| Literature DB >> 32575851 |
Yves Lecarpentier1, Vincent Kindler2, Xénophon Krokidis1, Marie-Luce Bochaton-Piallat3, Victor Claes4, Jean-Louis Hébert5, Alexandre Vallée6, Olivier Schussler7,8.
Abstract
Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) were obtained from human bone marrow and amplified in cultures supplemented with human platelet lysate. Once semi-confluent, cells were seeded in solid collagen scaffolds that were rapidly colonized by the cells generating a 3D cell scaffold. Here, they acquired a myofibroblast phenotype and when exposed to appropriate chemical stimulus, developed tension and cell shortening, similar to those of striated and smooth muscle cells. Myofibroblasts contained a molecular motor-the non-muscle myosin type IIA (NMMIIA) whose crossbridge (CB) kinetics are dramatically slow compared with striated and smooth muscle myosins. Huxley's equations were used to determine the molecular mechanical properties of NMMIIA. Thank to the great number of NMMIIA molecules, we determined the statistical mechanics (SM) of MSCs, using the grand canonical ensemble which made it possible to calculate various thermodynamic entities such as the chemical affinity, statistical entropy, internal energy, thermodynamic flow, thermodynamic force, and entropy production rate. The linear relationship observed between the thermodynamic force and the thermodynamic flow allowed to establish that MSC-laden in collagen scaffolds were in a near-equilibrium stationary state (affinity ≪ RT), MSCs were also seeded in solid collagen scaffolds functionalized with the tripeptide Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD). This induced major changes in NMMIIA SM particularly by increasing the rate of entropy production. In conclusion, collagen scaffolds laden with MSCs can be viewed as a non-muscle contractile bioengineered tissue operating in a near-equilibrium linear regime, whose SM could be substantially modified by the RGD peptide.Entities:
Keywords: RGD; bone marrow; chemical affinity; collagen scaffold; entropy production rate; linear stationary state; mesenchymal stromal cell; myofibroblast; near-equilibrium thermodynamics; non-muscle myosin NMMIIA; statistical mechanics; thermodynamic flow; thermodynamic force; tissue engineering
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32575851 PMCID: PMC7349514 DOI: 10.3390/cells9061510
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 6.600
Figure 1NMMIIA-CB cycle in myofibroblast. The cycle of the non-muscle NMMIIA is composed of six successive conformational steps. Three steps are detached (D1, D2, and D3) and three steps are attached (A1, A2, and A3). (1°) Transition A3 → D1. The ATP binding step induces myosin (M) detachment from actin (A) after ATP binding with the AM complex. The rate constant of CB detachment is g2. AM + ATP → A + M-ATP; (2°) Transition D1 → D2: ATP hydrolysis M + ATP → M-ADP-Pi. (3°) Transition D2 → D3 corresponds to M-ADP-Pi → M*-ADP-Pi; (4°) Transition D3 → A1 corresponds to the attachment state: M*-ADP-Pi binds with A and the attachment rate constant is f1: M*-ADP-Pi + A → AM-ADP-Pi; (5°) Transition A1 → A2 corresponds to the power stroke that is triggered by the release of Pi: AM-ADP-Pi → AM-ADP + Pi. The power stroke generates a single CB force and a myosin.
Figure 2Parameters of statistical mechanics. (A): the microcanonical partition function (z) was significantly greater in COL-RGD-MSC scaffolds (red) than in COL-MSC scaffolds (blue); (B): the grand potential was significantly greater in COL-MSC-RDG scaffolds than in COL-MSC scaffolds; (C): there was a linear relationship between (TS-E) and the thermodynamic flow. When the thermodynamic flow tends towards zero, the chemical affinity tends towards zero and (TS-E) represents the value of the grand potential; y = 295 + 200 x, r = 0.84 in COL-MSC scaffolds; y = 620 + 45 x, r = 0.95 in COL-MSC-RGD scaffolds.
Classical mechanical parameters of COL-MSC and COL-MSC-RGD scaffolds and molecular properties of NMMIIA CBs.
| COL-MSC | COL-MSC-RGD |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tension (TT) | 0.266 ± 0.103 | 0.642 ± 0.212 | 0.0001 |
| max SL | 0.012 ± 0.008 | 0.020 ± 0.014 | 0.020 |
| Vmax | 0.002 ± 0.001 | 0.004 ± 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Eff. max | 38 ± 3 | 38 ± 3 | 0.857; NS |
| CB force (po) | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 2.1 ± 0.1 | 0.865; NS |
| CB mole/L | 4.23 ± 1.55 | 10.27 ± 30 | 0.0001 |
| CB number/L | 2.55 ± 0.90 | 6.18 ± 1.99 | 0.0001 |
Figure 3Parameters of statistical mechanics. (A): Thermodynamic force; (B): Thermodynamic flow; (C): Entropy production rate. These three parameters were significantly greater in COL-MSC-RDG scaffolds (red) than in COL-MSC scaffolds (blue); (D): There was a linear relationship between the thermodynamic force and the thermodynamic flow showing that both the 2 types of contractile scaffolds behaved in a stationary mode; y = −5 + 68 x; r = 0.84 in COL-MSC scaffolds; y = 48 + 15 x in COL-MSC scaffolds.
Probabilities of the 6 steps of the NMMIIA CB cycle.
| COL-MSC | COL-MSC-RGD |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| PD1 | 0.008 ± 0.006 | 0.009 ± 0.005 | 0.618; NS |
| PD2 | 0.082 ± 0.056 | 0.094 ± 0.053 | 0.618; NS |
| PD3 | 0.825 ± 0.068 | 0.813 ± 0.062 | 0.658; NS |
| PA1 | 0.037 ± 0.011 | 0.036 ± 0.010 | 0.865; NS |
| PA2 | 0.041 ± 0.003 | 0.042 ± 0.003 | 0.865; NS |
| PA3. E-11 | 1.794 ± 0.147 | 1.766 ± 0.134 | 0.653; NS |
Figure 4Parameters of statistical mechanics. (A): Chemical affinity; (B): Internal energy; (C): statistical entropy. These three parameters were significantly greater in COL-MSC-RDG scaffolds (red) than in COL-MSC scaffolds (blue); (D): Statistical entropy derivative according to probability PD3 (dS/dPD3) was significantly smaller in COL-MSC-RDG scaffolds than in COL-MSC scaffolds.
Figure 5Parameters of statistical mechanics. (A): Non-linear relationship between the entropy production rate and the thermodynamic force. Influence of the thermodynamic force was moderately greater in COL-MSC-RDG (red) scaffolds than in COL-MSC scaffolds (blue); (B): Linear relationship between the entropy production rate and the thermodynamic flow; y = −212 + 216 * x; r = 0.97. Influence of the thermodynamic flow was significantly greater in COL-MSC-RDG scaffolds than in COL-MSC scaffolds; (C): Linear relationships between the thermodynamic force and the statistical entropy derivative according to probability PD3 (dS/dPD3); y = 7.3 + x; r = 1 in COL-MSC scaffolds; y = 6.2 + x; r = 1 in COL-MSC-RDG scaffolds. (D): Linear relationship between the thermodynamic force and the CB force: y = 990 − 4.4 x; r = 0.99 in COL-MSC scaffolds and y = 900 − 3.7 x; r = 0.87 in COL-MSC-RDG scaffolds.