Joonyoung Kim1, Chang-Min Lee2, Ha-Jung Kim1. 1. Department of Veterinary Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University, 77, Yongbong-ro, Buk-gu, Gwangju, 61186, Korea. 2. Department of Veterinary Laboratory Medicine, Chonnam National University, 77, Yongbong-ro, Buk-gu, Gwangju 61186, Korea.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine whether serum symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) and cystatin C (CysC) levels can be utilized as more accurate markers of early kidney dysfunction in dogs. Forty-one client-owned dogs with chronic kidney disease (CKD), which were clinically stable, and ten beagles as healthy controls were included. All dogs underwent physical examination, systemic blood pressure measurement, complete blood cell count, and plasma biochemistry analyses. Frozen serum was used for SDMA and CysC analyses. Data analysis was performed using Kruskal Wallis, Pearson's correlation, Bland-Altman plots, and receiver operating characteristic curve. SDMA and CysC levels were significantly higher in patients with CKD at various International Renal Interest Society (IRIS) stages than in the healthy controls. In particular, CysC level was the only biomarker that could indicate the earliest stage of CKD (IRIS stage I). Similar to these results, CysC level showed better sensitivity and specificity compared to the other biomarkers in early CKD dogs.
The aim of this study was to determine whether serum symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) and cystatin C (CysC) levels can be utilized as more accurate markers of early kidney dysfunction in dogs. Forty-one client-owned dogs with chronic kidney disease (CKD), which were clinically stable, and ten beagles as healthy controls were included. All dogs underwent physical examination, systemic blood pressure measurement, complete blood cell count, and plasma biochemistry analyses. Frozen serum was used for SDMA and CysC analyses. Data analysis was performed using Kruskal Wallis, Pearson's correlation, Bland-Altman plots, and receiver operating characteristic curve. SDMA and CysC levels were significantly higher in patients with CKD at various International Renal Interest Society (IRIS) stages than in the healthy controls. In particular, CysC level was the only biomarker that could indicate the earliest stage of CKD (IRIS stage I). Similar to these results, CysC level showed better sensitivity and specificity compared to the other biomarkers in early CKDdogs.
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is defined as the progressive loss of kidney function over
times. In order to determine kidney function, Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) has long been
considered the golden standard [11]. However, a direct
measurement of GFR is a time-consuming and labor-intensive process. Therefore, it is not
routinely used in clinical practice [5]. As an indirect
marker, such as plasma creatinine (CREA), serum symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA), and
Cystatin C (CysC) levels are measured to substitutions of kidney function.CREA is chosen by the International Renal Interest Society (IRIS) to evaluate and monitor
kidney function [15]. CREA levels can be affected by
age, sex, ethnicity, dietary protein intake, and lean body mass. Consequently, the sensitivity
of serum CREA level for the early stage of IRIS is limited. Although CREA metabolism and
measurement and its limitations have been reviewed in human medicine, similar reviews are
lacking in veterinary medicine [4] Therefore, in this
research CREA and the other indirect kidney factors are studied its correlations.SDMA is mainly filtered out from the kidneys so considered an accurate and sensitive
biomarker for estimating GFR in humans with coronary diseases and assessing renal dysfunction
in humans [12]. SDMA level is not influenced by muscle
mass, but some non-renal changes can affect the accuracy of its measurement [14]. SDMA serum concentration can be useful to detect CKD
in cat on average 17 months and dogs on average 9.8 months before CREA increase above the
reference rage [7, 8]. Whereas muscle mass, diet, inflammation, diabetes, and estrogen therapy have no
