| Literature DB >> 32577396 |
Alyssa M Worland1, Jeffrey J Czajka1, Yun Xing2, Willie F Harper2, Aryiana Moore3, Zhengyang Xiao1, Zhenlin Han4, Yechun Wang5, Wei Wen Su4, Yinjie J Tang1.
Abstract
This study employs biomass growth analyses andEntities:
Keywords: 13C-isotope tracing; Catabolite repression; Dimorphism; Metabolic network; β-carotene
Year: 2020 PMID: 32577396 PMCID: PMC7300164 DOI: 10.1016/j.mec.2020.e00130
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Metab Eng Commun ISSN: 2214-0301
Fig. 1Nitrogen limitation on W29 growth in YNB medium. Data is presented as averages of biological triplicates (n = 3).
Fig. 2Total protein content (a) and cell amino acid profiles (b) across different growth medium compositions (n = 2). oil = canola oil and “-N” = nitrogen-limited condition, where nitrogen was supplemented as ammonium sulfate at 0.01 g/L.
Fig. 3Amino acid labeling profiles of Cultures were grown on single and combinatory carbon sources, where one substrate was fully labeled and the other was unlabeled. The single labeled carbon source was performed as a control, with no additional unlabeled substrate added to the culture. The labeled substrates utilized in this study were: (a) 13C6 glucose, (b) 13C3 glycerol, and (c) 13C2 acetate. Samples were taken in the early exponential phase. Amino acid labeling profiles were measured and the fraction of total labeling is shown on the graphs. Values are averages of biological duplicates and error bars are standard deviations. (d) Metabolic pathway map indicating the contribution of carbon substrates to central carbon pathways and their amino acid production. Fatty acid substrates were seen to contributive to TCA cycle amino acids and metabolites (shaded blue and shaped round) while glucose and glycerol contributed foremost to glycolysis and pentose phosphate amino acids and metabolites (shaded red and shaped square). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Fig. 4Dynamic Labeling. W29 cultures were first grown with 13C6-glucose, then pulsed with unlabeled canola oil (a), oleic acid (b), or glycerol (c). Left graphs show 7 metabolites' labeling profiles over the course of the experiment. Canola oil and oleic acid cultures were sampled over 24 h, whereas glycerol was sampled up to 10 h, with an additional 20 s sample added in the middle. Middle graphs show the m0, m4 and m6 fragment changes over time for citrate. Right graphs show the m0, m3 and m6 fragment changes over time for G6P. Mass spectrometer peaks m1, m2, m3 means singly, doubly and triply 13C-labeled metabolites. Each data point for all graphs are averages of biological duplicates. The error bars on the far-left graphs of each pane are the standard deviations (n = 2). The error bars on the line graphs are within the markers and therefore are not shown here.
Fig. 5Effect of carbon substrate on β-carotene production. (A) Biomass and β-carotene production in different single and dual-carbon substrate cultures. The graph indicates 72-h cultivation results with OD600 shown in gray and β-carotene content (mg/OD600) in red. Values are an average of biological duplicates and error bars are the standard deviation. (B) High concentrations of lipid were used for β-carotene production. Harvest measurements were taken at 24, 72, and 96 h. Results are presented as β-carotene titer (mg/L). (C) The β-carotene strain was grown in different nitrogen conditions with glucose or canola oil. N sup. = excessive nitrogen supplementation (5 g/L of ammonium sulfate was added in YP medium to further decrease C:N ratio). Data represents the average of biological duplicates of β-carotene content per OD600 and β-carotene titer in mg/L. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Fig. 6Cell imaging and colony-forming units. (A) Effect of medium compositions on cell morphology (samples were taken during early growth phase). (B) CFU/OD600 ratios, which indicate inconsistent correlation between the number of CFU and OD600 due to variability of cell sizes. (C) Cell dry cell weight (DCW) versus OD600 measurement for W29 in rich (left) and minimal (right) medium.