Literature DB >> 32573866

Invasive mammalian predators habituate to and generalize avian prey cues: a mechanism for conserving native prey.

Catherine J Price1, Peter B Banks1, Samantha Brown2, M Cecilia Latham2, A David M Latham2, Roger P Pech2, Grant L Norbury3.   

Abstract

Invasive mammalian predators can cause the decline and extinction of vulnerable native species. Many invasive mammalian predators are dietary generalists that hunt a variety of prey. These predators often rely upon olfaction when foraging, particularly at night. Little is understood about how prey odor cues are used to inform foraging decisions. Prey cues can vary spatially and temporally in their association with prey and can either reveal the location of prey or lead to unsuccessful foraging. Here we examine how two wild-caught invasive mammalian bird predator species (European hedgehogs Erinaceus europaeus and ferrets Mustela putorius furo) respond to unrewarded bird odors over successive exposures, first demonstrating that the odors are perceptually different using house mice (Mus musculus) as a biological olfactometer. We aim to test if introduced predators categorize odor cues of similar prey together, a tactic that could increase foraging efficiency. We exposed house mice to the odors using a standard habituation/dishabituation test in a laboratory setting, and wild-caught European hedgehogs and ferrets in an outdoor enclosure using a similar procedure. Mice discriminated among all bird odors presented, showing more interest in chicken odor than quail or gull odor. Both predator species showed a decline in interest toward unrewarded prey odor (i.e., habituation), but only ferrets generalized their response from one unrewarded bird odor to another bird odor. Hedgehog responses to unrewarded bird odors were highly variable between individuals. Taken together, our results reveal interspecific and intraspecific differences in response to prey odors, which we argue are a consequence of different diet breadth, life and evolutionary histories, and the conditions in each experiment. Generalization of prey odors may have enabled some species of invasive predators to efficiently hunt a range of intraguild prey species, for example, ground-nesting shorebirds. Olfactory manipulation of predators may be a useful conservation tool for threatened prey if it reduces the conspicuousness of vulnerable prey.
© 2020 by the Ecological Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal learning; conservation behavior; foraging; information use; introduced predator; invasive species; nest predation; olfaction; predation risk; predator-prey interactions; sensory ecology

Year:  2020        PMID: 32573866     DOI: 10.1002/eap.2200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  2 in total

1.  The exploitation of sexual signals by predators: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thomas E White; Tanya Latty; Kate D L Umbers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 5.530

2.  Misinformation tactics protect rare birds from problem predators.

Authors:  Grant L Norbury; Catherine J Price; M Cecilia Latham; Samantha J Brown; A David M Latham; Gretchen E Brownstein; Hayley C Ricardo; Nikki J McArthur; Peter B Banks
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 14.136

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.