significant impacts on SDMA concentrations, obesity, sex, and age have effects on SDMA levels
[9, 12].CysC is a cysteine protease inhibitor that is filtered by the glomerulus and unaffected by
non-renal factors such as inflammation, age, and sex [11]. With greater sensitivity, serum CysC level has been replaced CREA as a marker
of GFR in humans [11]. In veterinary medicine,
measuring CysC concentration is also useful as an endogenous marker of indirect GFR than
plasma CREA concentration in dogs [1, 13, 18]. Dogs with
CKD show significantly higher CysC concentrations than healthy dogs [1, 13, 18] and dogs with various non-renal diseases (e.g., immune-mediated,
endocrine, dermatologic, cardiologic, or neoplastic diseases [2, 3, 10, 18].The aim of this study was to evaluate the CysC concentrations in various staged CKDdogs and
compare its efficacy as using a biomarker of kidney dysfunction to those of CREA and SDMA in
the same group. CysC measurement has not been widely used as much as CREA in small animal
veterinary practices; however, with growing interest its application, this study would be
meaningful for the first step.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals
Ten healthy beagles were included as controls. They were cared for and used in accordance
with the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Chonnam National
University. A total of 41 client-owned dogs were included for the study. They presented to
the hospital from 2017 to 2018 for medical check-ups, new diagnoses, or treatment of
current disorders. Only dogs with CKDs which were clinically stable were included in the
study. Pre- and post-renal conditions were ruled out. In particular, the IRIS stage I
patient group was classified as non-azotemic after dehydration correction, reduction of
urine specific gravity, SDMA, and CREA concentrations of sequentially collected sample
were classified by the IRIS staging system. Additionally, structural abnormalities
(degenerative changes, renal calculi, etc.) were also included. Unfortunately, IRIS stage
IV patientsdied during inpatient treatment. All ten healthy beagles were three-year-old
males. 15 dogs were <5 years of age, 10 dogs were 5–10 years of age, and 24 dogs were
>10 years of age (Table 1). Of the total 49 dogs, 10 were beagles; 10 were Shih Tzu; 7 were Maltese; 6
were Yorkshire terriers; 3 were Miniature poodles; 2 were of each of following breeds:
American cocker spaniel, dachshund, English cocker spaniel, Pomeranian, Miniature
schnauzer, and mixed; 1 was a Boston terrier. The characteristics of these 49 dogs are
presented in Table 1. For the accurate
evaluation of SDMA, all subject body condition scores are presented in Table 2.
Table 1.
The signalments for 49 dogs in the study
Total (n=49)
n
%
Gender
Intact male
11
22.4
Castrated male
13
26.5
Intact female
5
10.2
Spayed female
20
40.8
Age
<5 years
15
30.6
5–10 years
10
20.4
>10 years
24
49.0
Breeds
American Cocker Spaniel (10.0 kg a))
2
4.1
Beagle (11.24 kg a))
10
20.4
Boston Terrier (10.2 kg b))
1
2.0
Dachshund (8.3 kg a))
2
4.1
English Cocker Spaniel (9.85 kg a))
2
4.1
Maltese (3.73 kg a))
7
14.3
Mixed (6.4 kg a))
2
4.1
Pomeranian (3.9 kg a))
2
4.1
Miniature Poodle (3.38 kg a))
3
6.1
Miniature Schnauzer (7.65 kg a))
2
4.1
Shih Tzu (5.482 kg a))
10
20.4
Yorkshire Terrier (2.86 kg a))
6
12.2
a) Mean body weight; b) body weight.
Table 2.
Physical data in the study
Variable (unit)
Healthy control(n=10)
International Renal Interest Society stage
I(n=18)
II(n=7)
III(n=13)
IV(n=1)
BW (kg)
11.2 ± 0.93
5.20 ± 2.50a)
6.61 ± 1.86a)
4.90 ± 3.44a)
6.20 ± 0.00
BP (mmHg)
132 ± 8.83
150 ± 21.6a)
135 ± 18.8
153 ± 41.7
170 ± 0.00
HR (beats per min)
123 ± 12.7
144 ± 15.8a)
121 ± 30.6
147 ± 21.9a)
148 ± 0.00
BT (°C)
38.8 ± 0.45
38.4 ± 0.41a)
38.5 ± 0.94
37.9 ± 0.85a)
37.1 ± 0.00
BCS (1–9)
3.00 ± 0.00
4.70 ± 1.32a)
5.29 ± 1.25a)
4.54 ± 1.85a)
6.00 ± 0.00
a) P<0.05 healthy controls vs. IRIS groups by
t-test. BW, body weight; BP, blood pressure; HR, heart rate; HR,
heart rate; BT, body temperature; BCS, body condition score.
a) Mean body weight; b) body weight.a) P<0.05 healthy controls vs. IRIS groups by
t-test. BW, body weight; BP, blood pressure; HR, heart rate; HR,
heart rate; BT, body temperature; BCS, body condition score.
