Literature DB >> 32574622

Adherence of Infusible Biologics During the Time of COVID-19 Among Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Nationwide Veterans Affairs Cohort Study.

Nabeel Khan1, Dhruvan Patel2, Dawei Xie3, Tyler Pernes4, James Lewis5, Yu-Xiao Yang6.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adherence; Anti-TNF; COVID-19; Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32574622      PMCID: PMC7305703          DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.06.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


× No keyword cloud information.
The advent of biologics has evolved the treatment options for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, there are issues with nonadherence, especially with infusible biologics, as patients have to physically come to the hospital. Nonadherence is associated with higher rate of loss of response to biologic therapy, hospitalization, and increased health care cost. , The adherence to infusible biologic (infliximab, inflectra, renflexis, and vedolizumab) is of increased concern during the time of the COVID-19 pandemic. Since the national emergency declared in March 2020 for COVID-19 pandemic, patients are avoiding going to the hospital for regular care because they are fearful of contracting COVID-19, which has resulted in a >50% drop in hospital volume. The effect of COVID-19 on the adherence of infusible biologic is unknown. The aims of our study were to evaluate whether adherence to scheduled infusions of biologics declined after the declaration of national emergency and to determine factors associated with reduced adherence during the COVID-19 crisis. To understand the clinical consequence of nonadherence to biologics infusion, we also explored the association between adherence status and subsequent 6-month and 12-month corticosteroid requirements using 2019 data.

Methods

We conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort study using US national Veterans Affairs health care system data from the Veterans Affairs Informatics and Computing Infrastructure. The eligible IBD patients were identified from the Veterans Affairs health care system using a previously validated algorithm (Supplementary Material). To be included in the cohort, a patient must have received an infusible biologic between January 3, 2020 and March 13, 2020 (ie, the 10-week period before March 13, 2020, which is the date the United States declared a national emergency). The outcome was adherence with infusible biologics, which was defined as receiving an infusion within 10 weeks of the prior infusion. We chose 10 weeks because the maximum interval for infusion treatments is 8 weeks; we added 2 weeks to account for logistical challenges. Any patient that did not receive an infusion after 10 weeks was considered nonadherent. IBD patients from the same months in 2019 were also included as a benchmark to determine baseline adherence rate. Inclusion criteria and adherence in 2019 was defined in the same way as that in 2020. We used logistical regression with adherence as the outcome variable. Only patients in the 2020 cohort were included to identify factors associated with adherence during the COVID-19 crisis. Candidate predictors included age, sex, race, IBD type, geographical region, concomitant thiopurine use, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. We did a backward selection and kept only the variables with P < .05 in the final model. We also conducted 2 secondary analyses. For patients in 2019, we defined an index date that was 10 weeks after their last infusion between January 3, 2019 and March 13, 2019. We then looked at the incidence of any oral or intravenous corticosteroid use by adherence status within the 6-month and 12-month periods after the index date, respectively. Chi-square test was used for P values. In addition, we examined the weekly number of infusible biologics in Veterans Affairs Informatics and Computing Infrastructure between January 1, 2019 and May 31, 2020.

Results

We identified 2510 and 2516 patients in 2019 and 2020, respectively. The characteristics were similar in both groups (Table 1 ). Adherence was 84.6% in 2019 and 73.6% in 2020 (P < .0001 for the difference). In the final logistic regression model, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index was associated with lower adherence (odds ratio, 0.95 for 1-unit increase in Charlson Comorbidity Index; 95% confidence interval, 0.90–0.99; P = .048). The range of adherence to infusible biologics was from 68.4% to 77.3% across the different geographical locations in 2020. Compared with the Midwest, patients from the Southeastern region were less compliant (odds ratio, 0.635; 95% confidence interval, 0.487–0.828; P = .0008).
Table 1

Patient Characteristics in 2019 and 2020

Characteristic2020
2019
P value
nColumn %nColumn %
All2516100.02510100.0
Concomitant thiopurine.435
 Yes32512.934313.7
 No219187.1216786.3
Age.922
 <50 y103541.1104641.7
 50–65 y70528.070027.9
 >65 y77630.876430.4
Sex.832
 Male225089.4224089.2
 Female26610.627010.8
Race.622
 White87334.790736.1
 Black1646.51576.3
 Other140.6180.7
 Unknown146558.2142856.9
IBD diagnosis.586
 Crohn’s disease135453.8137054.6
 Ulcerative colitis116246.2114045.4
Geographic region.762
 Continental36914.736914.7
 Midwest64425.665025.9
 North Atlantic60123.959823.8
 Pacific41116.343517.3
 Southeast49119.545818.2
Charlson Comorbidity index.942
 0155861.9155161.8
 145117.944317.6
 2–332913.133813.5
 4–51094.31084.3
 6–7481.9431.7
 8+210.8271.1
Compliance< .0001
 Yes185173.6212384.6
 No66526.438715.4
Patient Characteristics in 2019 and 2020 In 2019, the 6-month incidence of any oral or intravenous corticosteroid use for those who adhered and who did not adhere were 18.2% and 23.5% (P = .014), and for 12 months it was 25.2% and 33.1% (P < .001), respectively. In Supplementary Figure 1, the weekly number of infusions remained stable in 2019 and started to decrease in late March 2020 and the decreasing trend continued through May 2020.
Supplementary Figure 1

