Cory B Goff1,2, Susan C Walls3, David Rodriguez1, Caitlin R Gabor1. 1. Department of Biology, Texas State University, 601 University Dr. San Marcos, TX 78666, USA. 2. Department of Biology and Chemistry, Liberty University, 1971 University Blvd. Lynchburg, VA 24515, USA. 3. Wetland and Aquatic Research Center, U.S. Geological Survey, 7920 NW 71st St. Gainesville, FL 32653, USA.
Abstract
Environmental change associated with anthropogenic disturbance can lower habitat quality, especially for sensitive species such as many amphibians. Variation in environmental quality may affect an organism's physiological health and, ultimately, survival and fitness. Using multiple health measures can aid in identifying populations at increased risk of declines. Our objective was to measure environmental variables at multiple spatial scales and their effect on three indicators of health in ornate chorus frog (Pseudacris ornata) tadpoles to identify potential correlates of population declines. To accomplish this, we measured a glucocorticoid hormone (corticosterone; CORT) profile associated with the stress response, as well as the skin mucosal immune function (combined function of skin secretions and skin bacterial community) and bacterial communities of tadpoles from multiple ponds. We found that water quality characteristics associated with environmental variation, including higher water temperature, conductivity and total dissolved solids, as well as percent developed land nearby, were associated with elevated CORT release rates. However, mucosal immune function, although highly variable, was not significantly associated with water quality or environmental factors. Finally, we examined skin bacterial diversity as it aids in immunity and is affected by environmental variation. We found that skin bacterial diversity differed between ponds and was affected by land cover type, canopy cover and pond proximity. Our results indicate that both local water quality and land cover characteristics are important determinants of population health for ornate chorus frogs. Moreover, using these proactive measures of health over time may aid in early identification of at-risk populations that could prevent further declines and aid in management decisions.
Environmental change associated with anthropogenic disturbance can lower habitat quality, especially for sensitive species such as many amphibians. Variation in environmental quality may affect an organism's physiological health and, ultimately, survival and fitness. Using multiple health measures can aid in identifying populations at increased risk of declines. Our objective was to measure environmental variables at multiple spatial scales and their effect on three indicators of health in ornate chorus frog (Pseudacris ornata) tadpoles to identify potential correlates of population declines. To accomplish this, we measured a glucocorticoid hormone (corticosterone; CORT) profile associated with the stress response, as well as the skin mucosal immune function (combined function of skin secretions and skin bacterial community) and bacterial communities of tadpoles from multiple ponds. We found that water quality characteristics associated with environmental variation, including higher water temperature, conductivity and total dissolved solids, as well as percent developed land nearby, were associated with elevated CORT release rates. However, mucosal immune function, although highly variable, was not significantly associated with water quality or environmental factors. Finally, we examined skin bacterial diversity as it aids in immunity and is affected by environmental variation. We found that skin bacterial diversity differed between ponds and was affected by land cover type, canopy cover and pond proximity. Our results indicate that both local water quality and land cover characteristics are important determinants of population health for ornate chorus frogs. Moreover, using these proactive measures of health over time may aid in early identification of at-risk populations that could prevent further declines and aid in management decisions.
As the human population continues to increase, land-use conversion has altered habitat
suitability for many species (Vitousek ; McKinney, 2002).
Habitat loss, fragmentation and degradation, coupled with climate change and other
anthropogenic factors, are among the most significant drivers of population declines and
species extinctions (Brook ; Mantyka-Pringle ; Segan ;
Ceballos ).
Landscape-level disturbances such as habitat loss and degradation affect populations by
altering habitat connectivity, composition and quality (Fahrig, 2003). For aquatic organisms, local impacts on water quality such as
changes in temperature, pH, contaminant, nutrient and sediment levels (Meybeck, 2004) can also pose significant consequences to population
health and resilience. Together, the additive or synergistic effects are especially
troubling for species, especially those with complex life cycles that require multiple
habitats to complete development (Hayes ; Blaustein ). Examining physiological responses of individuals to such
factors can provide insight into the mechanisms by which environmental stressors can lead to
population declines (Wikelski and Cooke, 2006). In
turn, understanding the consequences of these factors on populations could aid in better
management practices for declining species.Glucocorticoid (GC) hormones can be useful tools to assess the physiological response of
organisms to environmental and anthropogenic stressors which, when combined with other
metrics (e.g., immune function), can be indicators of individual and population health
(Sheriff ; Dantzer ; Jeffrey ). In response to
stressors, GC hormones are released by the hypothalamo-pituitary-interrenal (HPI) axis above
baseline levels as an adaptive response that assists in energy mobilization, mediates
natural changes in physiology and behaviour, kick-starts the immune response and helps
return the organism to homeostasis (Dhabhar and McEwen,
1999; Sapolsky ; Cyr and Romero, 2009; Romero ). However, under
prolonged (chronic) stress, vertebrates may have elevated or lowered baseline GCs. In such
cases, the HPI axis can become dysregulated (where individuals have a muted response to
additional stressors), resulting in reduced physiological health, pathology and ultimately
death (Wingfield and Romero, 2001; McEwen and Wingfield, 2003; Cyr and Romero, 2009; Romero
). Vertebrates under chronic stress have suppressed
growth and development, reduced reproduction and reduced immune function (Sapolsky ; McEwen and Wingfield, 2003; Romero, 2004; Rollins-Smith,
2017). Pre-stressor baseline GC levels and the response to acute stressors (HPI
axis responsiveness) can be measured to aid in identifying whether populations are under
chronic stress, which may be associated with higher risk of declines (Homan ; Dantzer ; Baugh
; Gabor ). Measuring GC hormones may identify populations to target for
management but may not provide a full picture of environmental effects on population health.
Using additional metrics such as immune function and microbial diversity is needed for a
more holistic view of how environmental stressors impact population health (Breuner ).Amphibians have the highest threat status of all vertebrate classes (Stuart ; Foden ) and are particularly susceptible
to changes in habitat quality. Species that are especially vulnerable use ponds or other
water bodies to breed but occupy terrestrial habitats outside the breeding season (Becker ). As such, the
quality and conditions of both the aquatic and surrounding terrestrial environments play a
factor in the health of these amphibians. Environmental changes and conditions associated
with lower quality habitat may be perceived as stressors, which elevate or dysregulate GC
hormones and affect physiological health (Homan ; Janin , 2012; Chambers ; Gabor ). Amphibians
release the hormone corticosterone (CORT; the primary amphibian GC) when exposed to various
stressors, including increased pond drying, high salinity, extreme pH and temperature and
other water quality variables (Denver, 1998; Chambers ; Gomez-Mestre ; Narayan and Hero, 2014a, b; Burraco and Gomez-Mestre,
2016; Gabor ). In addition, landscape characteristics such as the extent of canopy cover and
forest fragmentation around breeding ponds, as well as substrate type, are significant
predictors of CORT in adult common toads (Bufo bufo; Janin , 2012) and spotted salamanders (Ambystoma maculatum; Homan ), and increased
CORT in Jollyville Plateau salamanders (Eurycea tonkawae) has been
associated with more urbanized streams (Gabor ). Landscape-level factors may also influence pond quality,
thus affecting aquatic larvae indirectly. Acute changes in pond water salinity can be lethal
for larval amphibians (Brown and Walls, 2013).