Categorization of concurrent diseases
The 39 dogs were categorized according to the affected organs for the convenience of
statistical analysis (Table 3). All malignant tumors were classified as cancer, regardless of origin.
Table 3.
Concurrent diseases in the dogs with chronic kidney disease
(CKD)
Blood analysis (complete blood cell count and serum biochemistry)
All dogs underwent physical examination, a complete blood count (CBC), and plasma
biochemical profiles were evaluated. Venous blood was collected in a heparinized syringe
for immediate blood gas analysis and the remaining blood samples were stored in an EDTA or
lithium-heparin tube. EDTA whole blood was evaluatedand biochemical profiles were
measured. The CBC and biochemical profiles of the healthy control dogs were within the
normal reference range.
Analysis of CREA, SDMA, and CysC concentrations
To determine CREA levels, 4 ml of blood was collected from the jugular
vein into a lithium-heparin tube. Plasma was immediately separated by centrifugation at
4,000 × g for 5 min at room temperature and CREA concentrations were
measured with Procyte Dx Hematology Analyzer (IDEXX Laboratories, Inc., Westbrook, ME,
USA). To measure SDMA and CysC levels, whole blood was taken from either the jugular vein
directly into sterile vacutainer tubes (Franklin Lakes, Bergen, NJ, USA). The collected
tubes were placed in the upright position in the rack and the blood samples were allowed
to be clotted at room temperature for 20 min. By following centrifugation in 1,500 ×
g for 10 min at 4°C, the supernatants were stored at −80°C or dry ice
until the tests. SDMA concentrations were measured using the Chemistry analyzer AU480
method (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Brea, CA, USA) and CysC was recalibrated to the
standardized. CysC measurement was used by the Roche enzymatic method (Hoffmann-La Roche,
Ltd., Basel, Switzerland). This assay method was the Particle-Enhanced Turbidimetric
Immune-Assay (PETIA) [6].
Statistical analysis
All values are expressed as the mean and standard deviation (SD). Statistical analyses
were conducted twice with three different software programs: SPSS for Windows 12.0K (SPSS
Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), GraphPad Prism version 5.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla,
CA, USA), and MedCalc Statistical Software version 16.4.3 (MedCalc Software bvba, Ostend,
Belgium). A probability value less than 0.05 (P<0.05) was considered
statistically significant. The data represent the results of Kruskal Wallis and Dunn’s
multiple comparisons tests. The relationships between the kidney markers (CREA, SDMA, and
CysC levels) were measured using Pearson’s coefficient of bivariate correlation and
Bland-Altman plots. The optimal cut-off points for the biomarkers were determined using
receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, selecting for the highest sensitivity or
percentage of correct classification at a specificity >90%. Sensitivity, specificity,
likelihood ratios, and area under the curves (AUC) were also calculated.
RESULTS
Patient population
Of the dogs with CKD, 46.2% were IRIS stage I, 17.9% were IRIS stage II, 33.3% were IRIS
stage III, and 2.6% were IRIS stage IV (Table
4). The control dogs had no evidence of CKD.
Table 4.
Population of the study and International Renal Interest Society (IRIS) stages
in chronic kidney disease (CKD)
Group
n
%
Healthy control
10
20.4
CKD
39
79.6
IRIS stage
I
18
46.2
II
7
17.9
III
13
33.3
IV
1
2.6
Characteristics of animal participants
Body weight, blood pressure, heart rate, body temperature, and body condition score (BCS)
of the healthy and IRIS stage dogs are presented in Table 2. Compared to that in the healthy controls, blood pressure was higher in
IRIS stage I, III, IV dogs. BCS was significantly higher in all IRIS stage dogs than in
the healthy controls. Body weight and heart rate had no relation.
CBC and serum-chemistry findings in healthy and IRIS stage dogs
The CBC values of the healthy controls were within the normal reference range in Table 5. Hematocrit was significantly lower in IRIS stage III compared to that in
the healthy controls and IRIS stage I. Platelet was increased in IRIS stage I and IRIS
stage II compared to that in the healthy controls. No change was observed in WBC in either
group of dogs studied.
Table 5.