Number of Infusions per week for patients with IBD in 2019 and 2020.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this study is the first that evaluated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the adherence of infusible biologics in patients with IBD. We found that adherence decreased from 84.6% in 2019 to 73.6% during the 2020 COVID-19 crisis. This reduction translated into a precipitous and persistent drop in the weekly number of infusions since late March 2020. Recent studies have found that anti–tumor necrosis factor medications do not increase the risk of getting COVID-19 or the worse outcomes of COVID-19. , Despite these findings and the importance of biologics in inducing and maintaining disease remission, our study found that nonadherence to infusible biologics increased by 70% after the COVID-19 pandemic began among patients with IBD nationwide. This is particularly relevant because scheduled maintenance therapy is superior to intermittent therapy to preserve remission and prevent formation of antibodies targeting the drug and infusion reactions. Our exploratory analysis also confirmed a significant association between nonadherence to biologics infusion and the subsequent risk of corticosteroid requirement among US veterans. Major strengths of the study include the use of a nationwide study cohort and using geographically diverse sample patient population. We were able to calculate adherence accurately, as infusion visits are completely captured in the medical records. This study captures recent data with the end point of May 2020. Thus, physicians can review the records of patients who were supposed to get their infusion in the last 3 months to evaluate whether treatment gaps occurred. As the Veterans Affairs health care system does not routinely use home infusions, we could not assess the impact of home infusion vs infusion center. In conclusion, using a nationwide Veterans Affairs database, we found that nonadherence to infusible biologics increased by 70% (or 11.0% point) after the COVID-19 pandemic began and almost one-quarter of patients had gaps of more than 10 weeks between infusions. Higher comorbidities and geographical locations were associated with increased nonadherence to infusible biologics. Quality improvement efforts, such as education programs for patients about the relative safety of these biologic medications and employment of social distancing within infusion centers, are needed to assure adherence to therapy despite the COVID-19 pandemic.
  3 in total

1.  Impact of infliximab adherence on Crohn's disease-related healthcare utilization and inpatient costs.

Authors:  Chureen T Carter; Heidi C Waters; Daniel B Smith
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  Nonadherence to Biologic Therapies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Authors:  Brian J Wentworth; Ross C D Buerlein; Anne G Tuskey; M Ashley Overby; Mark E Smolkin; Brian W Behm
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 5.325

Review 3.  Immunogenicity of Biologics in Chronic Inflammatory Diseases: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Vibeke Strand; Alejandro Balsa; Jamal Al-Saleh; Leonor Barile-Fabris; Takahiko Horiuchi; Tsutomu Takeuchi; Sadiq Lula; Charles Hawes; Blerina Kola; Lisa Marshall
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.807

  3 in total
  7 in total

1.  IBD therapeutics: what is in the pipeline?

Authors:  Alexandros Toskas; Ayesha Akbar
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-06-15

2.  0Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Treatment Adherence in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure.

Authors:  Sergey Yu Martsevich; Yulia V Lukina; Natalia P Kutishenko; Elmira T Guseynova
Journal:  Caspian J Intern Med       Date:  2022

3.  Medication adherence and complementary therapy usage in inflammatory bowel disease patients during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

Authors:  Alex Barnes; Jane Andrews; Paul Spizzo; Réme Mountifield
Journal:  JGH Open       Date:  2021-03-29

4.  Delayed Infliximab Treatment Affects the Outcomes of Patients With Crohn's Disease During the COVID-19 Epidemic in China: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Yong Li; Lulu Chen; Shuijiao Chen; Xiaowei Liu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-12

5.  COVID-19 pandemic and inflammatory bowel disease from patients' perspective: A survey from COVID epicenter in India.

Authors:  Aditya Kale; Leela Shinde; Sridhar Sundaram; Biswa R Patra; Praveen K Rao; Mohd Irtaza; Akash Shukla
Journal:  JGH Open       Date:  2022-01-15

6.  IBD Flare in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Therapy Discontinuation Is to Blame.

Authors:  Cristina Bezzio; Gionata Fiorino; Davide G Ribaldone; Alessandro Armuzzi; Simone Saibeni
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 7.290

7.  SARS-CoV-2 Viral Persistence Based on Cycle Threshold Value and Liver Injury in Patients With COVID-19.

Authors:  Grace Lai-Hung Wong; Terry Cheuk-Fung Yip; Vincent Wai-Sun Wong; Yee-Kit Tse; David Shu-Cheong Hui; Shui-Shan Lee; Eng-Kiong Yeoh; Henry Lik-Yuen Chan; Grace Chung-Yan Lui
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 3.835

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.