Canopy cover is known to influence amphibian assemblages, with higher amphibian diversity
and faster growth in open-canopy wetlands (Werner and
Glennemeier, 1999; Skelly ). However, increased temperatures associated with climate
change combined with open canopy wetlands may reduce wetland hydroperiod, which negatively
affects juvenile recruitment and larval survival (Semlitsch ; Daszak
). These findings suggest a link between habitat
quality at multiple spatial scales and physiological health in amphibians.Microbiota play a role in amphibian immune response to disease (Harris ; Woodhams ) and may vary with abiotic
factors (Bletz ;
Jani and Briggs, 2018; Varela ), across populations (Kueneman ; Hernandez-Gomez ; Jani and Briggs, 2018) and among species (Kueneman ; Belden ; Varela ). Microbiota
living on the skin combined with skin secretions make up the mucosome, or micro-ecosystem of
the skin, providing the first line of defence in amphibian disease resistance (Woodhams ; Harris ; Woodhams ). Identifying
the bacterial community of amphibians in a population and the ability of their mucosome to
fight infection (mucosome function; Woodhams ) can be used to predict disease risk across populations (Woodhams ). Elevated CORT
over prolonged periods is associated with disease (Warne
; Gabor ; Peterson ; Gabor , 2018; Kindermann ), is
immunosuppressive (reviewed in Rollins-Smith,
2017), inhibits production of amphibian skin peptides (Rollins-Smith ) and affects gut microbial
communities in other taxa (Clarke ). Further, the microbiome of amphibians shifts with temperature (Kohl and Yahn, 2016), soil pH, precipitation (Varela ) and infection
intensity (Jani and Briggs, 2018). Therefore,
reduced habitat quality and increased stress from environmental stressors may be associated
with altered skin bacterial communities and immunity in amphibians, which could lead to
increased declines.To explore potential underlying causes of population declines in the ornate chorus frog
(Pseudacris ornata), we measured environmental variables at multiple
spatial scales, including pond water quality and surrounding landscape characteristics, and
examined their effect on three health metrics in tadpoles. Because of the known interactions
between habitat quality and population health, we measured and examined the relationships of
these variables with CORT release rates, mucosome function, and bacterial community
diversity from populations of P. ornata across their range. We tested
several hypotheses to assess whether environmental quality affects tadpole health: first, we
quantified baseline and acute stress-induced CORT release rates for tadpoles collected
across the species’ range as a measure of the CORT profiles for a pond. We hypothesized that
habitat quality at multiple spatial scales affects CORT release rates and therefore the CORT
profile in P. ornata larvae, as environmental conditions are associated
with altered physiological health in amphibians (Homan
; Janin , 2012; Chambers ; Gabor ). We measured pond
water quality [temperature, pH, conductivity and total dissolved solids (TDSs)] as well as
land cover characteristics (percent canopy, land cover type and percent developed land) at
three spatial scales surrounding each pond. We also tested the hypotheses that these
environmental conditions and CORT release rates are associated with altered immune function
and an altered skin bacterial community, as both environment and stress are associated with
altered immune defences (Rollins-Smith, 2017; Bletz ; Jani and Briggs, 2018; Varela ). Our examination of multiple
metrics of population health allows us to potentially identify links between environmental
stress from reduced habitat quality and population declines which could aid in management
practices.
Materials and methods
Study species
The ornate chorus frog (P. ornata) is endemic to the southeastern
Coastal Plain and longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) ecosystem of the
southeastern USA (Means, 2006). This frog has a
disjunct range that extends from North Carolina south to Florida and west to Louisiana
(Enge ; Powell ). The ornate
chorus frog is a longleaf pine specialist common throughout the panhandle and northern
regions of Florida in mesic and xeric habitats, but this species has been declining along
its southern range edge in the Florida peninsula and western edge in Louisiana (Bartlett and Bartlett, 2011; Enge ). Declines are potentially caused
by increased temperatures, droughts and reduced habitat quality associated with fire
suppression (Means and Simberloff, 1987; Enge ). Fire suppression
and insufficient management can reduce environmental quality for species endemic to
pyrogenic systems, such as P. ornata and the longleaf pine-wiregrass
(P. palustris-Aristida spp.) ecosystem of the southeastern USA (Noss, 2013, 2018). Hydroperiod is also considered an important factor associated with
P. ornata population persistence, as this species requires fishless,
seasonally inundated water bodies with a 3- to 4-month hydroperiod for complete tadpole
development (Semlitsch ; Enge ). Though little is known about the adult frog, it is known to be fossorial,
using loose, sandy soils to burrow and has been found over 400 m from breeding ponds
(Brown and Means, 1984). Adults are winter
breeders, with males calling as early as November, with actual breeding occurring December
or January through March, when females deposit eggs on submerged vertical vegetation
(Dorcas and Gibbons, 2008; Enge ). Roadside
ditches, flooded fields and marshes adjacent to forested areas, as well as pine and
mixed-woodland ponds can serve as aquatic breeding sites (Dorcas and Gibbons, 2008; Bartlett
and Bartlett, 2011; Enge ; Powell ). However, most breeding ponds are found within sandhills,
flatwoods, wetlands and pine forest/plantations and are associated with open-canopy sites
with herbaceous understory, characteristic of a short-interval fire regime (Gorman ; Noss, 2013; Enge
; Noss,
2018).
Field sampling
We collected tadpoles (stages 30–40; Gosner,
1960) across 7 properties and up to 4 ponds (Sites) per property (Property) for a
total of 16 ponds throughout the species’ range in Florida, Georgia and South Carolina
(Table 1; Fig.
1). Ponds were sampled 2–23 March 2016 and 23 February–14 March 2017 (Table 1). At each pond, we recorded water temperature,
conductivity and TDS; pH was also collected from ponds in 2017 (Table 2). Additionally, we conducted a geographic information
systems analysis of land cover at each pond using land cover class and percent canopy
cover data from the National Land Cover Database (NLCD, 2011). Using ArcMap (ESRI,
Redlands, CA), we created a 100, 500 and 1000 m buffer around each pond. Land cover
classes were determined for each 30 m pixel within the three spatial scales. The 16 land
cover types recognized by the NLCD were combined into six classes for analysis:
Agriculture, Developed, Forest, Shrub, Water and Wetlands. The Agriculture class included
grasslands, pasture and cultivated crops; Developed included all intensities of developed
and barren land; Forest included deciduous, evergreen and mixed forest cover; Shrub
consisted of short, woody plants; Water was characterized by open ponds; and Wetlands
included woody and emergent herbaceous wetlands. We then quantified the percent of each
land cover type and the percent canopy cover within the three spatial scales using the
zonal statistics as a table tool in ArcMap. We used the primary land cover class, percent
developed land and percent canopy cover for each of the three spatial scales in
analyses.
Table 1
Pond property, state, sites within each property and dates sampled
Region
State
Site
Dates sampled
Eglin Air Force Base
FL
EG1
2 March 2016 and 23 February 2017
EG2
24 February 2017
Apalachicola National Forest
FL
AP1
3 March 2016 and 26 February 2017
AP2
4 March 2016 and 25 February 2017
AP3
4 March 2016
St. Marks National Wildlife Refuge
FL
SM1
8 March 2016
SM2
8 March 2016
SM3
28 February 2017
SM4
1 March 2017
Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center at Ichauway
GA
JC1
22 March 2016 and 4 March 2017
JC2
22 March 2016 and 2 March 2017
JC3
23 March 2016 and 3 March 2017
Lafayette Forest Wildlife Environmental Area
FL
LF1
15–16 March 2016
Orianne Society Preserve
GA
OS1
9 March 2017
OS2
10 March 2017
James W. Webb Wildlife Center
SC
WC1
14 March 2017
Figure 1
Approximate pond locations (blue dots) throughout the range of Pseudacris
ornata. Pink shading represents historical range (International Union for the Conservation of Nature [IUCN], 2019)
and orange shading represents newest range map (Powell ). Ponds are located on the following
properties: Apalachicola National Forest (NF), Eglin Air Force Base (AFB), Joseph W.
Jones Ecological Research Center at Ichauway, Lafayette Forest Wildlife Environmental
Area (WEA), St. Marks National Wildlife Refuge (NWR), Orianne Society Preserve and the
James W. Webb Wildlife Center.
