Literature DB >> 32581051

Regular versus extended shift outbreak roster in the emergency department and its impact on staff well-being.

Sohil Pothiawala1, Hong Khai Lau2, Annitha Annathurai2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  efficiency; emergency department operations; infectious diseases

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32581051      PMCID: PMC7418606          DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2020-210247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


× No keyword cloud information.
An outbreak response roster during pandemic plays a crucial role, with a recent article1 suggesting a 12-hour extended shift model, aiming to limit interactions between healthcare workers. In Singapore, a typical ED shift is around 8–9 hours. Although there are perceived benefits of working 12-hour shifts like reduction in total number of shifts and compressed working week, it can lead to staff experiencing fatigue, psychological distress, performance reduction and increased risk of errors in a busy, fast-paced ED environment.2 Also, there is a potential risk of cross-exposure as team doctors rotate between managing high-risk and low-risk areas. Handling a pandemic like COVID-19 can be a marathon, requiring sustainability for a prolonged time period. Roster planning can impact the physical and psychological well-being of healthcare staff. Hence, it was imperative that we develop a roster to prevent cross-exposure among doctors, avoid working long hours and reduce the psychological impact of working longer shifts. Thus, our ED continued to roster staff on usual 8-hour shifts and regular off days, similar to the non-outbreak period. Regular shift durations were more beneficial to the healthcare staff to mitigate fatigue and its associated risks, compared with working longer shifts3 and follow the best practice of safe working hours. To reduce cross-infection, ED doctors were split into two teams: one team managing the confirmed or suspected COVID-19 patients, while the other managing the non-COVID patients. Considering the fluidity of the pandemic and changing dynamics of patient surge, this roster allows cross-cover from the low-risk to high-risk teams. We rostered standby doctors for both teams, for rapid activation in case of surge or if any staff member was sick, without the risk of interaction between members of different teams. The type of model to adopt, regular versus extended shift hours, depends on individual ED requirements, based on ED design, pandemic workflows, patient workload and manpower. As the pandemic evolves, we must continually monitor and tweak rostering rules, such that the roster pattern is adapted to best serve our patients and minimise risks of fatigue and burnout of healthcare staff over a prolonged period of time.
  3 in total

Review 1.  Assessing the relationships between nurse work hours/overtime and nurse and patient outcomes: systematic literature review.

Authors:  Sung-Heui Bae; Donna Fabry
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 3.250

2.  Shorter Versus Longer Shift Durations to Mitigate Fatigue and Fatigue-Related Risks in Emergency Medical Services Personnel and Related Shift Workers: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  P Daniel Patterson; Michael S Runyon; J Stephen Higgins; Matthew D Weaver; Ellen M Teasley; Andrew J Kroemer; Margaret E Matthews; Brett R Curtis; Katharyn L Flickinger; Xiaoshuang Xun; Zhadyra Bizhanova; Patricia M Weiss; Joseph P Condle; Megan L Renn; Denisse J Sequeira; Patrick J Coppler; Eddy S Lang; Christian Martin-Gill
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.077

3.  Emergency department 'outbreak rostering' to meet challenges of COVID-19.

Authors:  Wei Lin Tallie Chua; Li Juan Joy Quah; Yuzeng Shen; Nur Diana Zakaria; Paul Weng Wan; Kenneth Tan; Evelyn Wong
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.740

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.