| Literature DB >> 32582030 |
Adalbert Raimann1, Sarah N Mehany2, Patricia Feil3, Michael Weber2, Peter Pietschmann4, Andrea Boni-Mikats2, Radka Klepochova5, Martin Krššák5,6,7, Gabriele Häusler1, Johannes Schneider8, Janina M Patsch1,2, Kay Raum8.
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the diagnostic potential of bidirectional axial transmission (BDAT) ultrasound, and high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) in X-linked hypophosphatemia (XLH, OMIM #307800), a rare genetic disorder of phosphate metabolism caused by mutations in the PHEX gene.Entities:
Keywords: HR-pQCT; XLH; axial transmission; bone; hypophosphatemia; rare disease; rickets; ultrasound
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32582030 PMCID: PMC7296046 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00355
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 5.555
Descriptive statistics of XLH patients.
| Basic clinical parameters | Age (yr) | 12.9 ± 5.8 [13.4] | |
| Sex (f/m) | 7/1 | ||
| Body height (cm) | 135.0 ± 23.3 [145.4] | ||
| Body height SDS | −2.2 ± 1.1 [−2.0] | ||
| BMI SDS | 0.58 ± 1.06 [0.99] | ||
| Body ratio (sitting height/leg length) SD | 1.7 ± 1.3 [1.65] | ||
| Laboratory parameters | Serum Ca (mmol/L) | 2.3 ± 0.1 [2.3] | 2–12 y: 2.2–2.7; 12–18 y: 2.1–2.55 |
| Serum P (mmol/L) | 0.88 ± 0.11 [0.9] | 1–12 y: 1.0–2.3; > 12 y: 0.81–1.45 | |
| PTH (pg/mL) | 51.48 ± 20.08 [48.2] | 15–65 pg/ml | |
| 25D (nmol/L) | 50.74 ± 22.60 [51.1] | > 50 nmol/L | |
| 1,25D (pg/mL) | 44.88 ± 18.19 [45] | 19.9–79.3 pg/ml | |
| ALP (U/L) | 309.13 ± 174.40 [360] | Age-specific according to ( | |
| Urinary parameters | Ca/Crea ratio | 0.20 ± 0.28 [0.115] | <0.70 mmol/mmol |
| TmP/GFR (mmol/L) | 0.73 ± 0.08 [0.69] | 1.15–2.44 | |
| Treatment | Phosphat (mg/kg KG/d) | 40.25 ± 15.16 [40.06] | |
| Calcitriol (ng/kg KG/d) | 19.47 ± 12.62 [21.13] | ||
| Treatment duration (y) | 11.63 ± 5.3 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SD [median].
Figure 1Principle of bi-directional axial ultrasound transmission. The ultrasound transducer consists of two emitter arrays and one receiver array separated by gel filled gap regions (dimensions are given in mm). The numerical sound propagation simulation shows an ultrasound pulse emitted at element 3 of emitter array 1, which propagates through skin and soft tissue into the bone. One part of the wave is transmitted into the medullary canal and other parts propagate as compressional and dispersive guided waves in the axial bone direction through the cortical shell. These waves leak acoustic waves back into the soft tissue which are detected by the central receiver array.
Figure 2Ultrasound measurement locations. The landmarks used for the identification of the longitudinal positions are marked by red dots. (Adapted from Servier Medical Art by Servier under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License).
Figure 3Ultrasound signals recorded at the receiver array after the excitation of a signal from one emitter (A). For each receiver element, the first arriving signal exceeding the noise floor (magenta) is time-gated (green) and the time-of-flight of the first peak (red crosses) is detected. Pulse travel times linearly increasing with emitter-receiver distance are used to calculate the propagation velocity in this direction (B). Other signals [the encircled signal of receiver channel 1 in (A)], were automatically excluded. From the distribution of all measured velocities, the peak position was used for further evaluation.
Figure 4Results of quantitative ultrasound at the radius (A) and the tibia (B).
Figure 5Representative axial and coronal HR-pQCT images of the ultradistal tibia of XLH patients (n = 2; A,B) compared to healthy controls (n = 2; C,D). Images marked with the same letter belong to the same individual.
Results of HR-pQCT in XLH patients and controls.
| Ct.BMD (mg HA/cm3) | 676 ± 105 | 651 ± 98 | 0.742 | −3.7 |
| Ct.Th (mm) | 0.72 ± 0.10 | 0.74 ± 0.10 | 0.809 | 2.8 |
| BV/TV | 0.13 ± 0.03 | 0.15 ± 0.03 | 0.384 | 15.4 |
| Tb.N (1/mm) | 2.12 ± 0.45 | 1.98 ± 0.30 | 0.611 | −6.6 |
| Tb.Th (mm) | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 0.118 | 33.3 |
| Tb.Sp (mm) | 0.43 ± 0.12 | 0.44 ± 0.09 | 0.888 | 2.3 |
| Tb.1/N.SD (mm) | 0.17 ± 0.06 | 0.19 ± 0.06 | 0.607 | 11.8 |
| Ct.PoV (mm3) | 1.36 ± 0.83 | 0.54 ± 0.34 | 0.115 | −60.3 |
| Ct.Po (%) | 0.28 ± 0.17 | 0.17 ± 0.18 | 0.403 | −33.3 |
| Po.Dm (mm) | 0.15 ± 0.03 | 0.14 ± 0.03 | 0.591 | −6.7 |
| Dm.SD (mm) | 0.07 ± 0.03 | 0.06 ± 0.03 | 0.665 | −14.3 |
| Ct.BMD (mg HA/cm3) | 651 ± 80 | 692 ± 79 | 0.499 | 6.2 |
| Ct.Th (mm) | 0.69 ± 0.10 | 0.82 ± 0.05 | 0.061 | 18.8 |
| BV/TV | 0.15 ± 0.02 | 0.13 ± 0.04 | 0.424 | −13.3 |
| Tb.N (1/mm) | 2.33 ± 0.41 | 1.72 ± 0.60 | 0.147 | −26.2 |
| Tb.Th (mm) | 0.06 ± 0.00 | 0.07 ± 0.00 | 16.7 | |
| Tb.Sp (mm) | 0.38 ± 0.08 | 0.59 ± 0.34 | 0.252 | 55.3 |
| Tb.1/N.SD (mm) | 0.15 ± 0.04 | 0.31 ± 0.25 | 0.245 | 106.7 |
| Ct.PoV (mm3) | 4.10 ± 3.01 | 3.32 ± 4.87 | 0.793 | −19.0 |
| Ct.Po (%) | 0.55 ± 0.32 | 0.38 ± 0.54 | 0.592 | −33.3 |
| Po.Dm (mm) | 0.15 ± 0.01 | 0.18 ± 0.03 | 0.092 | 20.0 |
| Dm.SD (mm) | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.10 ± 0.05 | 0.174 | 66.7 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SD. Bold font* indicates a significant difference.