Table 2
Water quality variable ranges and average values across all sites sampled for each
year
Variable
Range
Average
2016
2017
2016
2017
Water Temperature (°C)
13.6–23.1
11.3–24.3
17.2
19.2
Conductivity (μs/cm)
12.1–49.4
13.0–48.7
22.8
25.5
pH
N/A
4.12–5.95
N/A
5.17
Pond property, state, sites within each property and dates sampledApproximate pond locations (blue dots) throughout the range of Pseudacris
ornata. Pink shading represents historical range (International Union for the Conservation of Nature [IUCN], 2019)
and orange shading represents newest range map (Powell ). Ponds are located on the following
properties: Apalachicola National Forest (NF), Eglin Air Force Base (AFB), Joseph W.
Jones Ecological Research Center at Ichauway, Lafayette Forest Wildlife Environmental
Area (WEA), St. Marks National Wildlife Refuge (NWR), Orianne Society Preserve and the
James W. Webb Wildlife Center.Water quality variable ranges and average values across all sites sampled for each
year
Water-borne CORT release rates
In 2016 and 2017, we used a non-invasive water-borne hormone method (Gabor ) to
measure CORT release rates from up to 40 individual tadpoles from each pond (Supplementary Table S1). This method
measures CORT secreted through the skin, urine and faeces, which provides an integrated
measure of the cumulative effects of chronic stress (Sheriff ; Dantzer
). We captured tadpoles using dipnets and then
placed individuals in 250 ml beakers, one individual per beaker, containing 100 ml of
bottled spring water and a perforated Nalgene liner. This liner allowed us to remove the
tadpole but leave the water sample in the beaker. Half of the individuals were
unmanipulated for 1 hour to obtain baseline CORT release rates and the other half were
agitated by shaking the beakers for 1 min every 3 min for 1 hour to measure the response
to this acute agitation stressor (Gabor ; Forsburg ). These baseline and agitationCORT release rates represent
the treatment categories. After 1 hour, we removed the liner with the individual from each
beaker and poured the water containing leached hormones into HDPE plastic cups. Samples
were maintained on ice and transported to the laboratory for immediate extraction or
frozen at −20°C to be processed at a later time (Ellis
). Frozen samples were extracted within 1 week of
collection. We photographed each tadpole from the side with a ruler for scale before
releasing it back into the pond. Snout-vent length (SVL, in mm) was measured from
photographs using the program ImageJ (Rosband,
1997). In 2017, all tadpoles from which water-borne hormones were collected were
also swabbed for skin bacterial community analysis. After the water samples containing
leached hormones were collected, each individual was swabbed ventrally from the mouth to
the vent using a single, sterile swab. The cotton tips of each swab were placed in
Eppendorf tubes, frozen and transported back to the lab for analysis.
Hormone extraction and validation
Once defrosted, we filtered each water sample through standard coffee filters (equivalent
to grade 4 filter paper) to remove large debris and faecal material. All samples were then
drawn through C18 solid phase extraction (SPE) columns (SepPak Vac 3 cc/500 mg; Waters,
Inc.) primed with 4 ml methanol and 4 ml distilled water (Gabor ). After hormone extraction, SPE
columns containing the hormone residue were stored at −20°C for up to 3 months before
elution. We eluted columns with 4 ml methanol into borosilicate test tubes. Eluted samples
were dried using nitrogen gas flowing through an Evap-O-Rac (Cole-Palmer) while sitting in
a hot water bath (37°C). Each dried sample was then resuspended in a mixture of 5% ethanol
and 95% enzyme-immunoassay (EIA) buffer (Cayman Chemical Company, Inc.) to a final volume
of 260 μl. We also ran blank controls of bottled spring water resuspended to a final
volume of 130 μl. We reconstituted at the minimum volume required to plate each sample in
duplicate (with some leftover) because water samples have such low CORT values. The
samples were resuspended to 260 μl to dilute the CORT concentrations to within the range
of the standard curve. Each sample was run in duplicate on CORT EIA plates
(N = 26; # 501320, Cayman Chemical Company, Inc.) and absorbance was
read using a spectrophotometer plate reader (BioTek ELX 800) set to 405 nm. Final CORT
values (pg/ml) were multiplied by amount resuspended (0.260 ml) and divided by SVL for
final unit of pg/mm per hour. Water samples were multiplied by reconstitution volume
(0.130 ml) and the relevant spring water values (5.4–15.6 pg/sample) were subtracted from
the CORT release rates of each tadpole (adjusted range: 17.8–1957.4 pg/mm per hour).The water-borne CORT collection method was validated for P. ornata using
a pooled sample of hormones from seven non-experimental tadpoles serially diluted
(following Gabor ).
We examined parallelism of the serial dilution curve (1:1–1:32) of the pooled sample to
the known standard curve (comparison of slopes, t11 = 1.304,
P = 0.22). We also assessed quantitative recovery by spiking the pooled
sample with each of eight standards. The observed recovery ranged from 62.0% to 82.3%, and
we found a linear relationship between observed and expected slopes (β = 0.77,
F1,6 = 1817.75, R2 = 0.997,
P < 0.0001). Using a different pooled control sample run in
quadruplicate on each plate, we examined the intra- and inter-plate variation of the 26
plates. Intra-plate variation ranged from 0.29–16.33% and mean inter-plate variation was
13.11%. The sensitivity of the CORT EIA plates ranged from 41.47 to 1390.60 pg/ml on
average.
Mucosome function
In 2017, 1 ml water was removed from each baseline CORT sample and stored at −20°C to
assess mucosome function. A subset of these samples was used to assess mucosome function
of individuals from each pond (Supplementary Table S1). Using the Cell Titer Glo 2 kit (Promega), a 25-μl water
sample—containing host skin peptides, mucosal antibodies and bacterial communities—was
combined with a 25-μl solution of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis
(Bd) zoospores with known concentration (approximately 25 000 total
zoospores per 25 μl) on 96-well plates (Barnhardt,
2018). Bd zoospores were collected from plate cultures of
isolate JEL423, which is within the Global Panzootic Lineage (BdGPL), by flooding 3- to
5-day-old culture plates with autoclaved water to stimulate zoospore release from
zoosporangia. This Bd strain was used because it was readily available,
easy to grow in the laboratory and detected across North America (Farrer ; Rosenblum ; Marshall ). Each mucosome sample was
then plated in triplicate to assess Bd viability in the presence of the
mucosome. In addition, six heat-killed Bd standards (0%, 20%, 40%, 60%,
80%, 100%) were plated in triplicate. After incubation for 1 hour at room temperature,
50 μl of Cell Titer Glo reagent was added to each well and placed on an orbital shaker at
200 rpm for 2 min and incubated at room temperature for an additional 15 min. A
luminescent plate reader was then used (Biotek Synergy H1) to assess the percent cell
viability from a ratio of live:dead Bd to determine the mucosome function
against the pathogen. The gain of the plate reader was set at 150.
Skin bacterial diversity
We extracted DNA from skin swabs of approximately 10 tadpoles per pond (Supplementary Table S1) using 50 μl
of PrepMan (Applied Biosystems, Inc.) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Swabs and
extracts were spun down briefly then the swab was inverted with sterile forceps and spun
down again at 2 348 x g for 1 min. The swab was removed from the tube with sterile forceps
and the remaining extract was centrifuged at 21 130 x g for 5 mins to pellet any
precipitates. Without disturbing the pellet, 40 μl of extract was transferred to a new
1.5-ml centrifuge tube (adapted from Becker ). The purified extracts were used to generate PCR amplicons
of bacterial 16S V4 properties using 515F and GOLAY barcoded 806R primers (Caporaso ) following the
Earth Microbiome Protocol (Gilbert ). Amplicons were quantified using a Qubit dsDNA Broad
sensitivity Assay Kit (Invitrogen) and, after normalizing and pooling, amplicons were size
selected on a BluePippen (SageScience, Inc.) using a 2% agarose 100–600 Bp cartridge, the
resulting fraction was cleaned using AMPure XP magnetic beads (Beckman Coulter, Inc). The
pooled library size (~350 Bp) and concentration were verified on a TapeStation 2200
(Agilent Technologies, Inc.) using a D1000 screen tape and reagents. Sequencing was
performed on a MiSeq instrument (Illumina, Inc.) using the 600-cycle MiSeq Reagent Kit v3.
