| Literature DB >> 32582389 |
Yvonne-Mary Papamerkouriou1, Pantelis Tsoumpos2, George Tagaris2, George Christodoulou2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Proximal tibial metaphyseal fractures can be complicated by a late valgus deformity, referred to as Cozen's phenomenon. We studied children with such fractures to determine whether the child's age at the time of injury influenced the development of Cozen's as well as the occurrence of elongation. In addition, we explored whether the deformity resolved at long-term follow-up.Entities:
Keywords: Cozen’s phenomenon; age; children; elongation; proximal tibial metaphyseal fractures; valgus deformity
Year: 2020 PMID: 32582389 PMCID: PMC7302407 DOI: 10.1302/1863-2548.14.190147
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Child Orthop ISSN: 1863-2521 Impact factor: 1.548
Results: patient demographics, angulation (°) post-treatment (first measurement), at maximum deformity (second measurement) and final follow-up (third measurement) of fractured and uninjured limb
| Count | Percentage (%) | Mean | Range | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 20 | 60 | ||
| Female | 13 | 39 | ||
| Age, years | 6.8 | 13.5 | ||
| Fractured limb (first measurement) | 3.0 | 16.0 | ||
| Fractured limb (second measurement) | 5.8 | 23.0 | ||
| Fractured limb (third measurement) | 3.1 | 16.0 | ||
| Uninjured limb (first measurement) | 2.5 | 12.0 | ||
| Uninjured limb (second measurement) | 2.2 | 12.0 | ||
| Uninjured limb (third measurement) | 1.2 | 11.0 | ||
| Elongation, cm | .6 | 1.5 | ||
Fig. 1.Age follow-up graph including: age of the children when treated; age of the patients at final follow-up; and years of follow-up. Children’s ages have been rounded to the nearest integer.
Fig. 2.Four-year-old patient, right uninjured limb at time of injury.
Fig. 6.The 25-year follow-up X-rays of right and left limb. Left injured limb has a remaining angulation of 5° compared with the right uninjured side.
Cozen patients’ characteristics
| Age | Type of fracture | Treatment | Fracture angulation | F 1st M | U 1st M | F 2nd M | U 2nd M | F 3rd M | U 3rd M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Hairline | Cast | 5 | 5 | 5 | 13 | 5 | 4 | 0 |
| 2 | Torus | Cast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| 3 | Greenstick | Cast | 10 | 10 | 8 | 16 | 8 | 4 | 0 |
| 3 | Greenstick | Reduction, cast wedging | 16 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 7 | 8 | 4 |
| 3 | Greenstick | Cast | 7 | 7 | 7 | 11 | 7 | 7 | 3 |
| 3 | Greenstick | Reduction, cast wedging | 8 | 4 | 4 | 18 | 5 | 9 | 3 |
| 4 | Greenstick | Reduction, cast wedging | 24 | 8 | 8 | 19 | 6 | 5 | 0 |
| 5 | Greenstick | Cast | 7 | 7 | 5 | 14 | 5 | 5 | 0 |
| 7 | Complete | Reduction, cast wedging | 14 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 0 |
| 7 | Greenstick | Reduction, cast | 12 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 2 | 8 | 4 |
| 7 | Complete | Cast | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| 7 | Complete | ORIF k-w | 25 | 12 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 10 | 6 |
| 9 | Complete | ORIF k-w | 10 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| 10 | Greenstick | Reduction, cast wedging | 20 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| 13 | Complete | Reduction, cast | −5 | −2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
negative values refer to varus angulation, reduction was performed under general anesthetic
F, fractured limb; U, uninjured limb; 1st M, first measurement after treatment; 2nd M, second measurement at maximum deformity; 3rd M, third measurement at final follow-up; ORIF, Open Reduction Internal Fixation; k-w, Kirschner-wire.
Children’s ages have been rounded to the nearest integer.
Fig. 7.Box plots of valgus angle of injured limb post-treatment, at maximum deformity, at final follow-up
Fig. 8.Box plots of difference in the valgus angle between injured and uninjured limb post-treatment, at maximum deformity, at final follow-up