| Literature DB >> 32577564 |
Mahmoud O Hassan1, Suzan A Tammam2,3, Hanaa Kamal Galal2, Samir M Saleh4, Mona Sayed1, Ahmed Amro2.
Abstract
Centaurea glomerata Vahl is an annual, monoecious and herbaceous member of Asteraceae, found in some localities of different topographic features/habitat conditions along the Mediterranean coastal region of Egypt. This study aimed to investigate some environmental gradients including edaphic and climate criteria on morphological, reproductive traits as well as phenolic and flavonoid metabolites in this species. Three distinct populations were selected. Two of them were located in coastal sand dunes (found in Rosetta region in Egypt); one was located on flat sand dunes, whereas the other grown on sloping ones. Meanwhile, the third population was represented in the rocky hillside of Burg El Arab region. The population detected in the sloping sand dunes showed best morphological and reproductive features, whilst the opposite was true for that represented on the rocky hillside. Moreover, the free phenolic and flavonoid compounds prevailed in the later. The meteorological data revealed that the rocky hillside received relatively lower minimum temperature and higher solar irradiance, while the sand dunes of Rosetta showed more warmer conditions. Light intensity and wind speed were reduced on the sloping sand dunes. The Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) exhibited a clear correlation between most of metabolites detected and the population found on the rocky hillside along with higher solar irradiance prevails. The morpho-reproductive traits were related to climatic gradients and some soil criteria. These results revealed that the changes in micro-topography, that may lead to change in soil and climate variables, is the most important environmental gradient that controls the morphological and biochemical features of C. glomerata. Solar irradiance and/or light intensity are key factors playing a role influencing the measured traits of this species. These findings suggest that accumulation of secondary metabolites could be a biochemical strategy and an adaptational criterion for such species under stress conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Biochemical strategy; Centaurea glomerata; Environmental analysis; Flavonoids; Morphological traits; Phenols; Reproductive traits; Secondary metabolites; Soil science; Systems biology; Wildlife ecology
Year: 2020 PMID: 32577564 PMCID: PMC7300105 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04173
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Figure 1The map of the study area showing its structure, location and coordinates in Egypt. The sampling sites are represented by numbers: 1 is the plain sand dunes, 2 is the sloping sand dunes in Rosetta and 3 is the rocky hillside in Burg El Arab.
Location coordinates and some abiotic characteristics recorded under field conditions on the microhabitats studied. N = North, E = East, a.s.l. = above sea level.
| Parameter | Rossetta | Burg El Arab | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flat sand dunes | Sloping sand dunes | Rocky hillsides | |
| Latitude (N) | 31° 23′ 04.30″ | 31° 23′ 05.10″ | 30° 54′ 41.60″ |
| Longitude (E) | 30° 25′ 12.90″ | 30° 25′ 12.90″ | 29° 31′ 3.70″ |
| Elevation (m a.s.l.) | 19 | 13 | 30 |
| Density of population (No. m−2) | 8 | 4 | 13 |
| Wind direction | NW | NW | NW |
| Soil depth (cm) | 30–40 | ˂ 90 | ˂ 10 |
| Apparent soil compactness | Less compact | Very loose | Very compact with hard crust |
Mean values ± SE of some morphological and reproductive traits measured in C. glomerata from distinct habitats/microhabitats at the Mediterranean coastal region, Egypt. (RRA = relative reproductive allocation). Different letters for the same parameter indicate significant differences among the different locations using Tukey's test at P ˂ 0.05.
| Parameter | Rosetta | Burg El Arab | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flat sand dunes | Sloping sand dunes | Rocky hillside | |
| Root length (cm) | 17.33b ± 1.6 | 26.17c ± 0.61 | 7.25a ± 0.28 |
| Floral stem length (cm) | 6.17b ± 0.48 | 8.67c ± 0.71 | 1.48a ± 0.12 |
| Root dry matter (g plant−1) | 0.55b ± 0.05 | 1.13c ± 0.03 | 0.16a ± 0.01 |
| Leaf area (cm2 plant−1) | 118.10b ± 23.02 | 228.74c ± 16.00 | 39.10a ± 6.80 |
| Leaf dry matter (g plant−1) | 1.30b ± 0.09 | 4.29c ± 0.18 | 0.30a ± 0.02 |
| Total dry weight (g plant−1) | 4.30b ± 0.30 | 12.12c ± 0.43 | 1.19a ± 0.06 |
| Number of heads plant−1 | 19.00a ± 2.53 | 67.17b ± 6.90 | 13.67a ± 0.92 |
| Number of seeds plant−1 | 321.33b ± 27.49 | 469.17c ± 33.82 | 127.50a ± 3.49 |
| Dry weight of heads plant−1 | 2.15b ± 0.15 | 5.65c ± 0.37 | 0.58a ± 0.04 |
| Seed mass (g plant−1) | 0.46b ± 0.03 | 0.48b ± 0.32 | 0.11a ± 0.01 |
| RRA | 1.41b ± 0.03 | 1.13a ± 0.07 | 1.52b ± 0.10 |
Mean values ± SE of the different phenolic and flavonoid compounds detected in C. glomerata from distinct habitats/microhabitats at the Mediterranean coastal region, Egypt. Different letters for the same compound indicate significant differences among the different locations using Tukey's test at P ˂ 0.05. The individual compounds were expressed as μg g−1 dry weight, and the total compounds were expressed as mg g−1 dry weight plant sample.