The resulting reads from the MiSeq were trimmed of adapters and parsed in BaseSpace
(Illumina, Inc.) according to their respective barcode. The dada2 version 1.5.0 pipeline
(Callahan ) in R
(version 3.5.2; R Core Team, 2018) was used to
first inspect read quality profiles and then filter and trim reads. Reverse reads were not
used in downstream analyses owing to low quality, and thus, paired read merging was
skipped after dereplication. Forward sequence reads were trimmed to 220 Bp based on their
quality profile. Taxonomy assignment was performed using dada2 formatted FASTA file from
the Silva taxonomic training data (version 132). The resulting dada2 tables were merged
with the sample metadata and analysed using phyloseq (McMurdie and Holmes, 2013). Using phyloseq, samples were rarified to 25 000
sequences (average number of sequences = 229 663) and alpha diversity indices (Richness,
Shannon and Simpson) were calculated. Richness is the number of species present, whereas
Shannon diversity and Simpson diversity are based on the proportion of individuals of a
particular species within the sample. The Shannon diversity index provides a value of
diversity from estimating how likely an unknown individual is from a known species.
Simpson diversity places a higher importance on dominant or more abundant species and is
the probability two individuals are from different species. In these indices, a higher
value (uncertainty/probability) indicates a higher diversity. Measuring all three indices
provides a more complete picture of the bacterial diversity and composition on the
amphibian skin. The final data set consisted of 8 337 operational taxonomic units (OTUs)
across 98 samples.
Statistical analysis
All analyses were run using R (version 3.5.2; R Core
Team 2018). First, to determine if there was spatial autocorrelation in CORT
profiles across ponds, distance-based Moran’s eigenvector mapping (MEM) was used to map
longitude and latitude for each pond and build spatial predictors using the following
packages: adespatial (Dray ), geosphere (Hijmans, 2017) and
vegan (Oksanen ).
Permutation analysis of variance (ANOVA) on the distance-based Moran axes identified two
of three spatial axes as significant predictors of CORT variation. These two spatial axes,
MEM2 and MEM3, corresponded to scaled distance measures of longitude and latitude,
respectively. These axes were extracted and incorporated into model building. Eigenvalues
for these two positive spatial axes were −0.78 and 0.24, respectively, indicating they
represent autocorrelation between ponds at a fine spatial scale.We developed linear mixed effect (lme) models in the package nlme (Pinheiro and Bates, 2018) to examine predictors of (i) CORT release
rates, (ii) mucosome function and (iii) skin bacterial diversity indices (Richness,
Shannon, Simpson) among ponds as separate response variables. All models for all response
variables included Site as a random effect. CORT models examined natural log-transformed
CORT release rates standardized by SVL (pg/mm per hour) as the response variable. Prior to
building models, we first ran a preliminary analysis of models containing each land cover
characteristic calculated from NLCD variables (landcover type, percent urban development
and percent canopy cover) at each spatial scale as sole predictors for each of the
response variables. To determine the most important scale for the three predictors, the
models containing the landcover characteristic at the different scales were ranked
according to Akaike’s information criterion adjusted for small sample size (AICc) and the
scale included in the highest ranked model was retained for subsequent models. Water
quality variables (water temperature, conductivity, TDS, pH) from all ponds were combined
using a principle components analysis (PCA) to reduce the number of variables in analyses.
We ran analyses to assess predictors of CORT release rates for each year (2016 and 2017)
separately, as not all ponds were sampled in both years and pH was an additional pond
characteristic added in 2017. For 2016, PCA revealed that PC1 accounted for 83.3% of the
variation in the data and was driven by conductivity and TDS, whereas PC2 accounted for
16.7% of the variation and was mainly driven by water temperature (Table 3). In 2017, PC1 accounted for 59.6% of the variation and
was driven by conductivity and TDS, whereas PC2 accounted for 26.4% of the variation and
was driven by water temperature (Table 3). To test
the relationship of predictors to each of the three response variables, models
incorporated main effects including the dominant land cover type within 100 m of ponds
(Landcover100), the percent developed land within 1000 m of ponds (Urban1000), the percent
canopy cover within 500 m of ponds (Canopy500), PC1 and PC2 for each year, spatial axes
(MEM2 and MEM3), the property each pond was located within (Property), as well as additive
models. We created a total of 28 models for analyses (Supplementary Table S2).
Additionally, we analysed each treatment (Baseline or Agitation) separately within each
year. A similar list of models was used to examine predictors of mucosome function and
skin microbial diversity (Supplementary
Tables S3 and S4),
substituting the correct scale of the landscape predictors as determined by separate
preliminary analyses and adding baseline CORT release rates (BCORT) as a sole predictor in
an additional model. Because other analyses were run to assess impacts of both Site and
Property on skin bacterial diversity indices (PERMANOVA; see below), Property was not
included as a predictor in the bacterial diversity models. This resulted in 29 models for
mucosome analysis and 28 models for skin bacterial diversity analysis. We used each
bacterial diversity index (Richness, Shannon and Simpson) as a separate response variable
in separate analyses involving the entire model set. All models were ranked according to
Akaike information criterion corrected for small sample size (AICc) using the
package MuMIn (Barton 2018). We calculated
parameters using the maximum-likelihood estimation during the model-selection process.
Model-averaged parameter estimates, unconditional standard error (SE) and unconditional
95% CIs were calculated for candidate models (ΔAICc < 2) using the package AICcmodavg
(Mazerolle 2019). In addition, we ran
independent t-tests to compare baseline and agitation-induced CORT
release rates for each pond and year separately to specifically address which populations
might be chronically stressed, indicated by an inability to mount a CORT response above
baseline levels. We also ran an ANOVA and Levene’s test using the package lawstat (Gastwirth ) to examine
differences in mean mucosome function and mean variance across Sites.
Table 3
Eigenvectors and principle components for PCA of water quality variables collected at
ponds in 2016 and 2017
Variable
2016
2017
PC1
PC2
PC1
PC2
W_Temp
0.503
−0.858
−0.206
0.876
Conductivity
0.620
0.274
−0.630
0.116
TDS
0.602
0.435
−0.614
−0.091
pH
0.429
0.460
Variables that loaded heavily on components are in bold.
Eigenvectors and principle components for PCA of water quality variables collected at
ponds in 2016 and 2017Variables that loaded heavily on components are in bold.Means of each of the three alpha diversity indices were compared across Site and
Property. We analysed mean Shannon diversity across Sites and Properties using an ANOVA.
Because data were non-normal, we used a Kruskal–Wallis test to compare the mean Richness
and Simpson diversity across Sites and Properties. The relative contribution of Site and
Property to microbiome diversity (beta diversity) were analysed using PERMANOVA (Adonis;
999 permutations) using the package vegan (Oksanen
). All pairwise comparisons were assessed for
significant factors using the package pairwiseAdonis (Martinez Arbizu, 2019). Beta diversity of skin bacterial communities (OTUs) were
plotted using the Bray–Curtis method of non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) and the
following packages: phyloseq (McMurdie and Holmes,
2013) and ggplot2 (Wickham, 2016).
Results
AICc model selection indicated six candidate models (ΔAICc < 2) to predict baseline
CORT release rates and five candidate models to predict agitationCORT release rates for
sites sampled in 2016 (Supplementary
Table S5). Model averaged parameter estimates indicated both PCs and both spatial
axes were top predictors of baseline CORT release rates, though no predictor was
significant (CI did not overlap 0; Table 4). Model
averaged parameter estimates indicated both PCs and MEM3 (scaled latitude) were
significant predictors of agitationCORT release rates in 2016 (Table 4). AgitationCORT release rates were higher in ponds with
higher conductivity and TDS (positive loading on PC1; Fig.