The complete cell count values in the study
Variable (unit)
Healthy control(n=10)
International Renal Interest Society stage
I(n=18)
II(n=7)
III(n=13)
IV(n=1)
HCT (%)
44.8 ± 4.77
41.9 ± 7.40
38.3 ± 8.78
34.9 ± 10.8a,b)
32.0 ± 0.00
WBC (K/µl)
11.3 ± 1.78
10.9 ± 4.58
9.6 ± 4.24
12.9 ± 8.43
20.4 ± 0.00
PLT (K/µl)
310 ± 59.7
472 ± 181
424 ± 114a)
351 ± 212
806 ± 0.00
a) P<0.05 healthy controls vs IRIS groups by
t-test. b) P<0.05 IRIS stage I vs IRIS stages
II, III, and IV by t-test. HCT, hematocrit; WBC, white blood cell;
PLT, platelet.
a) P<0.05 healthy controls vs IRIS groups by
t-test. b) P<0.05 IRIS stage I vs IRIS stages
II, III, and IV by t-test. HCT, hematocrit; WBC, white blood cell;
PLT, platelet.The serum biochemistry analysis and urinalysis results are shown in Table 6. The BUN, CREA, calcium, and phosphorus values of the healthy controls were
normal. BUN was significantly increased in IRIS stage III compared to that in the healthy
controls and IRIS stage I. CREA was also significantly increased in IRIS stage II and III
compared to that in the healthy controls and IRIS stage I. As CREA is used in IRIS
classification, its increase is stage-dependent. No change was observed in calcium in
either group of dogs studied. On the other hand, phosphorus was significantly increased in
IRIS stage III compared with that of the IRIS stage I. USG was significantly decreased in
IRIS stage III and IV compared to that in the healthy control and IRIS stage I and II. No
statistical significance was observed in urinalysis.
Table 6.
The serum biochemistry analysis and urinalysis in the study
Variable (unit)
Healthy control(n=10)
International Renal Interest Society stage
I(n=18)
II(n=7)
III(n=13)
IV(n=1)
BUN (mg/dl)
16.9 ± 2.08
17.1 ± 11.3
19.0 ± 8.11
62.2 ± 40.2a,b)
111 ± 0.00
CREA (mg/dl)
0.82 ± 0.12
0.74 ± 0.28
1.53 ± 0.18a,b)
2.43 ± 8.02
4.50 ± 0.00
Ca (mg/dl)
9.48 ± 0.18
9.04 ± 1.04
9.09 ± 0.87
9.62 ± 1.32
9.80 ± 0.00
PHOS (mg/dl)
4.39 ± 1.27
4.09 ± 0.77a)
4.16 ± 1.03
5.58 ± 2.86
16.1 ± 0.00
USG
1.031 ± 0.011
1.022 ± 0.013
1.020 ± 1.012
1.011 ± 0.004
1.000 ± 0.000
a) P<0.05 healthy controls vs. IRIS groups by
t-test. b) P<0.05 IRIS stage I vs. IRIS
stages II, III, and IV by t-test.BUN, blood urea nitrogen; CREA,
creatinine; Ca, total calcium; PHOS, phosphorus; USG, urine specific gravity.
a) P<0.05 healthy controls vs. IRIS groups by
t-test. b) P<0.05 IRIS stage I vs. IRIS
stages II, III, and IV by t-test.BUN, blood ureanitrogen; CREA,
creatinine; Ca, total calcium; PHOS, phosphorus; USG, urine specific gravity.
Levels of CREA, SDMA, and CysC in dogs with CKD
CREA and SDMA and CysC levels were significantly elevated in CKDpatients than in healthy
controls (Fig. 1). For CREA, the mean concentration was 0.82 ± 0.38
µg/dl in healthy controls and 1.52 ± 0.16
µg/dl in CKDpatients (Fig. 1A). For SDMA, the mean concentration was 11.3 ± 0.53
µg/dl in healthy controls and 21.3 ± 2.02
µg/dl in CKDpatients (Fig. 1B). The mean concentration of CysC was 0.69 ± 0.02
mg/l in healthy controls and 1.66 ± 0.24 mg/l in CKDpatients (Fig. 1C).
Fig. 1.
