel group were basically healed in day 21, and animals had lower IL-6 levels | Amin and Abdel-Raheem, | |
| Angiogenesis | HA | VEGF- plasmid | Splinted 0.6 cm circular wounds in diabetic mice | HA hydrogel with pores of 60 μm in diameter had the strongest granulation formation and healing ability, but the combination of VEGF plasmids did not further enhance the regeneration of granulation tissue | Tokatlian et al., |
| GH | IL-8, MIP-3α | 1.0 cm circular wounds in diabetic mice | IL-8-loaded GH hydrogel exhibited stronger repair-promoting neovascularization, and wound healing ability than the MIP-3α treatment | Yoon et al., | |
| PLLA, silica NPs | DMOG | 0.8 cm circular wounds in diabetic mice | The treatment effectively promoted wound healing and neovascularization in diabetic mice | Ren et al., | |
| ECM remodeling | Col | Patients with venous leg ulcers | Commercial ovine-derived Col dressing cured 50% of venous ulcers in 12 weeks | Liden and May, | |
| Poly 2/DS, CS | siRNA | 0.6 cm circular wounds in diabetic mice | In the MMP-9 gene silencing group, the content of type I Col increased and wound healing was accelerated | Castleberry et al., |
Figure 1Antibacterial effect of laser-activated CuS nanodots. (A) Schematic diagram of CuS nanodots combined with laser irradiation to enhance antibacterial effect. (B) Wound images of MRSA-infected diabetic wound in mice. (C) Quantitative analysis of wound areas. ***p < 0.001. Reproduced with permission from Qiao et al. (2019).
Figure 2PCN-miR/Col hydrogel exerts antioxidant and neovascularization properties to promote healing of oxidative diabetes wound. (A) Schematic of PCN-miR/Col hydrogel preparation, antioxidation, and vascularization in chronic wounds. (B) In vivo results of ROS by immunofluorescence. (C) Quantitative analysis of results shown in (B). *p < 0.05. (D) Masson staining images from day 28 post-operation. Scale bars, 100 μm. Reproduced with permission from Wu et al. (2019).
Figure 3KSiNPs activate macrophages to differentiate into M2 phenotypes and promote wound healing. (A) Schematic of the mechanism by which KSiNPs promote chronic wound healing. (B) Immunofluorescence identification of macrophages in each experimental group 7 days post-operation. Scale bars, 20 μm. (C) Quantitative analysis of the results from (B), showing that the proportion of M2 macrophages in the KSiNP group increased. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. (D) Flow cytometry detection of macrophage activation status in different groups of wounds on day 7. Reproduced with permission from Gan et al. (2019).
Figure 4DMOG-loaded PLLA electrospun membrane dressing promotes chronic wound angiogenesis. (A) Schematic of material preparation and angiogenesis-promoting mechanism. (B) Immunofluorescence CD31 staining images of wounds 7 days post-operation. Scale bar, 100 μm. (C) Quantitative analysis of the results shown in (B). **P < 0.01. Reproduced with permission from Li et al. (2018).
Figure 5Silencing the MMP-9 gene accelerates the healing of chronic wounds through ECM remodeling. (A) Chemical structures of the materials used in the dressing, and schematic diagram of the double coatings fabricated by LbL self-assembly; X and Y represent the number of layers of Poly 2/DS and CS/siRNA, respectively. (B) Schematic of the in vivo experiments. (C) Post-operative photographs of wounds areas. Scale bar, 5 mm. (D) Sirius Red staining images of Col tissue infiltration and fusion with wound edges. UD, undamaged dermis. GT, granulation tissue. Scale bars, 75 μm. Reproduced with permission from Castleberry et al. (2016).