Literature DB >> 32579404

Workflow Mapping-A Q-Probes Study of Preanalytic Testing Processes: A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes Study of 35 Clinical Laboratories.

Peter Perrotta1, David A Novis2, Suzanne Nelson3, Barbara Blond3, Anna Stankovic4, Michael Talbert5.   

Abstract

CONTEXT.—: Workflow mapping is a tool used to characterize operational processes throughout most industries and to identify non-value-added activities. OBJECTIVE.—: To develop a set of workflow mapping tools to compare the sequence and timing of activities, including waiting steps, used by clinical laboratories to process specimens during the preanalytic testing phase. DESIGN.—: Laboratories enrolled in this College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study created workflow maps detailing the steps they used to process specimens from the time of sample arrival in the laboratory to the time of sample delivery to chemistry analyzers. Enrollees recorded the sequence and types of steps involved in specimen processing and the time needed to complete each step. RESULTS.—: Institution average total specimen processing times (SPTs) and the number of steps required to prepare samples varied widely among institutions. Waiting steps, that is, steps requiring specimens to wait before advancing to the next process step, and specimen centrifugation consumed the greatest amount of processing times for both routine and STAT testing. Routine and STAT testing SPTs were shorter at institutions that used rapid centrifuges to prepare samples. Specimen processes requiring more sample waiting steps and computer entry steps had longer aggregate total process times than those with fewer such steps. CONCLUSIONS.—: Aggregate specimen processing times may be shortened by reducing the number of steps involving sample waiting and computer entry activities. Rapid centrifugation is likely to reduce overall average institutional SPTs.
© 2020 College of American Pathologists.

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32579404      PMCID: PMC7720245          DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0043-CP

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  9 in total

1.  The College of American Pathologists, 1946-1996. Quality Assurance Service.

Authors:  N S Lawson; P J Howanitz
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.534

2.  Total Automation for the Core Laboratory: Improving the Turnaround Time Helps to Reduce the Volume of Ordered STAT Tests.

Authors:  Cristiano Ialongo; Ottavia Porzio; Ilio Giambini; Sergio Bernardini
Journal:  J Lab Autom       Date:  2015-04-16

3.  Process Improvements to Reduce Cardiac Troponin Turnaround Time in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Tracy Ison; Linda Morris; Gloria Wilkerson; Carla Schmidt; David E Winchester
Journal:  Crit Pathw Cardiol       Date:  2016-09

4.  Key Performance Indicators to Measure Improvement After Implementation of Total Laboratory Automation Abbott Accelerator a3600.

Authors:  Marijana Miler; Nora Nikolac Gabaj; Lora Dukic; Ana-Maria Simundic
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  Applying Lean methodologies reduces ED laboratory turnaround times.

Authors:  Benjamin A White; Jason M Baron; Anand S Dighe; Carlos A Camargo; David F M Brown
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 2.469

6.  Evaluation of the impact of a total automation system in a large core laboratory on turnaround time.

Authors:  Amy H Lou; Manal O Elnenaei; Irene Sadek; Shauna Thompson; Bryan D Crocker; Bassam Nassar
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2016-09-04       Impact factor: 3.281

7.  Decreasing troponin turnaround time in the emergency department using the central laboratory: A process improvement study.

Authors:  Arlene M Boelstler; Ralph Rowland; Jennifer Theoret; Robert B Takla; Susan Szpunar; Shraddha P Patel; Andrew M Lowry; Margarita E Pena
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 3.281

8.  Twenty-five years of accomplishments of the College of American Pathologists Q-probes program for clinical pathology.

Authors:  Peter J Howanitz; Peter L Perrotta; Christine P Bashleben; Frederick A Meier; Glenn E Ramsey; Larry W Massie; Roberta L Zimmerman; Donald S Karcher
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 9.  Bar Coding and Tracking in Pathology.

Authors:  Matthew G Hanna; Liron Pantanowitz
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.935

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.