| Literature DB >> 32575479 |
Agnieszka Gunia-Krzyżak1, Ewa Żesławska2, Karolina Słoczyńska3, Dorota Żelaszczyk1, Aleksandra Sowa3, Paulina Koczurkiewicz-Adamczyk3, Justyna Popiół3, Wojciech Nitek4, Elżbieta Pękala3, Henryk Marona1.
Abstract
Epilepsy is one of the most frequentEntities:
Keywords: anticonvulsant; antiseizure, cinnamamide derivatives; crystallography; drug development; epilepsy; preclinical safety evaluation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32575479 PMCID: PMC7352759 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21124372
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Structures of previously reported cinnamamide derivatives with anticonvulsant activity: (a) R,S-(2E)-N-(2-hydroxypropyl)-3-phenylprop-2-enamide [19], (b) S-(2E)-N-(1-hydroxypropan-2-yl)-3-(2-methylphenyl)prop-2-enamide [21,22], (c) R,S-(2E)-3-(4-chlorophenyl)-N-(2-hydroxypropyl)prop-2-enamide [21,22], (d) R,S-(2E)-1-(3-hydroxypiperidin-1-yl)-3-phenylprop-2-en-1-one [17].
Figure 2The structure of the title compound: S(+)-(2E)-N-(2-hydroxypropyl)-3-phenylprop-2-enamide, KM-568.
Figure 3Synthesis of compound KM-568.
Figure 4The molecular structure of molecule A showing the atom numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.
Figure 5The overlap of amide groups of eight molecules: A yellow, B orange, C red, D light green, E green, F light blue, G blue and H violet.
Figure 6Partial packing view of KM-568 molecules projected along [010] direction. Dashed lines indicate hydrogen bonds.
Biological response in anticonvulsant and neurotoxicity evaluation in mice after intraperitoneal (i.p.) and oral (p.o.) administration of KM-568.
| Mice, | Mice, | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test | KM-568 (mg/kg) | Results a | ED50/TD50 (mg/kg) b | KM-568 (mg/kg) | Results a | ED50/TD50 (mg/kg) b |
| MES | 25 | 0/8 | 44.46 (42.50–47.93) | 50 | 0/8 | 86.6 (74.48–102.11) |
| 38 | 1/8 | 60 | 2/8 | |||
| 41 | 0/8 | 70 | 2/8 | |||
| 42 | 2/8 | 90 | 3/8 | |||
| 44 | 5/8 | 120 | 7/8 | |||
| 50 | 7/8 | 150 | 8/8 | |||
| 70 | 2/8 | 104.29 (74.63–130.51) | 50 | 1/8 | 107.27 (68.07–148.03) | |
| 100 | 3/8 | 100 | 4/8 | |||
| 138 | 5/8 | 150 | 4/8 | |||
| 170 | 8/8 | 200 | 8/8 | |||
| 6-Hz (32 mA) | 50 | 1/8 | 71.55 (57.99–81.87) | |||
| 75 | 3/8 | |||||
| 87 | 7/8 | |||||
| 110 | 8/8 | |||||
| 6-Hz (44 mA) | 50 | 0/8 | 114.4 (81.75–138.57) | |||
| 100 | 3/8 | |||||
| 150 | 6/8 | |||||
| 200 | 8/8 | |||||
| Bicuculine | 130 | 0/8 | >130 | |||
| Picrotoxin | 70 | 1/8 | 94.11 (73.85–113.62) | |||
| 100 | 5/8 | |||||
| 130 | 7/8 | |||||
| TOX | 100 | 0/8 | 148.47 (140.08–158.84) | 200 | 0/8 | 344.14 (286.55–400.89) |
| 125 | 0/8 | 300 | 3/8 | |||
| 138 | 2/8 | 350 | 5/8 | |||
| 150 | 5/8 | 400 | 5/8 | |||
| 170 | 7/8 | 500 | 7/8 | |||
| 200 | 8/8 | |||||
a Results presented as number of protected/tested animals in seizure models or number of animals displaying neurotoxicity/number of animals used in neurotoxicity assessment; b Calculated ED50 or TD50 value with 95% confidence interval in parentheses; the compound KM-568 was tested 0.25 h after administration (for 6-Hz 44 mA (i.p.), MES (p.o.) and scMET (p.o.) the time was 0.5 h).