Boxplot of biomarker levels in healthy dogs (n=10) and dogs with
chronic kidney disease (CKD) (International Renal Interest Society (IRIS) stages I,
II, III, and IV; n=39). *P<0.05 vs. the healthy
controls.
Boxplot of biomarker levels in healthy dogs (n=10) and dogs with
chronic kidney disease (CKD) (International Renal Interest Society (IRIS) stages I,
II, III, and IV; n=39). *P<0.05 vs. the healthy
controls.
Correlation of CREA, SDMA, and CysC levels in dogs with CKD
CREA and SDMA and CysC concentrations were plotted for patients with CKD using a scatter
plot (Fig. 2). CREA concentration strongly correlated with SDMA (Fig. 2A). The serum levels of CysC were also strongly correlated
with CREA (Fig.
2B) as well as SDMA (Fig.
1C) levels. As the dogs with CKD became more azotemic, CREA and SDMA and CysC
data points shifted to the upper right quadrant. Bland-Altman plots revealed the data of
CREA and CysC levels with minimal bias (Fig.
2B-1) for the majority of measured variables which demonstrated a
strong agreement among the protocols.
Fig. 2.
Correlations of plasma creatinine (CREA) and serum symmetric dimethylarginine
(SDMA) levels (A), serum cystatin C (CysC) and plasma CREA levels (B), and serum
CysC and serum SDMA levels (C) in dogs with chronic kidney disease (CKD)
(International Renal Interest Society (IRIS) stages I, II, III, and IV;
n=39). The solid line indicates the power trendline of the data.
The dotted central horizontal full lines (A-1, B-1, C-1) represent the mean of the
differences (=bias) between the two methods. The two dotted horizontal lines
represent the upper and lower 95% limits of agreement (=bias ± 1.96×SD).
Correlations of plasma creatinine (CREA) and serum symmetric dimethylarginine
(SDMA) levels (A), serum cystatin C (CysC) and plasma CREA levels (B), and serum
CysC and serum SDMA levels (C) in dogs with chronic kidney disease (CKD)
(International Renal Interest Society (IRIS) stages I, II, III, and IV;
n=39). The solid line indicates the power trendline of the data.
The dotted central horizontal full lines (A-1, B-1, C-1) represent the mean of the
differences (=bias) between the two methods. The two dotted horizontal lines
represent the upper and lower 95% limits of agreement (=bias ± 1.96×SD).
Comparison of CREA, SDMA, and CysC levels among dogs according to IRIS stage of
CKD
The results of all three markers for each IRIS stage are presented in Fig. 3. The mean CREA concentrations were 0.82 ± 0.03
µg/dl in the healthy controls, 0.73 ± 0.06
µg/dl in IRIS stage I, 1.52 ± 0.06
µg/dl in IRIS stage II, 2.38 ± 0.24
µg/dl in IRIS stage III, and 4.50 ± 0.00
µg/dl in IRIS stage IV (Fig. 3A). The mean SDMA concentrations were 11.3 ± 0.53
µg/dl in the healthy controls, 13.9 ± 1.11
µg/dl in IRIS stage I, 17.5 ± 2.13
µg/dl in IRIS stage II, 29.3 ± 1.72
µg/dl in IRIS stage III, and 77.0 ± 0.00
µg/dl in IRIS stage IV (Fig. 3B). The mean CysC concentrations were 0.69 ± 0.02
mg/l in the healthy controls, 1.09 ± 0.12 mg/l in IRIS
stage I, 1.25 ± 0.17 mg/l in IRIS stage II, 2.14 ± 0.35
mg/l in IRIS stage III, and 8.71 ± 0.00 mg/l in IRIS
stage IV (Fig. 3C). CREA and SDMA concentrations
were significantly higher in IRIS stages II and III than in the healthy controls, whereas
the CREA and SDMA concentrations were not significant between the healthy controls and
IRIS stage I (Fig. 3A and 3B). However, the mean
CysC concentration was significantly higher in IRIS stages I, II, and III than in the
healthy controls (Fig. 3C).
Fig. 3.
