Literature DB >> 32578380

The implications of increased mammographic breast density for breast screening in Jordan.

Dana S Al-Mousa1, Maram Alakhras1, Kelly M Spuur2, Haytham Alewaidat1, Mostafa Abdelrahman1, Mohammad Rawashdeh1, Patrick C Brennan3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Mammographic breast density is associated with a four to six times increased risk for breast cancer. Mammographic breast density varies by ethnicity, geographical region and age. The aim of this study was to document for the first time the mammographic breast density of Jordanian women and to explore its relationship with age.
METHODS: Mammograms completed at King Abdullah University Hospital (Irbid, Jordan) between January 2016 and August 2018 were retrospectively reviewed and classified for breast density using the American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). Descriptive analyses and Kurskal-Wallis test were used to examine the association between age and mammographic breast density.
RESULTS: A total of 659 mammograms were reviewed. A significant inverse relationship was observed between age and breast density (P < 0.001). In women aged 40-49 years, 83.2% had dense breasts (ACR BI-RADS (c) and (d)). This percentage decreased to 59.8% of women aged 50-59 years; 38.4% of women in their 60s and 37.9% of women aged 70 years or older (ACR BI-RADS (c) only).
CONCLUSION: The mammographic breast density of Jordanian women has been shown to be high across all age groups. Increased mammographic breast density is associated with increased breast cancer risk and renders mammography a less effective technique for the early detection of breast cancer. Breast cancer screening of Jordanian women should be individualised to develop screening protocols and include additional adjunct imaging to best manage women at high risk.
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; breast density; mammography; population health

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32578380      PMCID: PMC7753846          DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci        ISSN: 2051-3895


  27 in total

Review 1.  Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Lisa J Martin; Michael Bronskill; Martin J Yaffe; Neb Duric; Salomon Minkin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Hormone therapy, mammographic density, and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Lisa J Martin; Salomon Minkin; Norman F Boyd
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Breast density in screening mammography in Indian population - Is it different from western population?

Authors:  Tulika Singh; Niranjan Khandelwal; Veenu Singla; Dileep Kumar; Madhu Gupta; Gurpreet Singh; Amanjit Bal
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 2.431

4.  Breast Cancer Screening Using Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography in Dense and Nondense Breasts.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Rafferty; Melissa A Durand; Emily F Conant; Debra Somers Copit; Sarah M Friedewald; Donna M Plecha; Dave P Miller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Digital mammography screening in Germany: Impact of age and histological subtype on program sensitivity.

Authors:  Oliver Heidinger; Jan Heidrich; Wolf Ulrich Batzler; Volker Krieg; Stefanie Weigel; Walter Heindel; Hans-Werner Hense
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 4.380

6.  Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up.

Authors:  Vittorio Corsetti; Nehmat Houssami; Marco Ghirardi; Aurora Ferrari; Michela Speziani; Sergio Bellarosa; Giuseppe Remida; Cristina Gasparotti; Enzo Galligioni; Stefano Ciatto
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Jeffrey D Blume; Jean B Cormack; Ellen B Mendelson; Daniel Lehrer; Marcela Böhm-Vélez; Etta D Pisano; Roberta A Jong; W Phil Evans; Marilyn J Morton; Mary C Mahoney; Linda Hovanessian Larsen; Richard G Barr; Dione M Farria; Helga S Marques; Karan Boparai
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Mammographic breast density: How it affects performance indicators in screening programmes?

Authors:  Margarita Posso; Javier Louro; Mar Sánchez; Marta Román; Carmen Vidal; María Sala; Marisa Baré; Xavier Castells
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 3.528

9.  Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening: The Reggio Emilia Tomosynthesis Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Pattacini; Andrea Nitrosi; Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Valentina Iotti; Vladimiro Ginocchi; Sara Ravaioli; Rita Vacondio; Luca Braglia; Silvio Cavuto; Cinzia Campari
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.

Authors:  Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 508.702

View more
  1 in total

1.  Construction and validation of a prognostic risk model for breast cancer based on protein expression.

Authors:  Bo Huang; Xujun Zhang; Qingyi Cao; Jianing Chen; Chenhong Lin; Tianxin Xiang; Ping Zeng
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 3.622

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.