| Compound | Rossetta | Burg El Arab | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flat sand dunes | Sloping sand dunes | Rocky hillside | |
| Caffeic acid | 0.72a ± 0.07 | 0.47a ± 0.17 | 1.35b ± 0.09 |
| Chlorogenic acid | 8.88a ± 0.91 | 10.86a ± 0.90 | 22.64b ± 0.91 |
| Ellagic acid | 0.12a ± 0.005 | 0.14a ± 0.014 | 0.28b ± 0.01 |
| Ferulic acid | 1.37a ± 0.39 | 0.95a ± 0.16 | 2.40b ± 0.14 |
| Gallic acid | 1.33a ± 0.07 | 1.70a ± 0.30 | 2.70b ± 0.10 |
| p-Coumaric acid | 0.15a ± 0.01 | 0.59a ± 0.28 | 0.32a ± 0.03 |
| Protocatechuic acid | 1.35b ± 0.20 | 0.56a ± 0.25 | 1.55b ± 0.13 |
| Resorcinol | 0.41a ± 0.01 | 0.40a ± 0.04 | 1.01b ± 0.04 |
| Sinapic acid | 0.80a ± 0.29 | 1.55a ± 0.28 | 3.37b ± 0.12 |
| Syringic acid | 2.17a ± 0.09 | 2.29a ± 0.20 | 4.55b ± 0.16 |
| β-Glucogallin | 0.57a ± 0.03 | 0.47a ± 0.11 | 1.25b ± 0.08 |
| Total phenols | 45.80b ± 4.45 | 14.95a ± 1.72 | 45.18b ± 3.99 |
| Apigenin | 0.37a ± 0.07 | 0.48a ± 0.078 | 1.01b ± 0.04 |
| Catechin | 0.012a ± 0.001 | 0.017a ± 0.003 | 0.02b ± 0.001 |
| Daidzein | 0.03a ± 0.001 | 0.06a ± 0.002 | 0.13b ± 0.005 |
| Fesitin | 0.22a ± 0.01 | 0.36b ± 0.014 | 0.85c ± 0.03 |
| Genistein | 0.21b ± 0.012 | 0.11a ± 0.011 | 0.28c ± 0.01 |
| Isoquercetrin | 0.27a ± 0.06 | 0.49b ± 0.031 | 1.05c ± 0.05 |
| Kaempferol | 22.83b ± 2.40 | 2.49a ± 0.35 | 5.38a ± 0.58 |
| Luteolin | 2.61b ± 0.17 | 0.19a ± 0.014 | 0.49a ± 0.03 |
| Naringenin | 2.34b ± 0.05 | 1.66a ± 0.061 | 4.48c ± 0.18 |
| O-hydroxydaidzein | 0.53a ± 0.06 | 0.62a ± 0.051 | 0.72a ± 0.72 |
| Quercetin | 6.56a ± 0.95 | 5.67a ± 0.54 | 6.87a ± 0.24 |
| Rutin | 0.58a ± 0.14 | 0.48a ± 0.045 | 1.15b ± 0.06 |
| Velutin | 0.63a ± 0.02 | 0.66a ± 0.054 | 1.17b ± 0.04 |
| Total flavonoids | 15.28b ± 1.02 | 5.87a ± 0.35 | 11.49b ± 0.57 |
Mean values ± SE of the edaphic characteristics of the studied C. glomerata habitats at the Mediterranean coastal region, Egypt. Different letters for the same parameter indicate significant differences among the different locations using Tukey's test at P ˂ 0.05.
