| Literature DB >> 32575578 |
Thi Hoa Le1, Hyun Jong Lee1, Ji Hyeon Kim1, Sang Joon Park1.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: bi-sensor; co-doped carbon dots; improved quantum yield; off-on fluorescence detector
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32575578 PMCID: PMC7349486 DOI: 10.3390/s20123470
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Scheme 1Illustration of NPCDs bi-sensor detecting Fe3+ and CNs based on the “off-on”mechanism.
Figure 1(A) Excitation (a1, a2) and emission (b1, b2) fluorescence spectra of the CDs and NPCDs (inset: enlarge fluorescence spectrum of CDs), (B) fluorescence spectra of the NPCDs in the range of excitation wavelength from 280 to 390 nm.
Comparison of QY of co-doped CDs synthesized using different methods.
| Doped Carbon Dots | Material | Method | Quantum Yield | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N,P-CDs | Citric acid, O-phosphorylethanolamine | Hydrothermal | 8.17% | [ |
| N,P-CDs | Ethylenediamine, H3PO4 | Hydrothermal | 25.47% | [ |
| N,P-CDs | Sodium citrate, (NH4)2HPO4 | Hydrothermal | 53.8% | [ |
| N,P-CDs | Glucose, ammonia, H3PO4 | Hydrothermal | 54% | [ |
| N,P-CDs | Citric acid, (NH4)2HPO4 | Hydrothermal | 84% | Our method |
| P,Cl-CDs | Maltose, H3PO4, HCl | Hydrothermal | 15% | [ |
| Si,N-CDs | Ethylenediamine, APTES | Hydrothermal | 29.7% | [ |
| S,N-CDs | Citric acid, N-acetyl-L-Cysteine | Hydrothermal | 49% | [ |
| S,N-CDs | Sodium citrate, sulfamide | Hydrothermal | 55% | [ |
| S,N-CDs | Citric acid, L-Cysteine | Hydrothermal | 73% | [ |
Figure 2TEM images of NPCDs (inset (A) size distribution (B) HRTEM image of NPCDs).
Figure 3(A) XPS survey spectra of NPCDs. High-resolution XPS spectra of (B) C1s, (C) N1s, and (D) P2p, respectively.
Figure 4FTIR spectra of CDs and NPCDs.
Figure 5(A) Fluorescence intensity of NPCDs and (B) quenching effect of Fe3+ on the fluorescence of NPCDs in a variety of pH values.
Figure 6(A) Fluorescence spectra of NPCDs in the presence of different concentrations of Fe3+ and (B) the linear relationship between I/INPCDs and the concentration of Fe3+.
Comparison of different fluorescence probes for Fe3+ detection.
| Materials | Linear Range (µM) | LOD (µM) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CDs | 0−6.0 | 0.4 | [ |
| CDs | 0−20 | 0.32 | [ |
| CDs | 0−30 | 0.015 | [ |
| N-CDs | 0−500 | 0.15 | [ |
| N,S-CDs | 6−200 | 0.8 | [ |
| P,Cl-CDs | 0.1−8.0 | 0.06 | [ |
| N,P-CDs | 0−40 | 0.2 | Our work |
Figure 7(A) Fluorescence intensity of the NPCDs/Fe3+ probe in the existence of various CNs at the same concentration of 5 µM, (B) time-dependence of fluorescence ratio (IProbe+DA/IProbe) in the presence of 5 µM DA.
Figure 8(A) Enhancement effect of DA on fluorescence intensity of NPCDs/Fe3+ probe (inset: calibration curve between IProbe+DA/IProbe and concentration of DA), (B) selectivity of NPCDs/Fe3+ probe towards different interferences in the presence and absence of DA in an equal concentration of 5 µM.
Scheme 2“Off-on” mechanism of Fe3+ and CNs on NPCDs fluorescence.