Concentrations of plasma creatinine (CREA), serum symmetric dimethylarginine
(SDMA), and serum cystatin C (CysC) in healthy dogs and dogs with chronic kidney
disease (CKD). 0: healthy controls (n=10), 1: International Renal
Interest Society (IRIS) stage I (n=18), 2: IRIS stage II
(n=7), and 3: IRIS stage III (n=13).
*P<0.05 healthy controls vs. IRIS stages I, II, and III.
#P<0.05 IRIS stage I vs. IRIS stages II and
III.
Concentrations of plasma creatinine (CREA), serum symmetric dimethylarginine
(SDMA), and serum cystatin C (CysC) in healthy dogs and dogs with chronic kidney
disease (CKD). 0: healthy controls (n=10), 1: International Renal
Interest Society (IRIS) stage I (n=18), 2: IRIS stage II
(n=7), and 3: IRIS stage III (n=13).
*P<0.05 healthy controls vs. IRIS stages I, II, and III.
#P<0.05 IRIS stage I vs. IRIS stages II and
III.
Sensitivity and specificity of CREA, SDMA, and CysC levels in dogs with CKD
The sensitivity and specificity of the biomarkers for detecting CKD in dogs were
evaluated. The area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity results are
shown in Fig. 4. The cut-off level of CREA for detecting CKD in dogs was >1.15
µg/dl (sensitivity 58.3%, specificity 100%). The AUC
for CREA was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.546–0.828, P=0.07; Fig. 4A). The cut-off level of SDMA for detecting CKDdogs was
>13.5 µg/dl (sensitivity 69.2%, specificity 100%).
The AUC for SDMA was 0.806 (95% CI: 0.688–0.924, P=0.003; Fig. 4B). The cut-off level of CysC for detecting
CKDdogs was >0.825 mg/l (sensitivity 76.9%, specificity 100%). The
AUC for CysC was 0.867 (95% CI: 0.769–0.966, P=0.0003; Fig. 4C).
Fig. 4.
Nonparametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plots of the sensitivity and
specificity of plasma creatinine (CREA) (A), serum symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA)
(B), and serum cystatin C (CysC) (C) levels for detecting kidney damage in 39 dogs
with chronic kidney disease (CKD).
Nonparametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plots of the sensitivity and
specificity of plasma creatinine (CREA) (A), serum symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA)
(B), and serum cystatin C (CysC) (C) levels for detecting kidney damage in 39 dogs
with chronic kidney disease (CKD).Therefore, the data collected in this study among the CKDpatients showed that CysC had
the highest sensitivity for CKD, followed by SDMA and CREA.
Comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of CREA, SDMA, and CysC levels between
the healthy controls and dogs in IRIS stage I
The sensitivity and specificity of the CKD biomarkers were compared between the healthy
controls and patients in IRIS stage I (Fig.
5). The cut-off level of CREA for detecting stage I CKDdogs was ≤0.95
µg/dl (sensitivity 22.2%, specificity 90%). The AUC of
CREA was 0.619 (95% CI: 0.409–0.829, P=0.302). The cut-off level of SDMA
for detecting stage I CKDdogs was >13.5 µg/dl
(sensitivity 50.0%, specificity 100%). The AUC of serum SDMA was 0.669 (95% CI:
0.470–0.868, P=0.143). The cut-off level of CysC for detecting stage I
CKDdogs was >0.825 mg/l (sensitivity 66.7%, specificity 100%). The
AUC of CysC was 0.802 (95% CI: 0.636–0.968, P=0.009).
Fig. 5.
Nonparametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plots of the comparison of
the sensitivity and specificity of plasma creatinine (CREA), serum symmetric
dimethylarginine (SDMA), and serum cystatin C (CysC) levels for detecting kidney
damage between healthy and International Renal Interest Society (IRIS) stage I dogs
(n=18).
Nonparametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plots of the comparison of
the sensitivity and specificity of plasma creatinine (CREA), serum symmetric
dimethylarginine (SDMA), and serum cystatin C (CysC) levels for detecting kidney
damage between healthy and International Renal Interest Society (IRIS) stage I dogs
(n=18).The results suggested that CysC show the best sensitivity followed by SDMA and, CREA in
comparison between healthy controls and IRIS stage I CKD group.
