| Literature DB >> 32581866 |
Nobutoshi Nawa1,2,3, Kazuaki Nakamura4, Takeo Fujiwara1,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Children who are exposed to natural disasters are at greater risk of developing mental and behavior problems. Prior studies have suggested that positive parenting practices could prevent child mental and behavior problems among those who were exposed to natural disasters. Parent-child interaction increases oxytocin level in parents and infants; however, studies assessing the change in oxytocin level after positive parent-child interaction and its effect on child behavior problems among preadolescents who were exposed to natural disasters are lacking. This study investigated whether playful interaction stimulated oxytocin levels in 34 mother-child dyads who experienced the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake in Kesennuma City in Miyagi Prefecture, Japan, and the effect of the maternal oxytocin changes on child behavior problems.Entities:
Keywords: child behavior problems; heart rate variability; oxytocin; parenting; the Great East Japan Earthquake
Year: 2020 PMID: 32581866 PMCID: PMC7283446 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00477
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychiatry ISSN: 1664-0640 Impact factor: 4.157
Figure 2Intervention: Playful Mother–Child Interaction. Intervention protocol with representative images for each procedure was shown.
Figure 1Study protocol. Study protocol from time point zero (T0) to time point five (T5).
Characteristics of sample population.
| Variable | Total (n=33) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| N or Mean | % or SD | ||
| Maternal characteristics | |||
| Age in 2014 | Mean (years old) | 38.5 | 5.1 |
| House damaged | Yes | 16 | 48.5 |
| No | 17 | 51.5 | |
| Missing | 0 | 0 | |
| Lived in a shelter | Yes | 14 | 42.4 |
| No | 17 | 51.5 | |
| Missing | 2 | 6.1 | |
| Witnessed tsunami | Yes | 22 | 66.7 |
| No | 10 | 30.3 | |
| Missing | 1 | 3.0 | |
| Heard the explosion of multiple oil tanks | Yes | 16 | 48.5 |
| No | 14 | 42.4 | |
| Cannot answer | 1 | 3.0 | |
| Missing | 2 | 6.1 | |
| K6 | ≤ 4 | 23 | 69.7 |
| ≥ 5 | 9 | 27.3 | |
| Missing | 1 | 3 | |
| Child characteristics | |||
| Age in 2014 | Mean (years old) | 8.8 | 0.9 |
| Sex | Male | 13 | 39.4 |
| Female | 20 | 60.6 | |
| Birth order | 1st | 17 | 51.5 |
| ≥ 2nd | 14 | 42.4 | |
| Missing | 2 | 6.1 | |
Mean oxytocin level of mothers and children at each time point.
| Pre-experiment | Pre-interactionperiod (control period) | Change of pre-interaction period | Post-interaction Period | Change of post-interaction period | Change by playful interaction (interaction effect) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | ||||||
| Mean | 13.17 | 10.14 | 9.31 | -0.83 | 9.47 | 10.06 | 0.60 | |||
| SD or SE | 8.79 | 4.27 | 4.00 | 0.43 | 4.93 | 4.82 | 0.46 | 0.61 | ||
| Mean | 11.75 | 9.95 | 8.72 | -1.23 | 9.48 | 10.88 | 1.40 | |||
| SD or SE | 6.65 | 4.28 | 3.15 | 0.78 | 4.77 | 5.85 | 0.89 | 1.00 | ||
| Mean | 14.10 | 10.26 | 9.69 | -0.56 | 9.46 | 9.53 | 0.07 | 0.63 | 0.87 | 0.40 |
| SD or SE | 10.00 | 4.36 | 4.50 | 0.50 | 5.15 | 4.09 | 0.47 | 0.73 | ||
| Mean | 10.50 | 9.63 | 9.42 | -0.22 | 9.55 | 8.83 | -0.71 | -0.50 | -1.05 | 0.30 |
| SD or SE | 4.19 | 4.06 | 3.18 | 0.45 | 3.45 | 2.29 | 0.45 | 0.47 | ||
| Mean | 10.52 | 10.10 | 10.70 | 0.60 | 9.53 | 9.94 | 0.41 | -0.19 | -0.32 | 0.76 |
| SD or SE | 2.86 | 2.30 | 2.64 | 0.48 | 1.45 | 1.62 | 0.50 | 0.60 | ||
| Mean | 10.50 | 9.39 | 8.74 | -0.64 | 9.56 | 8.25 | -1.31 | -0.66 | -1.00 | 0.33 |
| SD or SE | 4.82 | 4.77 | 3.30 | 0.63 | 4.18 | 2.41 | 0.60 | 0.66 | ||
Saliva oxytocin values are in pg/mg protein. T, time point.
P < 0.05 by paired t-test (two-sided).
standard error was displayed.
