| Literature DB >> 32578824 |
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsies are recommended for the detection of suspicious thyroid nodules. However, the best approach regarding suspicious ultrasound features for thyroid nodules is still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of location and size of thyroid nodules on the diagnostic performance of strain ultrasound elastography. In addition, this study evaluated whether ultrasound elastography predicts malignancy in thyroid nodules.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32578824 PMCID: PMC7297523 DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2020/e1720
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) ISSN: 1807-5932 Impact factor: 2.365
Figure 1Flow diagram of the collection of data for the analysis.
Demographical parameters and clinical conditions of the enrolled patients.
| Parameters | Value | |
|---|---|---|
| Patients | 234 | |
| Age (years) | Minimum | 28 |
| Maximum | 69 | |
| Mean±SD | 49.52±6.71 | |
| Gender | Male | 37 (16) |
| Female | 197 (84) | |
| Family history of thyroid nodule | 17 (7) | |
| Nodule per patient, average (range) | 1.16 (1-4) | |
Categorical variables are shown as a frequency (percentage), and continuous variables are shown as a mean±SD.
Figure 2Grayscale ultrasound image of the right thyroid lobe of a 35-year-old female patient. The white circle and white arrow indicate a suspicious thyroid nodule. The maximum diameter of the nodule in the transverse view was 4.8 mm.
Figure 3Grayscale ultrasound image of the right thyroid lobe of a 36-year-old female patient. The nodule was 3 mmin size. The white circle and white arrow indicate a suspicious thyroid nodule. The saffron circle and saffron arrow indicate the carotid artery. AB: the depth of the nodule and AC: the distance of the nodule from the carotid artery.
Figure 4Strain ultrasound elastography of the thyroid gland. ASTERIA scoring criteria. A. Suspicious nodule located within 15 mm from the carotid artery (m=115). B. Suspicious nodule located more than 15 mm from the carotid artery (n=56).
Grayscale ultrasound and strain ultrasound elastography parameters of the nodules.
| Parameters | All nodules | Benign nodules | Suspicious nodule | Comparison between the benign and suspicious nodules | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| p-value | q-value | |||||
| Nodules screened | 272 | 101 | 171 | |||
| Size (mm) | Minimum | 3.32 | 7.58 | 3.32 | <0.0001 | 23.84 |
| Maximum | 19.58 | 19.58 | 6.55 | |||
| Mean±SD | 3.91±1.12 | 5.55±1.23 | 3.28±0.88 | |||
| Depth of the nodule (mm) | Minimum | 4.12 | 4.12 | 5.01 | 0.092 | N/A |
| Maximum | 25.12 | 25.12 | 24.18 | |||
| Mean±SD | 9.27±1.28 | 09.15±1.68 | 9.48±1.01 | |||
| Distance of the nodules from the carotid artery (mm) | Minimum | 6.12 | 8.15 | 6.12 | 0.061 | N/A |
| Maximum | 28.22 | 28.22 | 25.45 | |||
| Mean±SD | 12.13±1.35 | 12.45±1.11 | 11.99±2.01 | |||
| Elasticity contrast index | Minimum | 1.55 | 1.55 | 3.01 | <0.0001 | 21.05 |
| Maximum | 8.11 | 3.55 | 8.11 | |||
| Mean±SD | 3.61±1.18 | 2.55±0.95 | 4.75±1.29 | |||
Variables are shown as a mean±SD.
A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) following the Tukey test was used for the statistical analysis.
A p-value of <0.05 and q>3.314 were considered significant.
N/A: Not applicable.
The effect of the nodule parameters on the elasticity contrast index.
| Type of nodules | All nodules | Benign nodules | Suspicious nodule | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | Coefficient |
| Coefficient |
| Coefficient |
|
| Nodules screened | 272 | 101 | 171 | |||
| Size (mm) | 0.059 | 0.452 | 0.051 | 0.623 | 0.061 | 0.561 |
| Depth of the nodule (mm) | 0.022 | 0.856 | 0.032 | 0.912 | 0.042 | 0.563 |
| Distance of the nodules from the carotid artery (mm) | 0.311 | 0.012 | 0.123 | 0.062 | 0.412 | 0.009 |
Univariate regression analysis.
A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.
Significant difference.
Association of the nodule parameters on the ultrasound elastography diagnosis.
| Type of nodules | All nodules | Benign nodules | Suspicious nodule | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters | Odds ratio | 95% CI |
| Odds ratio | 95% CI |
| Odds ratio | 95% CI |
| |
| Nodules screened | 272 | 101 | 171 | |||||||
| Size (mm) | 0.923 | 0.822-0.985 | 0.652 | 0.895 | 0.812-0.923 | 0.589 | 0.623 | 0.544-0.824 | 0.625 | |
| Depth of the nodule (mm) | 0.852 | 0.765-0.912 | 0.758 | 0.877 | 0.856-0.945 | 0.422 | 0.721 | 0.652-0.655 | 0.725 | |
| Distance of the nodules from the carotid artery (mm) | <15 | 1.811 | 1.556-2.125 | 0.038 | 1.024 | 0.986-1.082 | 0.065 | 2.111 | 1.851-2.35 | 0.006 |
| ≥15 | 1.012 | 0.985-1.234 | 0.096 | 1.023 | 0.985-1.112 | 0.121 | 1.152 | 0.101-1.345 | 0.071 | |
Multivariate regression analysis.
Cl: Confidence interval.
Odds ratio >1 and a p-value<0.05 were considered significant.
Significant difference.
Figure 5Comparative evaluation of the elasticity contrast index of suspicious nodules in relation to the distance from the carotid artery. Data are presented as a mean±SD. *Significantly lower.