DISCUSSION
The following were the main results of this study: 1. CysC level was significantly higher
in dogs with CKD than in healthy controls; 2. CysC concentration strongly correlated with
CREA and SDMA concentrations; 3. CysC was the most effective biomarker for detecting early
stage CKD (IRIS stage I); and 4. CysC was a more sensitive marker of early or late stage CKD
than CREA or SDMA. The clinical significance of this study can be summarized as follows.
First, CysC significantly correlated with IRIS stage I and stage II, whereas CREA and SDMA
did not. Second, in this study, CysC showed higher sensitivity than the conventional
indicators CREA and SDMA in CKDpatients.CREA, SDMA and CysC levels were significantly higher in dogs with CKD than in the healthy
controls in this study. Similarly, a study on humans reported a comparison of eGFR equations
of CREA, SDMA, and CysC and their application as markers of kidney function [17]. Several veterinary studies also reported that the
levels of kidney biomarkers CREA, SDMA, and CysC were higher in dogs with CKD than in
healthy dogs [2, 9, 11], however, the results were not the
same as those reported by Pelander et al. for CysC [16]. It has reported that CysC is not a superior biomarkers than others,
whereas the present study has showed that CysC is a beneficial biomarker for detecting IRIS
stage I compared to CREA or SDMA. The sensitivity and specificity of CysC were higher than
other factors. Additional research still is needed to validate the role of CysC in canineCKD.We investigated the relationship between CREA and SDMA concentrations in dogs with CKD
throughout IRIS stages. We found a significant positive correlation between SDMA and CREA
levels which has been reported previously in dogs with CKD in literature [9]. CysC level was correlated highly with CREA and SDMA
levels by Pearson’s correlation coefficient in the present study. The correlation between
CysC and CREA levels was highly plotted in the Bland-Altman method. It showed that the
correlations among multiple markers of kidney function in dogs with CKD. Steubl et
al. [17] also stated that markers such as
CREA and CysC exhibit a hyperbolic correlation to eGFR in humanpatients with CKD.A recent study investigated the use of serum CREA, SDMA, and CysC levels to detect reduced
GFR in clinically stable dog. Adjusting the cutoff for CysC to correspond to diagnose, the
sensitivity is 90% (0.49 mg/dl) and the specificity 72%, which were lower
than both of CREA and SDMA [16]. Whereas showed that
CysC was higher sensitivity and specificity compared to other factors. CREA and SDMA are
insufficient for detecting IRIS stage I in the previous study [16] and also the present study, while serum levels of the biomarker CysC
are showed increased in IRIS stage I in the present study. To the best of our knowledge, the
present study was assessed that CysC levels in dogs with CKD to determine its efficacy for
detecting early stage CKD compared to that of CREA and SDMA.The results of the present study indicate that CysC is a beneficial biomarker for detecting
IRIS stage I compared to CREA or SDMA. Earlier detection will allow the initiation of
reno-protective interventions to slow the progression of kidney disease sooner, ultimately
extending the life expectancy of dogs with CKD.The present study has some limitations. The number of population was not enough to evaluate
the performance of these biomarkers. Further, GFR was not directly measured, three
biomarkers, CREA, SDMA, and CysC, were used to estimate GFR, and we were not able to assess
GFR for our caninepatients with CKD. Further studies are needed.
Authors: M B Nabity; G E Lees; M M Boggess; M Yerramilli; E Obare; M Yerramilli; A Rakitin; J Aguiar; R Relford Journal: J Vet Intern Med Date: 2015-06-16 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Dominik Steubl; Matthias Block; Victor Herbst; Wolfgang Andreas Nockher; Wolfgang Schlumberger; Robin Satanovskij; Susanne Angermann; Anna-Lena Hasenau; Lynne Stecher; Uwe Heemann; Lutz Renders; Jürgen Scherberich Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 1.889
Authors: Lena Pelander; Jens Häggström; Anders Larsson; Harriet Syme; Jonathan Elliott; Reidun Heiene; Ingrid Ljungvall Journal: J Vet Intern Med Date: 2019-02-21 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Fabiola de Oliveira Paes-Leme; Eliana Matias de Souza; Mariah Gois Ceregatti; Marco Túlio Gomes Campos; Patricia Donado Vaz de Melo; Adriane Pimenta da Costa-Val Journal: Vet World Date: 2022-06-30