Literature DB >> 32577170

Characterizing permafrost active layer dynamics and sensitivity to landscape spatial heterogeneity in Alaska.

Yonghong Yi1, John S Kimball1, Richard H Chen2, Mahta Moghaddam2, Rolf H Reichle3, Umakant Mishra4, Donatella Zona5, Walter C Oechel5.   

Abstract

An important feature of the Arctic is large spatial heterogeneity in active layer conditions, which is generally poorly represented by global models and can lead to large uncertainties in predicting regional ecosystem responses and climate feedbacks. In this study, we developed a spatially integrated modelling and analysis framework combining field observations, local scale (~ 50 m resolution) active layer thickness (ALT) and soil moisture maps derived from airborne low frequency (L+P-band) radar measurements, and global satellite environmental observations to investigate the ALT sensitivity to recent climate trends and landscape heterogeneity in Alaska. Modelled ALT results show good correspondence with in situ measurements in higher permafrost probability (PP ≥ 70%) areas (n = 33, R = 0.60, mean bias = 1.58 cm, RMSE = 20.32 cm), but with larger uncertainty in sporadic and discontinuous permafrost areas. The model results also reveal widespread ALT deepening since 2001, with smaller ALT increases in northern Alaska (mean trend = 0.32 ± 1.18 cm yr-1) and much larger increases (> 3 cm yr-1) across interior and southern Alaska. The positive ALT trend coincides with regional warming and a longer snow-free season (R = 0.60 ± 0.32). A spatially integrated analysis of the radar retrievals and model sensitivity simulations demonstrated that uncertainty in the spatial and vertical distribution of soil organic carbon (SOC) was the largest factor affecting modeled ALT accuracy, while soil moisture played a secondary role. Potential improvements in characterizing SOC heterogeneity, including better spatial sampling of soil conditions and advances in remote sensing of SOC and soil moisture, will enable more accurate predictions of active layer conditions and refinement of the modelling framework across a larger domain.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 32577170      PMCID: PMC7309651          DOI: 10.5194/tc-12-145-2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cryosphere        ISSN: 1994-0416            Impact factor:   5.771


  4 in total

Review 1.  Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback.

Authors:  E A G Schuur; A D McGuire; C Schädel; G Grosse; J W Harden; D J Hayes; G Hugelius; C D Koven; P Kuhry; D M Lawrence; S M Natali; D Olefeldt; V E Romanovsky; K Schaefer; M R Turetsky; C C Treat; J E Vonk
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Disappearing Arctic lakes.

Authors:  L C Smith; Y Sheng; G M MacDonald; L D Hinzman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-06-03       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Global Assessment of the SMAP Level-4 Surface and Root-Zone Soil Moisture Product Using Assimilation Diagnostics.

Authors:  Rolf H Reichle; Gabrielle J M De Lannoy; Qing Liu; Randal D Koster; John S Kimball; Wade T Crow; Joseph V Ardizzone; Purnendu Chakraborty; Douglas W Collins; Austin L Conaty; Manuela Girotto; Lucas A Jones; Jana Kolassa; Hans Lievens; Robert A Lucchesi; Edmond B Smith
Journal:  J Hydrometeorol       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 4.349

4.  The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2).

Authors:  Ronald Gelaro; Will McCarty; Max J Suárez; Ricardo Todling; Andrea Molod; Lawrence Takacs; Cynthia Randles; Anton Darmenov; Michael G Bosilovich; Rolf Reichle; Krzysztof Wargan; Lawrence Coy; Richard Cullather; Clara Draper; Santha Akella; Virginie Buchard; Austin Conaty; Arlindo da Silva; Wei Gu; Gi-Kong Kim; Randal Koster; Robert Lucchesi; Dagmar Merkova; Jon Eric Nielsen; Gary Partyka; Steven Pawson; William Putman; Michele Rienecker; Siegfried D Schubert; Meta Sienkiewicz; Bin Zhao
Journal:  J Clim       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 5.148

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.