Biological response in anticonvulsant and neurotoxicity evaluation in rats after intraperitoneal (i.p.) and oral (p.o.) administration of KM-568.
| Rats, | Rats, | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test | KM-568 (mg/kg) | Results a | ED50 or TD50 (mg/kg) b | KM-568 (mg/kg) | Results a | ED50 or TD50 (mg/kg) b |
| MES | 15 | 1/8 | 27.58 (18.84–41.74) | 20.0 | 1/8 | 30.81 (24.16–37.13) |
| 22 | 3/8 | 30.0 | 3/8 | |||
| 30 | 5/8 | 35.0 | 5/8 | |||
| 60 | 7/8 | 40.0 | 7/8 | |||
| 30 | 1/8 | 41.72 (33.54–49.37) | 62.5 | >250 | ||
| 45 | 4/8 | 125.0 | ||||
| 60 | 8/8 | 250.0 | ||||
| 95 | 8/8 | |||||
| TOX | 60 | 0/8 | 95.21 (79.8–110.42) | 125.0 | 0/2 | >500 |
| 80 | 0/8 | 250.0 | 0/2 | |||
| 100 | 2/8 | 500.0 | 0/2 | |||
| 120 | 5/8 | |||||
| 140 | 7/8 | |||||
a Results presented as number of protected/tested animals in seizure models or number of animals displaying neurotoxicity/number of animals used in neurotoxicity assessment; b Calculated ED50 or TD50 value with 95% confidence interval in parentheses; the compound KM-568 was tested 0.25 h after administration for MES and scMET (i.p.), 0.5 h for TOX (i.p.), 1.0 h for MES, scMET and TOX (p.o.).
Results of tests performed in Frings mice after 0.25 h of intraperitoneal administration of compound KM-568.
| KM-568 (mg/kg) | Results a | ED50 (mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|
| 10.0 | 1/8 | 13.21 (11.22–15.11) |
| 12.5 | 3/8 | |
| 15.0 | 6/8 | |
| 17.5 | 7/8 |
a Results presented as number of protected/tested animals.
Results of intravenous metrazol seizure threshold (ivMET) test in mice performed after 0.25 h of i.p. administration of tested compound. Results are presented as mean ± SEM for ten animals for each dose.
| KM-568 (mg/kg) | Time to twitch (sec) | Twitch * (mg/kg) | Time to clonus (sec) | Clonus * (mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 26.1 ± 1.7 | 26.8 ± 1.5 | 28.7 ± 1.8 | 29.6 ± 1.6 |
| 44 | 35.8 ± 1.5 | 37.8 ± 1.4 | 48.2 ± 3.5 | 50.8 ± 3.5 |
| 148 | 57.9 ± 1.6 | 61.3 ± 2.2 | 75.9 ± 2.9 | 80.2 ± 3.2 |
* Calculated metrazol dose causing first twitch and clonus.
Results of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy model (MTLE) for KM-568 tested at 114 mg/kg (i.p.).
| Recording Period | HPD * Counts | Mean HPD Counts | SEM | Effect (% of Baseline) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 16; 18; 21; 14 | 17.3 | 1.49 | - |
| 20–40 min | 14; 8; 17; 12 | 12.8 | 1.89 | 73.9 |
* HPD - hippocampal paroxysmal discharges.
Results of cornel kindling in mice after 0.5 h of i.p. administration of KM-568.
| KM-568 (mg/kg) | Results a | Individual Seizure Score b | Average Seizure Score | ED50 (mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57 | 1/8 | 4,5,5,0,4,5,4,5 | 4.0 | 79.17 (60.34–98.26) |
| 84 | 5/8 | 4,5,3,3,3,3,3,5 | 3.625 | |
| 115 | 7/8 | 0,0,0,4,0,0,0,1 | 0.625 |
a Results presented as number of protected/tested animals, b according to the Racine scale.