| Soil character | Rossetta | Burg El Arab | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flat sand dunes | Sloping sand dunes | Rocky hillside | |
| Gravels (%) | 3.68b ± 0.22 | 0.00a ± 0.00 | 15.38c ± 0.51 |
| Sand (%) | 20.96b ± 0.72 | 12.75a ± 0.80 | 26.65c ± 0.44 |
| Silt (%) | 54.38b ± 1.45 | 67.43c ± 0.98 | 29.37a ± 0.52 |
| Clay (%) | 20.41a ± 0.64 | 19.81a ± 0.19 | 28.60b ± 0.31 |
| EC (μS cm−1) | 142.87a ± 2.51 | 140.73a ± 2.18 | 232.67b ± 5.78 |
| pH | 8.25a ± 0.01 | 8.16a ± 0.02 | 8.15a ± 0.03 |
| Organic carbon (%) | 0.60b ± 0.01 | 0.38a ± 0.02 | 0.75c ± 0.00 |
| NO3- (mg g−1 soil) | 5.56a ± 0.10 | 6.34ab ± 0.47 | 7.29b ± 0.57 |
| NH4+ (mg g−1 soil) | 7.37a ± 0.14 | 8.40ab ± 0.62 | 9.67b ± 0.76 |
| P (mg g−1 soil) | 17.02c ± 0.89 | 12.12b ± 0.45 | 9.30a ± 0.01 |
| K (mg g−1 soil) | 0.09b ± 0.001 | 0.08a ± 0.003 | 0.13c ± 0.005 |
| Ca (mg g−1 soil) | 0.43b ± 0.02 | 0.32a ± 0.017 | 0.47b ± 0.04 |
| Mg (mg g−1 soil) | 0.24a ± 0.03 | 0.34ab ± 0.06 | 0.42b ± 0.02 |
| SO42- (mg g−1 soil) | 6.63a ± 0.12 | 3.83a ± 0.62 | 14.33b ± 0.62 |
| Cl (%) | 0.28a ± 0.04 | 0.31a ± 0.05 | 0.25a ± 0.02 |
| Na (mg g−1 soil) | 0.20a ± 0.003 | 0.13a ± 0.01 | 0.25a ± 0.01 |
The average meteorological data recorded at Rosetta and Burg El Arab regions in months of the growing season of C. glomerata. The values inside the parentheses represent the climate data of Rossetta and those outside the parentheses represent those of Burg El Arab. The data represent the means of 3 years of records (2016–2018).
| Climate parameter | Months of the growing season | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct. | Nov. | Dec. | Jan. | Feb. | Mar. | Apr. | May | |
| Rainfall (mm) | 11.94 (23.45) | 23.59 (22.51) | 28.76 (49.24) | 32.75 (25.39) | 9.50 (8.56) | 2.00 (2.70) | 32.70 (19.21) | 0.03 (0.01) |
| Wind speed (km hr−1) | 3.17 (3.56) | 2.83 (3.30) | 3.36 (3.99) | 3.41 (4.03) | 2.80 (3.25) | 3.25 (3.74) | 3.10 (3.56) | 3.45 (3.85) |
| Relative humidity (%) | 62.45 (65.10) | 64.46 (65.02) | 67.97 (68.74) | 68.10 (68.48) | 65.60 (68.19) | 59.85 (63.59) | 55.30 (60.47) | 54.00 (59.37) |
| Maximum temperature (˚C) | 28.57 (27.74) | 23.93 (23.75) | 19.27 (19.41) | 17.50 (17.45) | 20.25 (19.65) | 23.03 (22.00) | 26.91 (25.40) | 29.86 (28.10) |
| Minimum temperature (˚C) | 19.31 (21.10) | 15.63 (17.77) | 12.22 (14.49) | 9.44 (11.75) | 10.18 (12.25) | 11.89 (13.65) | 14.14 (15.85) | 17.75 (19.20) |
| Solar irradiance (MJ.m−2. day−1) | 18.97 (17.20) | 11.56 (9.79) | 10.10 (8.78) | 12.56 (10.50) | 14.10 (12.25) | 20.14 (17.80) | 24.43 (22.30) | 27.24 (25.40) |
Significant differences between both sites at P < 0.05 according to Student's t-test.
Significant differences between both sites at P < 0.01 according to Student's t-test.
The climate criteria measured on the ground (expressed as % from the main climate data) and changed on the sloping sand dunes in comparison with the remaining habitats. The remaining climate parameters are not shown as they have not been changed in the habitats studied. Different letters for the same parameter indicate significant differences among the different locations using Tukey's test at P ˂ 0.05.
| Climate parameter | Rossetta | Burg El Arab | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flat dunes | Sloping dunes | Rocky hillside | |
| Sunlight (%) | 97.87b ± 3.87 | 76.78a ± 6.17 | 98.15b ± 4.09 |
| Wind speed (%) | 98.25b ± 12.01 | 72.25a ± 9.45 | 99.5b ± 10.11 |
Figure 2Triplot of CCA showing the possible correlations between soil variables and Centaurea glomerata traits. AP = Apigenin, BG = β-glucogalin, CA = Caffeic acid, Cat = Catechin, CH = Chlorogenic acid, D = Daidzain, DW = Total dry weight, DWH = Dry weight of heads, EA = Ellagic acid, FA = Ferulic acid, Fe = Fesitin, FSL = Floral stem length, GA = Galic acid, Ge = Genistein, IS = Isoquercetin, LA = Leaf area, LDM = Leaf dry matter, Nar = Naringenin, NH = Number of heads, NH4 = soil ammonia, NO3 = soil nitrates, OC = Organic carbon, OH = O-hydroxydaidzein, PA = Protocatechuic acid, PC = p-Coumaric acid, Qu = Quercetin, Re = Resorcinol, RL = Root length, RM = Root mass, RR = RRA, Ru = Rutin, Sa = Sand, Si = Silt, SA = Sinapic acid, SL = Sunlight, SM = Seed mass, SN = Seed number, SyA = Syringic acid, TF = Total flavonoids, TP = Total phenols, V = Velutin, WS = Wind speed.