Figure 3Maternal oxytocin response following playful mother–child interaction. (A) Change in maternal oxytocin levels by playful mother–child interaction by stratifying by child sex. *P < 0.05. (B) Change in maternal oxytocin levels by playful mother–child interaction by stratifying according to sex of the child as well as the birth order of the child. *P < 0.05. (C) Change in maternal oxytocin levels by playful mother–child interaction by stratifying by the presence of damage to the house by the earthquake. *P < 0.05. (D) Change in maternal oxytocin levels by playful mother–child interaction by stratifying by maternal experience of having lived in a shelter after the earthquake. *P < 0.05. (E) Change in maternal oxytocin levels by playful mother–child interaction by stratifying by the maternal experience of having witnessed tsunami after the earthquake. *P < 0.05. (F) Change in maternal oxytocin levels by playful mother–child interaction by stratifying by the maternal experience of having heard the explosion of multiple oil tanks after the earthquake. *P < 0.05. (G) Change in maternal oxytocin levels by playful mother–child interaction by stratifying by maternal psychological distress as assessed by K6 score (≤4 vs ≥5). *P < 0.05. (H) Change in maternal oxytocin levels by playful mother–child interaction by stratifying by maternal psychological distress as assessed by K6 score (≤4 vs ≥5) and the presence of damage to the house by the earthquake. *P < 0.05. All data and graph bars are expressed as the mean ± standard error. Saliva oxytocin values are in pg/mg protein.
Figure 4Child oxytocin response following playful mother–child interaction. (A) Change in child oxytocin levels by playful mother–child interaction by stratifying by sex of the child. (B) Change in child oxytocin levels by playful mother–child interaction by stratifying by sex of the child as well as the birth order of the child. (C) Change in child oxytocin levels by playful mother–child interaction by stratifying by the presence of damage to the house by the earthquake. (D) Change in child oxytocin levels by playful mother–child interaction by stratifying by the maternal experience of having lived in a shelter after the earthquake. (E) Change in child oxytocin levels by playful mother–child interaction by stratifying by maternal psychological distress as assessed by K6 score (≤4 vs ≥5). All data and graph bars are expressed as the mean ± standard error. Saliva oxytocin values are in pg/mg protein.
Changes in heart rate variability measures among mothers and children.
| All samples | Boys | Girls | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (95%CI) | Mean (95%CI) | Mean (95%CI) | |
| (n=32 | (n=12 | (n=20 | |
| RMSSD | 0.16 (-3.39, 3.71) | 1.50 (-2.45, 5.45) | -0.65 (-6.07, 4.77) |
| SDNN | 3.46 (-0.69, 7.61) | 4.51 (-1.94, 10.96) | 2.83 (-3.01, 8.66) |
| LF | 0.32 (-0.06, 0.71) | ||
| HF | -0.13 (-0.30, 0.05) | -0.17 (-0.51, 0.17) | -0.10 (-0.31, 0.11) |
| LF/HF | |||
| (n=25 | (n=8 | (n=17 | |
| RMSSD | 0.36 (-7.40, 8.12) | 7.75 (-14.81, 30.31) | -3.12 (-9.86, 3.62) |
| SDNN | 2.57 (-2.88, 8.02) | 5.36 (-8.78, 19.51) | 1.26 (-4.61, 7.13) |
| LF | -0.01 (-0.26, 0.24) | 0.05 (-0.31, 0.40) | -0.04 (-0.39, 0.31) |
| HF | -0.20 (-0.84, 0.45) | ||
| LF/HF | 0.05 (-0.02, 0.11) |
RMSSD, root mean square of successive differences; SDNN, standard deviation of all R-R intervals; LF, low frequencies; HF, high frequencies; LF/HF, low frequencies/high-frequencies ratio.
analysis was limited to the sample with complete information on the outcome measure.
measurements were analyzed in the log scale.
P < 0.05 by fixed effect regression analyses.
Association between maternal change in oxytocin level following mother–child interaction in 2015 and the CBCL score in 2 years in 2017 (n=14a).
| Crude | Model 1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | 95%CI | β | 95%CI | |
| CBCL total score | -1.11 | (-2.39, 0.16) | -1.25 | (-2.86, 0.36) |
| CBCL internalizing problem score | -0.82 | (-1.87, 0.23) | -0.59 | (-1.98, 0.80) |
| CBCL externalizing problem score | ||||
Bolded values indicate statistical significance at p < 0.05.
analysis was limited to the sample with complete information on the outcome measure.
adjusted for mothers' age, sex of the child, APQ, and child traumatic experience due to the earthquake.
beta value indicated the change in CBCL score in 2017 that was associated with one pg/mg protein increase of change in oxytocin level due to the mother–child interaction in 2015.
P < 0.05 by linear regression analyses.