Literature DB >> 32572549

Characterizing introgression-by-environment interactions using maize near isogenic lines.

Zhi Li1, Sara B Tirado1,2, Dnyaneshwar C Kadam1, Lisa Coffey3, Nathan D Miller4, Edgar P Spalding4, Aaron J Lorenz1, Natalia de Leon5, Shawn M Kaeppler5, Patrick S Schnable3, Nathan M Springer2, Candice N Hirsch6.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: Significant introgression-by-environment interactions are observed for traits throughout development from small introgressed segments of the genome. Relatively small genomic introgressions containing quantitative trait loci can have significant impacts on the phenotype of an individual plant. However, the magnitude of phenotypic effects for the same introgression can vary quite substantially in different environments due to introgression-by-environment interactions. To study potential patterns of introgression-by-environment interactions, fifteen near-isogenic lines (NILs) with > 90% B73 genetic background and multiple Mo17 introgressions were grown in 16 different environments. These environments included five geographical locations with multiple planting dates and multiple planting densities. The phenotypic impact of the introgressions was evaluated for up to 26 traits that span different growth stages in each environment to assess introgression-by-environment interactions. Results from this study showed that small portions of the genome can drive significant genotype-by-environment interaction across a wide range of vegetative and reproductive traits, and the magnitude of the introgression-by-environment interaction varies across traits. Some introgressed segments were more prone to introgression-by-environment interaction than others when evaluating the interaction on a whole plant basis throughout developmental time, indicating variation in phenotypic plasticity throughout the genome. Understanding the profile of introgression-by-environment interaction in NILs is useful in consideration of how small introgressions of QTL or transgene containing regions might be expected to impact traits in diverse environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32572549     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-020-03630-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  22 in total

1.  Genotype Imputation with Millions of Reference Samples.

Authors:  Brian L Browning; Sharon R Browning
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  Genotype×environment interaction QTL mapping in plants: lessons from Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Mohamed El-Soda; Marcos Malosetti; Bas J Zwaan; Maarten Koornneef; Mark G M Aarts
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 18.313

3.  B73-Mo17 near-isogenic lines demonstrate dispersed structural variation in maize.

Authors:  Steven R Eichten; Jillian M Foerster; Natalia de Leon; Ying Kai; Cheng-Ting Yeh; Sanzhen Liu; Jeffrey A Jeddeloh; Patrick S Schnable; Shawn M Kaeppler; Nathan M Springer
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  AMMI adjustment for statistical analysis of an international wheat yield trial.

Authors:  J Crossa; P N Fox; W H Pfeiffer; S Rajaram; H G Gauch
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species.

Authors:  Robert J Elshire; Jeffrey C Glaubitz; Qi Sun; Jesse A Poland; Ken Kawamoto; Edward S Buckler; Sharon E Mitchell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Mantel test in population genetics.

Authors:  José Alexandre F Diniz-Filho; Thannya N Soares; Jacqueline S Lima; Ricardo Dobrovolski; Victor Lemes Landeiro; Mariana Pires de Campos Telles; Thiago F Rangel; Luis Mauricio Bini
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 1.771

7.  Genotype × Environment Interactions of Yield Traits in Backcross Introgression Lines Derived from Oryza sativa cv. Swarna/Oryza nivara.

Authors:  Divya Balakrishnan; Desiraju Subrahmanyam; Jyothi Badri; Addanki Krishnam Raju; Yadavalli Venkateswara Rao; Kavitha Beerelli; Sukumar Mesapogu; Malathi Surapaneni; Revathi Ponnuswamy; G Padmavathi; V Ravindra Babu; Sarla Neelamraju
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Stability and genotype by environment interaction of provitamin A carotenoid and dry matter content in cassava in Uganda.

Authors:  Williams Esuma; Robert Sezi Kawuki; Liezel Herselman; Maryke Tine Labuschagne
Journal:  Breed Sci       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 2.086

9.  Maize ARGOS1 (ZAR1) transgenic alleles increase hybrid maize yield.

Authors:  Mei Guo; Mary A Rupe; Jun Wei; Chris Winkler; Marymar Goncalves-Butruille; Ben P Weers; Sharon F Cerwick; Jo Ann Dieter; Keith E Duncan; Richard J Howard; Zhenglin Hou; Carlos M Löffler; Mark Cooper; Carl R Simmons
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 6.992

10.  TASSEL-GBS: a high capacity genotyping by sequencing analysis pipeline.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Glaubitz; Terry M Casstevens; Fei Lu; James Harriman; Robert J Elshire; Qi Sun; Edward S Buckler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Hybridization and introgression in sympatric and allopatric populations of four oak species.

Authors:  Xuan Li; Gaoming Wei; Yousry A El-Kassaby; Yanming Fang
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.215

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.