| Literature DB >> 32582387 |
Zhang Fan1, Luo Cong2, Liu Hang2, Li Ming2, Wu Jun2, Hu Zujie2, Li Haoyu3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Despite the early diagnosis and treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), some older children still need open reduction. It is usually difficult to get a satisfactory reduction particularly in patients with acetabular defect. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes of acetabulum reaming and sartorius muscle pedicle iliac bone grafting in the treatment of older children with DDH and acetabular defect.Entities:
Keywords: acetabular defect; acetabular ream; dysplasia of the hip; iliac bone flap with sartorius
Year: 2020 PMID: 32582387 PMCID: PMC7302418 DOI: 10.1302/1863-2548.14.190116
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Child Orthop ISSN: 1863-2521 Impact factor: 1.548
Fig. 1.Diagrams illustrate sartorius muscle pedicle iliac bone grafting to repair acetabular defects and ream the acetabulum: a) acetabular defect/false acetabulum and proliferating cartilage tissues; b) sartorius muscle pedicle iliac bone and ream of the acetabulum; c) sartorius muscle pedicle iliac bone graft and repair of the acetabular defect. The acetabulum covered the femur head appropriately.
Fig. 2.Surgical technique: a) and b) obtaining the sartorius iliac crest flap; c) and d) acetabulum reaming; e) sartorius muscle pedicle iliac bone graft for repairing the acetabular defect.
The McKay criteria[13]
| Grade | Description |
|---|---|
|
| Stable, painless hip, no limp, negative Trendelenburg sign and a full range of movement |
|
| Stable, painless hip, slight limp, negative Trendelenburg sign and a slight decrease in range of movement |
|
| Stable, painless hip, limp, positive Trendelenburg sign and limitation of movement |
|
| Unstable or painful hip, or both; positive Trendelenburg sign |
Follow-up data of cases
| Case | Sex | Age (mths) | Follow-up(mths) | Side | Tonnis grade | ST-L (cm) | Preoperative AI (°) | Final-FU AI (°) | Final FU CEA (°) | Final FU AHI | Complications | Severin grade | McKay grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M | 86 | 35 | R | IV | 1.5 | 39.7 | 19.7 | 40.5 | 1.05 | I | II | |
| 2 | M | 78 | 44 | R | IV | 1 | 33.1 | 7.3 | 43.6 | 1.04 | I | I | |
| 3 | M | 138 | 26 | R | IV | 1.5 | 41.4 | 14.2 | 41.6 | 0.96 | RD | I | III |
| 4 | M | 153 | 29 | L | IV | 1 | 40.5 | 8.9 | 70.3 | 1.2 | II | II | |
| 5 | M | 139 | 29 | L | II | 1.5 | 22.2 | 9.4 | 43.6 | 0.92 | I | I | |
| 6 | F | 127 | 41 | L | IV | 0 | 39.6 | 11.7 | 46.3 | 1.07 | II | I | |
| 7 | F | 134 | 35 | L | IV | 2 | 48.3 | 9.3 | 48.7 | 1.18 | II | II | |
| 8 | F | 90 | 31 | L | III | 1 | 49.4 | 15.6 | 39 | 0.88 | II | III | |
| 9 | F | 84 | 26 | R | IV | 0.5 | 35.6 | 14.5 | 47.4 | 0.97 | II | I | |
| 10 | F | 123 | 25 | L | IV | 1.5 | 47.7 | 10.5 | 40.2 | 0.96 | II | II | |
| 11 | F | 168 | 25 | R | II | 1 | 25.6 | 9.9 | 44.3 | 1.02 | I | I | |
| 12 | F | 85 | 24 | R | IV | 1 | 44.7 | 22 | 37.5 | 0.88 | AVN | III | II |
| 13 | F | 130 | 29 | L | III | 1 | 28.6 | 20.5 | 37.8 | 0.98 | I | I | |
| 14[ | F | 77 | 36 | L | II | 0.5 | 24.2 | 7.8 | 44 | 1.03 | I | I | |
| 15[ | F | 82 | 31 | R | IV | 0.5 | 17.5 | 8.6 | 53.9 | 1.17 | I | II | |
| 16[ | F | 125 | 39 | L | III | 2 | 24.6 | 10.7 | 48.4 | 0.98 | I | I | |
| 17[ | F | 118 | 46 | R | IV | 1.5 | 25.3 | 16.6 | 48.7 | 1.28 | I | I |
hip 14 and hip 15 belong to the same patient, a female with bilateral developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH)
hip 16 and hip 17 belong to the same patient, a female with bilateral DDH
ST-L, shortening length; AI, acetabular index; FU, follow-up; CEA, centre-edge angle; AHI, acetabular head index; RD, redislocation; AVN, avascular necrosis
Fig. 3.Female patient diagnosed with developmental dysplasia of the right hip. Surgery was performed at the age of seven years: a) preoperative radiograph; b) six weeks after surgery; c) 13 months after surgery; d), e), f) and g) functional imaging 13 months after surgery.
Fig. 4.Female patient diagnosed with bilateral developmental dysplasia of the hip. Surgery of the right hip was performed at nine years, nine months old, and surgery of the left hip was performed at ten years, four months old: a) preoperative radiograph; b), c), d) and e) radiographs during a follow-up; f) radiograph after removing the internal fixation; g), h) and i) functional imaging.