Luke J Pasick1, Jane Y Tong2, Daniel A Benito3, Punam Thakkar3, Joseph F Goodman3, Arjun S Joshi3. 1. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, United States of America. Electronic address: luke.pasick@jhsmiami.org. 2. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Drexel University College of Medicine, United States of America. 3. Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences, United States of America.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate surgical approaches and outcomes associated with accessory parotid gland neoplasms. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. REVIEW METHODS: A systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) was performed. Studies were included if they reported surgical management and outcomes of patients with accessory parotid gland neoplasms. RESULTS: After screening 3532 records, 15 studies were included with a total of 187 patients. Benign tumors consisted of 61.5% of cases. External open, transoral, and preauricular endoscopic approaches were used for 82.3%, 11.3%, and 6.5% of cases, respectively. Accessory lobe resection alone, concurrent with partial parotidectomy, and concurrent with total parotidectomy were used in 54.8%, 43.0%, and 2.2% of cases, respectively. Complication rates were similar between histology groups (7.8% benign vs. 8.3% malignant, p = 0.82). Accessory lobe resection with concurrent partial parotidectomy had the lowest overall complication rate (6.3%). Resections limited to the accessory lobe were found to have an overall complication rate of 8.7%. CONCLUSION: The results offer an overview of the surgical management and complications for accessory parotid gland tumors. Overall surgical complication rates found in these case series may be lower for management of accessory gland tumors than rates available in the literature for tumors within the main parotid gland.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate surgical approaches and outcomes associated with accessory parotid gland neoplasms. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. REVIEW METHODS: A systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) was performed. Studies were included if they reported surgical management and outcomes of patients with accessory parotid gland neoplasms. RESULTS: After screening 3532 records, 15 studies were included with a total of 187 patients. Benign tumors consisted of 61.5% of cases. External open, transoral, and preauricular endoscopic approaches were used for 82.3%, 11.3%, and 6.5% of cases, respectively. Accessory lobe resection alone, concurrent with partial parotidectomy, and concurrent with total parotidectomy were used in 54.8%, 43.0%, and 2.2% of cases, respectively. Complication rates were similar between histology groups (7.8% benign vs. 8.3% malignant, p = 0.82). Accessory lobe resection with concurrent partial parotidectomy had the lowest overall complication rate (6.3%). Resections limited to the accessory lobe were found to have an overall complication rate of 8.7%. CONCLUSION: The results offer an overview of the surgical management and complications for accessory parotid gland tumors. Overall surgical complication rates found in these case series may be lower for management of accessory gland tumors than rates available in the literature for tumors within the main parotid gland.