2a) and lower in ponds with lower water temperature (negative loading on PC2;
Fig. 2b). Additionally, agitationCORT release
rates were higher at lower MEM3 values (Fig. 3). For
2017, two models predicting baseline CORT release rates and two models predicting
agitationCORT release rates had a ΔAICc < 2 (Supplementary Table S6). Model averaged parameter estimates indicated
the percent developed land within 1000 m of ponds was a significant predictor of both
baseline and agitationCORT release rates for ponds sampled in 2017 (Table 5). Baseline and agitationCORT release rates were both
higher in ponds with more developed land within 1000 m (Fig.
4). In 2016, the marginal R for the top model
explaining baseline and agitationCORT release rates were 0.24 and 0.26, respectively. The
conditional R for these same models were 0.34 and 0.32,
respectively. The marginal R is calculated using only the
fixed effects, whereas the conditional R includes both fixed
and random effects. Therefore, the inclusion of random effects and fixed effects explained
more variation in CORT release rates than fixed effects alone. The difference between
marginal and conditional R values was greater for 2017, where
the marginal R for the top model explaining baseline CORT
release rates was 0.23, and for agitation was 0.21, with the conditional
R values of 0.38 and 0.60, respectively. Average CORT
release rates across both years were highest at the site in Lafayette Forest Wildlife
Environmental Area (LF1; Fig. 5). Examining CORT
release rates within each treatment for each pond indicated 40% (N = 4)
of ponds sampled in 2016 and 50% (N = 6) of ponds sampled in 2017 did not
show significant differences between baseline and agitationCORT release rates, though
only one population (JC3) did not show a difference across both years (Supplementary Table S7; Fig. 5). However, not all ponds were resampled both years
owing to a lack of tadpoles or complete loss of the pond in one case.
Table 4
Model averaged parameter estimates, unconditional SE and unconditional 95% CIs of
environmental variables on baseline and agitation CORT release rates of
Pseudacris ornata tadpoles from 10 sites sampled in 2016
Response
Predictor
Estimate
SE
Lower 95% CI
Upper 95% CI
Baseline CORT
PC1
0.1798
0.094
−0.0045
0.3641
PC2
−0.2249
0.1167
−0.4537
0.0039
MEM2
0.1981
0.1097
−0.0169
0.4131
MEM3
0.0068
0.2336
−0.4511
0.4647
Agitation CORT
PC1
0.1902
0.0447
0.1026
0.2778
PC2
−0.2857
0.098
−0.4777
−0.0936
MEM2
0.0808
0.0814
−0.0787
0.2403
MEM3
−0.2326
0.0517
−0.334
−0.1313
Canopy500
−0.008
0.0059
−0.0194
0.0035
Only parameters from the top-ranking models (ΔAICc < 2) are included. Bolded terms
indicate parameters used for inference whose 95% CIs do not overlap 0.
Figure 2
Relationship between agitation CORT release rates (pg/mm per hour) and (a) PC1 or (b)
PC2 values. Data were collected from P. ornata tadpoles and ponds
sampled in 2016. Untransformed data are shown. Ponds: AP = Apalachicola National
Forest, EG = Eglin Air Force Base, JC = Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center at
Ichauway, LF = Lafayette Forest Wildlife Environmental Area, SM = St. Marks National
Wildlife Refuge.
Figure 3
Relationship between agitation corticosterone release rates (pg/mm per hour) and MEM3
values. Data were collected from P. ornata tadpoles and ponds sampled
in 2016. Untransformed data are shown. Ponds: AP = Apalachicola National Forest,
EG = Eglin Air Force Base, JC = Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center at
Ichauway, LF = Lafayette Forest Wildlife Environmental Area, SM = St. Marks National
Wildlife Refuge.
Table 5
Model averaged parameter estimates, unconditional SE and unconditional 95% CIs of
environmental variables on baseline and agitation CORT release rates, mucosome
function and bacterial diversity (Richness, Shannon and Simpson) of P.
ornata tadpoles from 12 sites sampled in 2017
Response
Predictor
Estimate
SE
Lower 95% CI
Upper 95% CI
Baseline CORT
Urban1000
0.117
0.037
0.046
0.189
PC2
0.082
0.103
−0.120
0.284
Agitation CORT
Urban1000
0.126
0.053
0.022
0.231
PC1
−0.039
0.086
−0.206
0.129
Mucosome
PC1
−0.396
0.770
−1.905
1.113
PC2
−2.279
1.320
−4.866
0.309
Urban100
−0.095
0.076
−0.244
0.054
Canopy500
−0.718
0.096
−0.259
0.116
Bacterial richness
Landcover1000: Forest
386.824
32.137
323.836
449.811
Landcover1000: Wetlands
−265.525
89.063
−440.085
−90.965
Landcover1000: Shrub
−147.176
69.089
−282.588
−11.763
PC1
12.786
16.991
−20.516
46.087
Shannon diversity
Urban500
0.060
0.027
0.006
0.114
Canopy100
−0.012
−0.006
−0.023
−0.002
PC1
0.093
0.076
−0.056
0.241
PC2
−0.167
0.096
−0.356
0.021
MEM2
0.251
0.110
0.036
0.466
Simpson diversity
MEM2
0.046
0.014
0.019
0.073
MEM3
0.024
0.031
−0.036
0.084
Only parameters from the top-ranking models (ΔAICc < 2) are included. Bolded terms
indicate parameters used for inference whose 95% CIs do not overlap 0.
Figure 4
Relationship between (a) baseline and (b) agitation CORT release rates (pg/mm per
hour) and the percent developed land within 1000 m. Data were collected from
P. ornata tadpoles and ponds sampled in 2017. Untransformed data
are shown. Ponds: AP = Apalachicola National Forest, EG = Eglin Air Force Base,
JC = Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center at Ichauway, LF = Lafayette Forest
Wildlife Environmental Area, SM = St. Marks National Wildlife Refuge.
Figure 5
Mean (± SE) CORT release rates (pg/mm per hour; untransformed data shown) of
P. ornata tadpoles for both treatments (Baseline or Agitation) at
each pond across both years. Blue circles = Baseline values, Red triangles = Agitation
values. Asterisks indicate significant differences. Ponds: AP = Apalachicola National
Forest, EG = Eglin Air Force Base, JC = Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center at
Ichauway, LF = Lafayette Forest Wildlife Environmental Area, SM = St. Marks National
Wildlife Refuge, OS = Orianne Society Preserve, WC = James W. Webb Wildlife Center.
Ponds are ordered geographically from west to east.
Model averaged parameter estimates, unconditional SE and unconditional 95% CIs of
environmental variables on baseline and agitationCORT release rates of
Pseudacris ornata tadpoles from 10 sites sampled in 2016Only parameters from the top-ranking models (ΔAICc < 2) are included. Bolded terms
indicate parameters used for inference whose 95% CIs do not overlap 0.Relationship between agitationCORT release rates (pg/mm per hour) and (a) PC1 or (b)
PC2 values. Data were collected from P. ornata tadpoles and ponds
sampled in 2016. Untransformed data are shown. Ponds: AP = Apalachicola National
Forest, EG = Eglin Air Force Base, JC = Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center at
Ichauway, LF = Lafayette Forest Wildlife Environmental Area, SM = St. Marks National
Wildlife Refuge.Relationship between agitationcorticosterone release rates (pg/mm per hour) and MEM3
values. Data were collected from P. ornata tadpoles and ponds sampled
in 2016. Untransformed data are shown. Ponds: AP = Apalachicola National Forest,
EG = Eglin Air Force Base, JC = Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center at
Ichauway, LF = Lafayette Forest Wildlife Environmental Area, SM = St. Marks National
Wildlife Refuge.Model averaged parameter estimates, unconditional SE and unconditional 95% CIs of
environmental variables on baseline and agitationCORT release rates, mucosome
function and bacterial diversity (Richness, Shannon and Simpson) of P.
ornata tadpoles from 12 sites sampled in 2017Only parameters from the top-ranking models (ΔAICc < 2) are included. Bolded terms
indicate parameters used for inference whose 95% CIs do not overlap 0.Relationship between (a) baseline and (b) agitationCORT release rates (pg/mm per
hour) and the percent developed land within 1000 m. Data were collected from
P. ornata tadpoles and ponds sampled in 2017. Untransformed data
are shown. Ponds: AP = Apalachicola National Forest, EG = Eglin Air Force Base,
JC = Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center at Ichauway, LF = Lafayette Forest
Wildlife Environmental Area, SM = St. Marks National Wildlife Refuge.Mean (± SE) CORT release rates (pg/mm per hour; untransformed data shown) of
P. ornata tadpoles for both treatments (Baseline or Agitation) at
each pond across both years. Blue circles = Baseline values, Red triangles = Agitation
values. Asterisks indicate significant differences. Ponds: AP = Apalachicola National
Forest, EG = Eglin Air Force Base, JC = Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center at
Ichauway, LF = Lafayette Forest Wildlife Environmental Area, SM = St. Marks National
Wildlife Refuge, OS = Orianne Society Preserve, WC = James W. Webb Wildlife Center.