Results of a hippocampal kindled rat model after intraperitoneal administration of compound KM-568.
| KM-568 (mg/kg) | Time (min) | Results a | Seizure Score b ± SEM | Seizure Duration (sec) ± SEM | ED50 (mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 | 0 | 5.0 ± 0.0 | 66.83 ± 10.77 | 24.21 (19.4–26.54) | |
| 15 | 2/6 | 3.67 ± 0.84 | 55.67 ± 6.44 | ||
| 45 | 5.0 ± 0.0 | 65.83 ± 14.61 | |||
| 75 | 5.0 ± 0.0 | 56.67 ± 6.96 | |||
| 100 | 5.0 ± 0.0 | 57.83 ± 9.27 | |||
| 135 | 5.0 ± 0.0 | 55.17 ± 9.48 | |||
| 27 | 0 | 5.0 ± 0.0 | 56.20 ± 7.70 | ||
| 15 | 4/5 | 1.8 ± 0.97 * | 50.4 ± 3.08 | ||
| 45 | 4.2 ± 0.80 | 80.0 ± 9.42 * | |||
| 75 | 3.4 ± 0.98 | 70.6 ± 27.57 | |||
| 100 | 5.0 ± 0.0 | 62.5 ± 10.71 | |||
| 135 | 5.0 ± 0.0 | 95.0 ± 17.78 * |
a Results presented as number protected/tested animals, b The mean value for five or six mice, the seizure score expressed in Racine scale, * data significantly different from control.
Results of lamotrigine-resistant amygdala kindled rat model after 0.25 h of intraperitoneal administration of compound KM-568.
| KM-568 | Time of Test (h) | Seizure Score ± SEM | Seizure Duration (sec) ± SD | Results a | ED50 (mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| control | 0.0 | 5.0 ± 0.0 | 156.43 ± 7.31 | 0/7 | 58.69 (38.09–120.15) |
| 20 | 0.25 | 5.0 ± 0.0 | 140 ± 17.55 | 0/7 | |
| control | 0.0 | 5.0 ± 0.0 | 118.86 ± 13.87 | 0/7 | |
| 40 | 0.25 | 3.86 ± 0.74 | 94.71 ± 8.72 | 2/7 | |
| control | 0.0 | 5.0 ± 0.0 | 86.71 ± 9.68 | 0/7 | |
| 80 | 0.25 | 2.86 ± 0.63 * | 56.57 ± 12.34 | 5/7 |
a Results presented as number of protected/tested animals, protection defined as Racine score <3. * data significantly different from control.
Results of pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus model in rats (compound KM-568 was administered i.p.).
| Time (h) | KM-568 (mg/kg) | Results a | ED50 (mg/kg) | ED97 (mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 200 | 8/8 | ||
| 0.5 | 200 | 1/8 | 279.45 (212.61–344.62) | 498.2 (378.3–1526.9) |
| 300 | 5/8 | |||
| 400 | 7/8 |
a Results presented as a number of protected/tested animals.
Results of a formalin test performed in mice at a dose of 44 mg/kg (i.p.).
| Phase | AUC a | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methylcellulose | KM-568 | % Control | SEM | ||
| Acute | 241.17 | 184.18 | 76.37 | 13.03 | >0.05 |
| Inflammatory | 819.31 | 556.81 | 67.96 | 13.27 | >0.05 |
a AUC-total area under curve in time after time of licking (time of formalin injection); b Student’s t-test.
Results of mutagenicity assessment of KM-568 in the Ames microplate format (MPF) assay presented as fold induction of the number of positive wells over baseline a.
| Compound | Concentration |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TA98 | TA100 | TA1535 | TA1537 | ||
| KM-568 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| PC b | 6.4 | 3.4 | 14.7 | 48.0 | |
a Baseline = mean zero-dose control + 1 SD) b Positive controls: 2-nitrofluorene (2-NF) at 2 µg/mL (TA98); 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide (4-NQO) at 0.1 µg/mL (TA100); N-4-aminocytidine (N4-ACT) at 100 µg/mL (TA1535); 9-aminoacridine (9-AAc) at 15 µg/mL (TA1537).
Figure 7Results of cytotoxicity evaluation of compound KM-568 and doxorubicin (DOX) in (a) HepG2 and (b) H9c2 cell lines in an MTT assay. Results were presented as mean ± SD from three samples.
Figure 8Results of cytotoxicity evaluation of compound KM-568 and doxorubicin (DOX) in an HepG2 cell line in an LDH assay. Results presented as mean ± SD from three samples.