Literature DB >> 32574174

Precise automatic classification of 46 different pollen types with convolutional neural networks.

Víctor Sevillano1, Katherine Holt2, José L Aznarte1.   

Abstract

In palynology, the visual classification of pollen grains from different species is a hard task which is usually tackled by human operators using microscopes. Many industries, including medical and pharmaceutical, rely on the accuracy of this manual classification process, which is reported to be around 67%. In this paper, we propose a new method to automatically classify pollen grains using deep learning techniques that improve the correct classification rates in images not previously seen by the models. Our proposal manages to properly classify up to 98% of the examples from a dataset with 46 different classes of pollen grains, produced by the Classifynder classification system. This is an unprecedented result which surpasses all previous attempts both in accuracy and number and difficulty of taxa under consideration, which include types previously considered as indistinguishable.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32574174     DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  5 in total

1.  Discrimination of pollen of New Zealand mānuka (Leptospermum scoparium agg.) and kānuka (Kunzea spp.) (Myrtaceae).

Authors:  X Li; J G Prebble; P J de Lange; J I Raine; L Newstrom-Lloyd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Detecting Airborne Pollen Using an Automatic, Real-Time Monitoring System: Evidence from Two Sites.

Authors:  Maria Pilar Plaza; Franziska Kolek; Vivien Leier-Wirtz; Jens Otto Brunner; Claudia Traidl-Hoffmann; Athanasios Damialis
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Imaging Flow Cytometry as a Quick and Effective Identification Technique of Pollen Grains from Betulaceae, Oleaceae, Urticaceae and Asteraceae.

Authors:  Iwona Gierlicka; Idalia Kasprzyk; Maciej Wnuk
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 6.600

4.  Deep Learning Methods for Improving Pollen Monitoring.

Authors:  Elżbieta Kubera; Agnieszka Kubik-Komar; Krystyna Piotrowska-Weryszko; Magdalena Skrzypiec
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  DNA metabarcoding using nrITS2 provides highly qualitative and quantitative results for airborne pollen monitoring.

Authors:  Marcel Polling; Melati Sin; Letty A de Weger; Arjen G C L Speksnijder; Mieke J F Koenders; Hugo de Boer; Barbara Gravendeel
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 7.963

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.