Ponds are ordered geographically from west to east.There was no significant difference in the mean mucosome function across all ponds
(ANOVA: F11,109 = 0.476, P = 0.914; Supplementary Fig. S1). Levene’s
test further determined no difference in the mean variance across all ponds
(W = 1.19; P = 0.302). Mean Bd
viability in the presence of the mucosome was 88.1%. Five candidate models (ΔAICc < 2)
were selected from AICc model selection to explain the variation in mucosome function
(Supplementary Table S6).
These models included PC1, PC2, percent developed land within 100 m (Urban100) and the
percent canopy within 500 m (Canopy500) as top predictors, though model averaged parameter
estimates did not indicate any significant predictor (Table 5).Alpha diversity of skin bacterial communities differed across Sites and Properties in
both Richness and Shannon diversity (Richness, Site:
χ2 = 42.80, df = 9, P < 0.001; Property:
χ2 = 35.60, df = 5, P < 0.001; Shannon,
Site: F9,88 = 2.32, P = 0.022; Property:
F5,92 = 3.18, P = 0.011), but not in
Simpson diversity (Simpson, Site: χ2 = 13.88, df = 9,
P = 0.127; Property: χ2 = 7.61, df = 5,
P = 0.179). Measures of diversity tended to be highest at sites within
the Jones Center and lowest at sites within Eglin AFB, with the exception of Richness that
was lowest within Apalachicola National Forest (Supplementary Table S8). Two candidate models (ΔAICc < 2) were
selected to explain the variation in Richness across sites (Supplementary Table S6). Model
averaged parameter estimates indicated dominant land cover within 1000 m of each pond was
a significant predictor of bacterial richness (Table
5; Fig. 6), with Richness being highest in
forest and lower in large wetlands and in ponds surrounded by shrubby vegetation. The top
model explaining Richness had a marginal R of 0.24 and a
conditional R of 0.36, indicating some of the variation was
attributed to the random effect of Site. Six candidate models were selected to explain
Shannon diversity (Supplementary Table
S6). Model averaged parameter estimates indicated that the percent developed land
within 500 m (Urban500; Supplementary
Fig. S2) and the percent canopy cover within 100 m (Canopy100; Fig. 7a) were significant predictors of Shannon diversity (Table 5; Fig.
7a), with diversity being higher in ponds surrounded by more developed land and
lower in ponds with more canopy cover. Additionally, Shannon diversity was higher as MEM2
increased (Table 5; Fig. 7b). The marginal and conditional R for the
top model explaining Shannon diversity were 0.07 and 0.10, respectively. Two candidate
models were selected to explain Simpson diversity across ponds (Supplementary Table S6), with MEM2
(scaled longitude) being the only significant predictor (Table 5; Fig. 8). As MEM2 increased,
Simpson diversity also increased. The marginal and conditional
R for the top model explaining Simpson diversity was 0.14.
Prominent bacterial families included Burkholderiaceae, Sphingomonadaceae,
Xanthomonadaceae, Pseudomonadaceae, Enterobacteriaceae and Desulfovibrionaceae (Fig. 9). The relative contribution of both Site and
Property accounted for significant variation in microbiome beta diversity when analysed
with a permutational ANOVA (Site: ADONIS R2 = 0.47,
P = 0.001; Property: ADONIS R2 = 0.32,
P = 0.001). All pairwise comparisons between Sites were significant
(P < 0.05) except for the comparison of site AP1 to AP2
(F = 1.46, P = 0.144) and AP1 to SM4 (F = 1.58,
P = 0.117; Supplementary Table S9). All pairwise comparisons between Properties were
significant (P < 0.001) except for the comparison of the Apalachicola
Property to St. Marks (F = 1.80, P = 0.066; Supplementary Table S10). An
ordination plot based on the Bray–Curtis method of NMDS showed bacterial community
similarities within Sites and across Properties (Fig.
10).
Figure 6
Mean ± SE skin bacterial richness of P. ornata tadpoles and the
relationship with the dominant land cover type within 1000 m (Landcover1000) of each
pond.
Figure 7
Shannon diversity of skin bacterial communities of P. ornata
tadpoles varied significantly with (a) percent canopy cover within 100 m of each pond
and (b) MEM2. Ponds: AP = Apalachicola National Forest, EG = Eglin Air Force Base,
JC = Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center at Ichauway, LF = Lafayette Forest
Wildlife Environmental Area, SM = St. Marks National Wildlife Refuge, OS = Orianne
Society Preserve, WC = James W. Webb Wildlife Center.
Figure 8
Simpson diversity of skin bacterial communities of P. ornata
tadpoles varied significantly with MEM2. Ponds: AP = Apalachicola National Forest,
EG = Eglin Air Force Base, JC = Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center at
Ichauway, LF = Lafayette Forest Wildlife Environmental Area, SM = St. Marks National
Wildlife Refuge, OS = Orianne Society Preserve, WC = James W. Webb Wildlife
Center.
Figure 9
Mean relative abundance of bacterial families from the 50 most abundant taxa found on
the skin of P. ornata tadpoles collected from 10 ponds in 2017.
Ponds: AP = Apalachicola National Forest, EG = Eglin Air Force Base, JC = Joseph W.
Jones Ecological Research Center at Ichauway, LF = Lafayette Forest Wildlife
Environmental Area, SM = St. Marks National Wildlife Refuge, OS = Orianne Society
Preserve, WC = James W. Webb Wildlife Center. Sample names on x axis are individual
tadpole identifiers.
Figure 10
Ordination plot showing beta diversity (OTUs) of microbiota sampled from the skin of
P. ornata tadpoles collected from 10 ponds in 2017 based on the
Bray–Curtis method of NMDS. Colours represent Properties, and shapes represent Sites.
Each point represents a single individual.
Mean ± SE skin bacterial richness of P. ornata tadpoles and the
relationship with the dominant land cover type within 1000 m (Landcover1000) of each
pond.Shannon diversity of skin bacterial communities of P. ornata
tadpoles varied significantly with (a) percent canopy cover within 100 m of each pond
and (b) MEM2. Ponds: AP = Apalachicola National Forest, EG = Eglin Air Force Base,
JC = Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center at Ichauway, LF = Lafayette Forest
Wildlife Environmental Area, SM = St. Marks National Wildlife Refuge, OS = Orianne
Society Preserve, WC = James W. Webb Wildlife Center.Simpson diversity of skin bacterial communities of P. ornata
tadpoles varied significantly with MEM2. Ponds: AP = Apalachicola National Forest,
EG = Eglin Air Force Base, JC = Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center at
Ichauway, LF = Lafayette Forest Wildlife Environmental Area, SM = St. Marks National
Wildlife Refuge, OS = Orianne Society Preserve, WC = James W. Webb Wildlife
Center.Mean relative abundance of bacterial families from the 50 most abundant taxa found on
the skin of P. ornata tadpoles collected from 10 ponds in 2017.
