| Literature DB >> 32582593 |
Jessie R Maxwell1,2, Amber J Zimmerman2, Nathaniel Pavlik1, Jessie C Newville2, Katherine Carlin3, Shenandoah Robinson4, Jonathan L Brigman2, Frances J Northington3, Lauren L Jantzie3,5,6.
Abstract
Neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) remains a common problem world-wide for infants born at term. The impact of HIE on long-term outcomes, especially into adulthood, is not well-described. To facilitate identification of biobehavioral biomarkers utilizing a translational platform, we sought to investigate the impact of HIE on executive function and cognitive outcomes into adulthood utilizing a murine model of HIE. HIE mice (unilateral common carotid artery occlusion to induce ischemia, followed by hypoxia with a FiO2 of 0.08 for 45 min) and control mice were tested on discrimination and reversal touchscreen tasks (using their noses) shown to be sensitive to loss of basal ganglia or cortical function, respectively. We hypothesized that the HIE injury would result in deficits in reversal learning, revealing complex cognitive and executive functioning impairments. Following HIE, mice had a mild discrimination impairment as measured by incorrect responses but were able to learn the paradigm to similar levels as controls. During reversal, HIE mice required significantly more total trials, errors and correction trials across the paradigm. Analysis of specific stages showed that reversal impairments in HIE were driven by significant increases in all measured parameters during the late learning, striatal-mediated portion of the task. Together, these results support the concept that HIE occurring during the neonatal period results in abnormal neurodevelopment that persists into adulthood, which can impact efficient associated learning. Further, these data show that utilization of an established model of HIE coupled with touchscreen learning provides valuable information for screening therapeutic interventions that could mitigate these deficits to improve the long-term outcomes of this vulnerable population.Entities:
Keywords: HIE; biobehavioral biomarker; cognitive flexibility; learning acquisition; reversal learning; touchscreen
Year: 2020 PMID: 32582593 PMCID: PMC7291343 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2020.00289
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pediatr ISSN: 2296-2360 Impact factor: 3.418
Figure 1Timeline of experimental design. Mice randomized to the HIE group underwent the carotid artery ligation and hypoxia chamber exposure at postnatal day 10 (P10). Following recovery, the touchscreen cognitive testing started with pretraining, followed by discrimination and reversal tasks in both sham and HIE groups. During pretraining, mice became familiar with the chamber and the food reward system. In discrimination, one symbol was the correct answer, which would result in a food reward if chosen. During reversal, the symbol that was previously correct became the incorrect response.
Figure 2Visual discrimination revealed more incorrect trials in the HIE group compared to sham. During visual discrimination, the total number of trials between the sham and the HIE group were not significantly different (A). The HIE group did require significantly more incorrect trials to complete the visual discrimination component compared to sham (B). Although the HIE group had more correction trials during visual discrimination, this was not significant (C). There was no difference in either the reaction time or magazine latency between the two groups during visual discrimination (D) (n = 13–15, *p < 0.05). Data is represented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).
Figure 3HIE induces reversal learning Deficits. The HIE group required significantly more trials to complete reversal compared to the sham group (A), as well as more incorrect responses during reversal (B). Additionally, the HIE group completed significantly more correction trials compared to the sham group (C). There was no difference in either the reaction time or magazine latency between the two groups during reversal (D) (n = 13–15, *p < 0.05). Data is represented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).
Figure 4HIE yields distinct early phase and learning phase reversal deficits. In the early phase of reversal, there were no significant differences between HIE and sham in the total trials completed, the total incorrect, and the number of correction trials (A–C). However, in the learning phase of reversal, the HIE group had significantly more total trials (D), more incorrect trials (E) and more correction trials (F) compared to sham (n = 13–15, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01). Data is represented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).