Literature DB >> 32573408

Fluorinated steroids are not superior to any treatment to ameliorate the outcome of autoimmune mediated congenital heart block: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.

Ariela Hoxha1, Elena Mattia2, Anna Zanetti3, Greta Carrara4, Nathalie Morel5, Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau6, Antonio L Brucato7, Amelia Ruffatti2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Fluorinated steroids are largely the therapeutic approach of autoimmune mediated congenital heart block (CHB). We performed a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of fluorinated steroids for the treatment of CHB.
METHODS: Studies evaluating the efficacy of fluorinated steroids versus no treatment in CHB patients were identified in electronic databases. Random-effects model was used to pool odds ratio (OR) (with 95% CI) of live births as the primary outcome. ORs of CHB progression, pacemaker implantation and extranodal disease were the secondary outcome. Subgroup analysis according to CHB grade and study type was performed.
RESULTS: Data from nine studies involving 747 patients were analysed. The overall live birth rates were 86.8% and 86.7%, respectively, in the fluorinated steroids exposed foetuses and in the non-exposed ones. Fluorinated steroids did not ameliorate overall survival in CHB (OR 1.02; 95% CI: 0.65-1.61) with any significant statistical heterogeneity between studies (I2 0%, p=0.45). No significant differences for the progression of CHB, the pacing and the presence of extranodal disease were observed. Subgroup analysis revealed a significant protective role of fluorinated steroids for survival in 3rd degree CHB and for pacing in monocentric studies, OR 4.07; 95% CI: 1.10-15.08 and OR 0.15; 95% CI: 0.02-0.99, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis shows that fluorinated steroids are not superior to any treatment in patients with CHB in terms of live birth, prevention of progression of incomplete CHB, pacemaker implantation and extranodal disease. Thus, considering their side effects, their use in CHB patients should be discouraged.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32573408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol        ISSN: 0392-856X            Impact factor:   4.473


  4 in total

1.  Short and long-term outcomes of children with autoimmune congenital heart block treated with a combined maternal-neonatal therapy. A comparison study.

Authors:  Amelia Ruffatti; Alessia Cerutti; Marta Tonello; Maria Favaro; Teresa Del Ross; Antonia Calligaro; Chiara Grava; Margherita Zen; Ariela Hoxha; Giovanni Di Salvo
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Autoimmune Congenital Heart Block: A Review of Biomarkers and Management of Pregnancy.

Authors:  Sara De Carolis; Cristina Garufi; Ester Garufi; Maria Pia De Carolis; Angela Botta; Sara Tabacco; Silvia Salvi
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 3.418

3.  To Be or Not to Be: Surviving Immune-Mediated Fetal Heart Disease.

Authors:  Edgar Jaeggi; Lisa Hornberger; Bettina Cuneo; Anita J Moon-Grady; Marie-Josée Raboisson; Jane Lougheed; Karim Diab; Wadi Mawad; Earl Silverman
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 6.106

4.  To Be or Not to Be Treated: That Is the Question in Managing a Fetus With Cardiac Injury Exposed to Anti-SSA/Ro.

Authors:  Jill Buyon; Amit Saxena; Deborah Friedman; Peter Izmirly
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 6.106

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.