Ponds: AP = Apalachicola National Forest, EG = Eglin Air Force Base, JC = Joseph W.
Jones Ecological Research Center at Ichauway, LF = Lafayette Forest Wildlife
Environmental Area, SM = St. Marks National Wildlife Refuge, OS = Orianne Society
Preserve, WC = James W. Webb Wildlife Center. Sample names on x axis are individual
tadpole identifiers.Ordination plot showing beta diversity (OTUs) of microbiota sampled from the skin of
P. ornata tadpoles collected from 10 ponds in 2017 based on the
Bray–Curtis method of NMDS. Colours represent Properties, and shapes represent Sites.
Each point represents a single individual.
Discussion
We found that both water quality and land cover characteristics were associated with
increased CORT release rates and altered skin bacterial communities among populations of
P. ornata. We found both baseline and agitationCORT profiles were linked
to pond water quality, as well as the amount of developed land within 1000 m of ponds. These
results indicate that environmental variation in two different settings—the aquatic and
surrounding terrestrial habitats—operate to influence the physiology (GCs) of larval
P. ornata. Similarly, pond water quality, land cover and spatial location
of ponds were significant predictors of mucosome function and skin bacterial diversity,
indicating environmental variation may affect larval P. ornata immune
defences through changes in bacterial communities, though we did not see significant effects
of these predictors directly on mucosome function. Therefore, perturbations and changes to
environmental conditions at multiple spatial scales may significantly impact population
health in this species. Given that some of these populations differed from year to year in
their CORT profile, the impact of environmental variation—along with the ability to recover
from stressor effects—likely varied over time, showing a need for continued monitoring
(Blaustein ). Taken
together, the effects of environmental variation on GC function and bacterial communities
across years suggests that persistent deviations from optimum conditions may affect
population health, thus setting the stage for population declines.Water quality variables and nearby urban development were important predictors of larval
ornate chorus frogCORT profiles. In 2016, both baseline and agitationCORT release rates
were higher in ponds with higher water temperature, conductivity and TDS, as shown by the
relationship with PC1 and PC2, whereas the percent urban development within 1000 m was
positively associated with CORT release rates in 2017. Additionally, agitationCORT
release rates in 2016 were higher at lower MEM3 values, indicating ponds closest to each
other were most similar and ponds at lower latitudes had higher CORT release rates,
probably from the warmer water temperatures at the southernmost site (LF1). Similarly,
studies involving salamanders also found elevated water-borne CORT release rates
associated with higher temperatures (Novarro ; Millikin ) and higher conductivity (Chambers, 2011); although, conductivity did not significantly affect CORT in
Rana sylvatica or Hyla versicolor tadpoles (Chambers, 2011). Both acute and chronic thermal
stressors are associated with increased urinary CORT in Rhinella marina,
the invasive cane toad (Narayan ; Narayan and Hero, 2014a and b). Elevated CORT can assist with energy mobilization
and metabolic increases associated with higher temperatures but may also indicate stress
(Chambers ; Narayan and Hero, 2014a and b; Novarro ; Millikin ). Several studies show increased developmental rate and body condition of
tadpoles in warmer water (Schiesari, 2006; Reading, 2010), though stress is generally associated
with lower body condition and reduced growth in amphibians (Glennemeier and Denver, 2002; Hu
; Denver,
2009; Janin ; Crespi and Warne, 2013).
Therefore, higher water temperatures may be an environmental stressor for this
winter-breeding amphibian, as warmer water temperatures may result in a shorter
hydroperiod, which is a known environmental stressor itself (Denver, 1998; Gomez-Mestre
). Our results suggest environmental variation in
water quality characteristics are important determinants of the CORT profiles of larval
P. ornata, potentially affecting their physiological health.Pond breeding frogs may be affected by habitat alterations at multiple scales due to
their use of both ponds, as larvae and to breed, and terrestrial habitats as adults. Janin found that body
condition was lower and urinary CORT metabolites were higher in adult
Bufo from ponds characterized by low forest availability and high
fragmentation within 500 m, suggesting surrounding habitat affects amphibian health. We
found that ponds with higher percentages of developed land within 1000 m were associated
with higher water-borne CORT release rates in 2017. Gabor found Jollyville Plateau salamanders
(Eurycea tonkawae) had higher water-borne CORT release rates in more
urbanized streams as indicated by greater percent impervious cover within the watershed.
We also found that CORT release rates were highest in tadpoles from a pond within
Lafayette Forest Wildlife Environmental Area (LF1), which had some of the warmest water
temperatures and was dominated by shrubby vegetation, a result of infrequent prescribed
fires. Of the properties sampled, this land was the most recently acquired and managed by
the state of Florida (purchased in 2008, management began in 2010) with the first
prescribed fires conducted in 2013 (N. Lambert, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission, pers. comm.). Prescribed fire is vital to management of longleaf pine uplands
and their embedded wetlands because it controls the growth of invasive, shrubby, mid-story
vegetation such as saw palmetto (Serenoa repens) and gallberry
(Ilex coriacea; Means, 2006;
Noss, 2013; Enge ; Noss,
2018). These results suggest habitat quality at a larger scale may affect the
CORT profile and subsequent physiological health of P. ornata tadpoles,
whether by directly affecting larval health, or indirectly via increased stress on
adults.Elevated CORT in response to an acute stressor is indicative of a healthy endocrine
response. Tadpoles that elevateCORT release in response to an acute agitation stressor
indicate the HPI axis is still active and not dysregulated due to chronic stress.
