Literature DB >> 3257602

Quantification of regional myocardial function by rapid cine MR imaging.

P W Pflugfelder1, U P Sechtem, R D White, C B Higgins.   

Abstract

The capability of rapid (cine) MR imaging to quantitate left ventricular function was assessed in 13 normal subjects and in 15 patients with ischemic heart disease and regional wall-motion abnormalities proved by echocardiography and/or by contrast ventriculography. Fifteen to 20 MR images/cardiac cycle were acquired by using partial flip angles, short repetition times, and gradient-refocused echoes. Regional wall motion was assessed qualitatively in the equatorial left ventricular section by using the cine display and quantitatively by measuring myocardial thickness at end-diastole and at end-systole in six left ventricular segments in this plane. In normal volunteers wall motion was normal in all segments. Heterogeneity of systolic wall thickening was observed in normal subjects, ranging from 33% +/- 17% in the posteroseptal segment to 66% +/- 29% in the posterior segment. Overall systolic wall thickening was 48% +/- 28%. From the cinematic display of MR images, abnormal wall motion was observed in 40 of 90 segments in patients with ischemic heart disease, which correlated well with results of echocardiography or contrast ventriculography. Twenty-one segments were hypokinetic, 15 were akinetic, and four were dyskinetic. In patients with ischemic heart disease, percentage systolic wall thickening was 43% +/- 31% in the segments with normal wall motion, 6% +/- 18% in hypokinetic segments, -4% +/- 24% in akinetic segments, and -13% +/- 25% in dyskinetic zones. Absolute systolic wall thickening was less than 2 mm in 31 of 40 abnormal segments and was greater than 2 mm in only three. Rapid acquisition, improved temporal resolution, and the capacity for cine display make this new MR technique potentially useful not only for qualitative assessment of cardiac wall motion, but also for quantification of regional myocardial function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3257602     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.150.3.523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  8 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging vs. ultrafast computed tomography for cardiac diagnosis.

Authors:  R M MacMillan
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1992

2.  Noninvasive blood flow measurement and quantification of shunt volume by cine magnetic resonance in congenital heart disease. Preliminary results.

Authors:  L Sieverding; W I Jung; U Klose; J Apitz
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1992

3.  Value of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with a recent myocardial infarction: comparison with planar thallium-201 scintigraphy.

Authors:  X H Krauss; E E Van der Wall; J Doornbos; J A Blokland; S Postema; A de Roos; A Van der Laarse; V M Cats; A E Van Voorthuisen; A V Bruschke
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 4.  Assessment of residual viability in patients with myocardial infarction using magnetic resonance techniques.

Authors:  U Sechtem; E Voth; F Baer; C Schneider; P Theissen; H Schicha
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1993

5.  Identification of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenoses by dipyridamole-magnetic resonance imaging and 99mTc-methoxyisobutyl-isonitrile-SPECT.

Authors:  F M Baer; K Smolarz; P Theissen; E Voth; H Schicha; U Sechtem
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1993-06

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance imaging of acquired cardiac disease.

Authors:  C L Carrol; C B Higgins; G R Caputo
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1996

Review 7.  Single photon emission computed tomography: an alternative imaging modality in left ventricular evaluation.

Authors:  Hulya Yalçin; Sofiane Maza; Fatih Yalçin
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2008

8.  Sensitivity analysis of a strongly-coupled human-based electromechanical cardiac model: Effect of mechanical parameters on physiologically relevant biomarkers.

Authors:  F Levrero-Florencio; F Margara; E Zacur; A Bueno-Orovio; Z J Wang; A Santiago; J Aguado-Sierra; G Houzeaux; V Grau; D Kay; M Vázquez; R Ruiz-Baier; B Rodriguez
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 6.756

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.