| Literature DB >> 32575710 |
Sarah Todeschini1,2,3, Véronique Perreault1,2,3, Charles Goulet4, Mélanie Bouchard5, Pascal Dubé5, Yvan Boutin3,6, Laurent Bazinet1,2,3.
Abstract
Herring milt hydrolysate (HMH), like many fish products, presents the drawback to be associated with off-flavors. As odor is an important criterion, an effective deodorization method targeting the volatile compounds responsible for off-flavors needs to be developed. The potential of electrodialysis (ED) to remove the 15 volatile compounds identified, in the first part of this work, for their main contribution to the odor of HMH, as well as trimethylamine, dimethylamine and trimethylamine oxide, was assessed by testing the impact of both hydrolysate pH (4 and 7) and current conditions (no current vs. current applied). The ED performance was compared with that of a deaerator by assessing three hydrolysate pH values (4, 7 and 10). The initial pH of HMH had a huge impact on the targeted compounds, while ED had no effect. The fouling formation, resulting from electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions between HMH constituents and ion-exchange membranes (IEM); the occurrence of water dissociation on IEM interfaces, due to the reaching of the limiting current density; and the presence of water dissociation catalyzers were considered as the major limiting process conditions. The deaerator treatment on hydrolysate at pH 7 and its alkalization until pH 10 led to the best removal of odorant compounds.Entities:
Keywords: deaerator; deodorization; electrodialysis; fouling; herring milt hydrolysate; off-flavors; trimethylamine; water dissociation
Year: 2020 PMID: 32575710 DOI: 10.3390/membranes10060127
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Membranes (Basel) ISSN: 2077-0375