Therefore, the ability to mount a response to an acute stressor provides one component
that can indicate a healthy population. Comparing the average baseline and agitationCORT
release rates from each pond over both years showed four ponds in 2016 and six ponds in
2017 without a significant difference in their stress response (Fig. 5). The lack of a significant stress response in these
populations suggests that these ponds may be suffering from chronic stress (Romero, 2004; Cyr
and Romero, 2009). These populations may be able to recover if environmental
suitability increases and/or if individuals show compensatory growth once they leave the
pond and possibly find suitable habitat (Metcalfe and
Monaghan, 2001). When individuals return as adults to the pond to lay eggs, their
offspring may not show health effects if the water and environmental quality have
improved. However, stressful conditions during larval development may have negative
post-metamorphic carry-over effects on juvenile and adult frogs (Crespi and Warne, 2013). The populations that did not show a healthy
CORT response may fail to recover when exposed to consecutive years of low environmental
quality, or if the stressful conditions experienced during the larval stage have
carry-over effects in the adults. Populations of P. ornata in the
peninsular region of Florida are declining and undergoing local extirpations (Enge ). We were unable
to find P. ornata tadpoles (nor measure CORT) in this region, and it is
possible that these declines may be the consequence of an inability to recover from past
harsh environmental conditions (or repeated harsh conditions) such as the drought (and
associated warmer temperatures) experienced by this region from 2006 to 2008 and from 2010
to 2012 (Enge ).Even though our results indicate environmental variation at multiple spatial and
environmental scales (i.e. water quality vs. terrestrial habitat) impact the CORT profiles
of larval P. ornata, random effects in the models (as indicated by the
conditional R) accounted for some of the variation in CORT
release rates. This suggests additional variability between ponds within each property
associated with unmeasured factors. The difference between the marginal and conditional
R was greater in 2017, indicating more variation in the
CORT release rates between these sites was not accounted for by the predictors. This is
likely due to natural differences in pond characteristics (i.e. size, depth, hydroperiod)
and other habitat factors not examined. This variation contributes to the uncertainty that
enshrouds management decisions for P. ornata and ecologically similar
species. However, the consequences of development and water quality on the health of
P. ornata, indicated in this study, lends additional support for the
conservation and appropriate management of longleaf pine forests, including frequent
prescribed fire during the growing season, to maintain high-quality pine savannahs for
this and other longleaf pine endemic species (Means,
2006; Noss, 2013; Enge ; Noss, 2018).The amphibian mucosome, including both skin secretions and microbial communities, are
important factors in amphibian health and immunity. The ability of the mucosome to fight
infection has been used as a holistic measure of amphibian skin defences (Woodhams ). We found no
differences in the mean mucosome function across ponds, though the Bd
cell viability within a pond was quite variable. Additionally, there were no significant
predictors of mucosome function in our models, though water quality and landscape
variables were included in the top models. These results indicate no difference in the
bacterial and mucosal defences across ponds. In this study, mucosome function only reduced
Bd cell viability to 88.1%, indicating this species may be susceptible
to Bdinfection. Indeed, Gervasi
found that P. ornata had the
highest average Bdinfection load of 20 species studied and a high rate
of mortality following infection. Similarly, Horner
found P. ornata had a high
infection intensity and a high Bd prevalence across ponds. However, due
to logistics, we were unable to use the strain of Bd to which these frogs
are naturally exposed, which may be why we did not see any difference in mucosome function
across ponds. Woodhams ) found a significant correlation between mucosome function and both field
and laboratory Bdinfection prevalence for Swiss and European frogs (for
a Swiss Bd strain); thus, future studies could repeat exposure
experiments using local isolates.Alpha and beta skin bacterial diversity varied across both Sites and Properties. Primary
predictors of bacterial diversity at each pond were the dominant land cover type within
1000 m, the percent developed land within 500 m, the percent canopy cover within 100 m and
the spatial location of ponds. All alpha diversity indices were highest at sites located
within the Jones Center property, and these wetlands were the largest sampled and
surrounded by mature longleaf pine forest with short-interval prescribed fires to maintain
high-quality pine savannah. Even though a site in Apalachicola National Forest (AP2) had
the lowest observed Richness, both Shannon and Simpson diversity indices were lowest
within the Eglin Air Force Base (EG) property. The ponds sampled at Eglin were along a
powerline right-of-way and thus were composed of more disturbed habitat. Variation in skin
bacterial communities are generally associated with pond characteristics including
conductivity, pH, temperature, dissolved oxygen and precipitation (Kueneman ; Krynak , 2016; Varela ). The significant association of bacterial diversity with
land cover suggests landscape-scale features also affect bacterial communities. Bacterial
richness, the number of species present, was positively associated with ponds surrounded
by forest. Interestingly, Shannon diversity, a measure of the abundance and variety of
bacteria present, was higher in ponds with more developed land within 500 m and with less
canopy cover within 100 m. Enge found that most wetlands inhabited by P. ornata lacked a
canopy or had an open canopy that allowed growth of grasses during dry down periods, a
result of short-interval fire management. Our results suggest these open canopy ponds with
greater environmental variation may have higher bacterial diversity.In southeastern USA, land-use conversion, fire suppression and droughts are important
factors in the decline of amphibian species, especially those reliant on the savannah-like
longleaf pine-wiregrass (P. palustris-Aristida spp.) ecosystem. In
addition to its control of invasive shrubs and hardwoods, summer growing-season fire, when
ponds are typically dry, is required to maintain grasses and sedges in ephemeral wetlands
used by those pond-breeding amphibians that are endemic to this ecosystem (Noss, 2013, 2018). Within the pine savannahs of the southeastern Coastal Plain, a
short-interval fire regime maintains herbaceous vegetation, reduces canopy cover in
breeding ponds and increases amphibian abundance and diversity (Noss, 2013, 2018). Our
findings that landcover type, the percent developed land and increased canopy cover were
associated with altered skin bacterial diversity indicate environmental variation may also
contribute to changes in skin bacterial diversity of larval P. ornata.
These effects may ultimately impact the immune defences of species like P.
ornata that are specialists of the longleaf pine ecosystem.The sole significant predictor of Simpson diversity, and an additional significant
predictor of Shannon diversity, was the spatial MEM axis MEM2 (scaled longitude). The
eigenvalue for this axis was −0.78, indicating autocorrelation among sites at a fine
spatial scale. This autocorrelation indicates both Shannon and Simpson diversities are
most similar in nearby ponds, which is expected, and that longitude had an effect on the
diversity observed. Our results suggest ponds sampled in the western portion of the range
had lower Shannon and Simpson bacterial diversity than ponds sampled in the eastern
portion of the range. The more similar diversity among ponds in close proximity to one
another is also suggested in the results of our distance-based ordination plot of
bacterial diversity (Fig. 10). However, the pairwise
comparison of beta diversity between sites showed that all comparisons between sites
except two showed significant differences (Table S8) and all comparisons between
properties were significantly different except for those that were geographically the
closest (Apalachicola National Forest and St. Marks National Wildlife Refuge; Table S9). As we have seen,
environmental characteristics can influence bacterial diversity. Additionally, maintaining
high-quality ponds and wetlands across a species range can aid in establishing a higher
bacterial diversity. Together, these results suggest site location and landscape
characteristics around ponds play an important role in the skin bacterial community
composition, which can affect immune defences, ultimately influencing the health of these
larval amphibians.Though bacterial communities are known to vary across sites and even among species within
the same site (see Belden ), some bacterial families have high proportions of Bd
inhibitory isolates. Bletz examined skin bacteria from Madagascar amphibians and found three
families with 75% or more of the isolates having inhibitory effects on Bdinfection, suggesting these may be good candidates for broad probiotic treatment. These
three families (Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonadaceae and Xanthamonadaceae) were also well
represented in our site diversity; although, P. ornata have high
Bd prevalence (Gervasi ) and the mucosome function in our study only reduced
Bd cell viability to ~88% (see Mucosome function under Results above),
suggesting other factors may be contributing to the infection of this species. Continued
research should consider the skin bacterial community to aid in developing probiotics to
fight known pathogens such as B. dendrobatidis and B.
salamandrivorans (Woodhams ).
Conclusions
Amphibian populations have been declining rapidly worldwide, and this decline is likely
tied to their need for multiple habitats and their susceptibility to environmental changes
(Stuart ; Becker ). There is a
growing need to monitor population health and factors that influence their health to provide
early warning signs for proactive management decisions. Our results suggest the conservation
of P. ornata could be enhanced by management actions that address water
quality and forest composition to maintain high-quality aquatic and terrestrial habitat.
Natural resource managers could consider habitat quality at multiple spatial scales to best
manage larval amphibian populations and the bacterial communities present. By examining
baseline and stress (agitation) induced CORT profiles and other health metrics across
locations and for several years in succession, researchers and managers may be able to use
this method proactively to identify populations at increased risk of declines to focus
management efforts. Additionally, little is known about the adult life history of this
cryptic and fossorial species (Brown and Means,
1984; Bartlett and Bartlett, 2011),
warranting additional research and implementing management practices that maintain suitable
habitat for both aquatic and terrestrial life stages, as landscape-level factors may have
impacts in aquatic larvae directly, as well as indirectly by affecting adults. By examining
environmental variables, the CORT profiles and skin bacterial communities of populations of
P. ornata across the range of the species, we identified factors at
multiple spatial scales that affect population health. Though some populations showed an
ability to mount a CORT response in different years, without habitat remediation, other
populations may no longer be able to recover from changes in environmental conditions.
Funding
This work was supported by a cooperative agreement between the U.S. Geological Survey and
Texas State University (G15AC00457 to C.R.G. and S.C.W.) and start-up funds from Texas State
University to D.R.Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Louise A Rollins-Smith; Jeremy P Ramsey; James D Pask; Laura K Reinert; Douglas C Woodhams Journal: Integr Comp Biol Date: 2011-08-03 Impact factor: 3.326
Authors: Zachery R Forsburg; Cory B Goff; Hannah R Perkins; Joseph A Robicheaux; Grayson F Almond; Caitlin R Gabor Journal: Gen Comp Endocrinol Date: 2019-06-11 Impact factor: 2.822