Literature DB >> 3258108

Epidural fibrosis and recurrent disk herniation in the lumbar spine: MR imaging assessment.

C V Bundschuh1, M T Modic, J S Ross, T J Masaryk, H Bohlman.   

Abstract

Twenty patients were enrolled in a prospective study to evaluate MR imaging in the differentiation of epidural scar and herniated disk material. Fourteen patients had surgical verification of imaging findings. In 12 (86%) of these patients, the MR interpretations fully agreed with the observations at surgery. Careful integration of the findings on sagittal and axial T1-weighted images with more T2-weighted axial images was important for analysis. Anterior and lateral recess scars were hypo- or isointense on T1-weighted sequences and hyperintense on more T2-weighted sequences relative to the "parent" anulus intensity. Free fragments demonstrated a slightly hyperintense signal intensity on T1-weighted images relative to epidural fibrosis but had a similar hyperintense signal intensity on T2-weighted sequences. Prolapsed or extruded disk fragments were hypo- or isointense relative to the parent anulus on all sequences. Morphology, epidural location, mass effect, and often signal intensity were the important parameters by which scar and herniated disk could be differentiated with MR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3258108     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.150.4.923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  15 in total

1.  Ionic versus nonionic paramagnetic contrast media in differentiating between postoperative scar and recurrent disk.

Authors:  Jui-Sheng Hsu; Gin-Chung Liu; Shih-Hsien Chen; Twei-Shiun Jaw; Wun-Jer Shen; Chiao-Yun Chen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  [MRT diagnosis for degenerative changes in the spine].

Authors:  T Kahn; U Quäschling; V Engelbrecht
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  [Postoperative syndrome after spine surgery].

Authors:  F Ahlhelm; W Reith; N Naumann; G Schulte-Altedorneburg; P Papanagiotou; J Kelm; A Nabhan
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  MRI after successful lumbar discectomy.

Authors:  J W Van Goethem; E Van de Kelft; I G Biltjes; B A van Hasselt; L van den Hauwe; P M Parizel; A M De Schepper
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 5.  Clinical efficacy of imaging modalities in the diagnosis of low-back pain disorders.

Authors:  N Boos; P H Lander
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  [Postoperative findings in the spinal column].

Authors:  J M Lieb; S Ulmer; J Kelm; K Shariat; C Stippich; F J Ahlhelm
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Contrast enhanced computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of recurrent disc herniation.

Authors:  M J Albeck; A Wagner; L L Knudsen
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 8.  Imaging of post-operative spine in intervertebral disc pathology.

Authors:  A Splendiani; F D'Orazio; L Patriarca; F Arrigoni; F Caranci; P Fonio; L Brunese; A Barile; E Di Cesare; C Masciocchi
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-02-06

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and myelography in the diagnosis of recurrent lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  M J Albeck; L Kjaer; J Praestholm; A Vestergaard; O Henriksen; F Gjerris
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  [Imaging of extradural spinal lesions].

Authors:  F Ahlhelm; G Schulte-Altedorneburg; N Naumann; A Nabhan; W Reith
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.