Literature DB >> 32572367

Role of the Ilizarov non-free bone plasty in the management of long bone defects and nonunion: Problems solved and unsolved.

Dmitry Y Borzunov1, Sergei N Kolchin2, Tatiana A Malkova3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ilizarov non-free bone plasty is a method of distraction osteogenesis using the Ilizarov apparatus for external fixation which originated in Russia and was disseminated across the world. It has been used in long bone defect and nonunion management along with free vascularized grafting and induced membrane technique. However, the shortcomings and problems of these methods still remain the issues which restrict their overall use. AIM: To study the recent available literature on the role of Ilizarov non-free bone plasty in long bone defect and nonunion management, its problems and the solutions to these problems in order to achieve better treatment outcomes.
METHODS: Three databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) were searched for literature sources on distraction osteogenesis, free vascularized grafting and induced membrane technique used in long bone defect and nonunion treatment within a five-year period (2015-2019). Full-text clinical articles in the English language were selected for analysis only if they contained treatment results, complications and described large patient samples (not less than ten cases for congenital, post-tumor resection cases or rare conditions, and more than 20 cases for the rest). Case reports were excluded.
RESULTS: Fifty full-text articles and reviews on distraction osteogenesis were chosen. Thirty-five clinical studies containing large series of patients treated with this method and problems with its outcome were analyzed. It was found that distraction osteogenesis techniques provide treatment for segmental bone defects and nonunion of the lower extremity in many clinical situations, especially in complex problems. The Ilizarov techniques treat the triad of problems simultaneously (bone loss, soft-tissue loss and infection). Management of tibial defects mostly utilizes the Ilizarov circular fixator. Monolateral fixators are preferable in the femur. The use of a ring fixator is recommended in patients with an infected tibial bone gap of more than 6 cm. High rates of successful treatment were reported by the authors that ranged from 77% to 100% and depended on the pathology and the type of Ilizarov technique used. Hybrid fixation and autogenous grafting are the most applicable solutions to avoid after-frame regenerate fracture or deformity and docking site nonunion.
CONCLUSION: The role of Ilizarov non-free bone plasty has not lost its significance in the treatment of segmental bone defects despite the shortcomings and treatment problems encountered. ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone defect; Bone nonunion; Bone transport; Distraction osteogenesis; Free vascularized grafts; Ilizarov method; Induced membrane technique complication

Year:  2020        PMID: 32572367      PMCID: PMC7298454          DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i6.304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Orthop        ISSN: 2218-5836


  8 in total

1.  Matched comparative study of trifocal bone transport versus induced membrane followed by trifocal bone transport in the treatment of segmental tibial defects caused by posttraumatic osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Yimurang Hamiti; Maimaiaili Yushan; Ainizier Yalikun; Cheng Lu; Aihemaitijiang Yusufu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 2.562

Review 2.  The progress in quantitative evaluation of callus during distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Qi Liu; Ze Liu; Hongbin Guo; Jieyu Liang; Yi Zhang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 2.562

3.  High slew rate pulsed electromagnetic field enhances bone consolidation and shortens daily treatment duration in distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Yucong Li; Yongkang Yang; Ming Wang; Xiaoting Zhang; Shanshan Bai; Xuan Lu; Yuan Li; Erik I Waldorff; Nianli Zhang; Wayne Yuk-Wai Lee; Gang Li
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 5.853

4.  Reconstruction of massive tibial defect caused by osteomyelitis using induced membrane followed by trifocal bone transport technique: a retrospective study and our experience.

Authors:  Yimurang Hamiti; Maimaiaili Yushan; Cheng Lu; Aihemaitijiang Yusufu
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Evaluation of complications associated with bifocal bone transport as treatment for either proximal, intermediate or distal femoral defects caused by infection: outcome analysis of 76 patients.

Authors:  Cong Peng; Kai Liu; Qi Tian; Maimaitiaili Tusunniyazi; Weiqi Kong; Haopeng Luan; Xiaokang Liu; Yan Zhao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Ilizarov bone transport combined with the Masquelet technique for bone defects of various etiologies (preliminary results).

Authors:  Dmitry Y Borzunov; Sergey N Kolchin; Denis S Mokhovikov; Tatiana A Malkova
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2022-03-18

7.  Bone Bricks: The Effect of Architecture and Material Composition on the Mechanical and Biological Performance of Bone Scaffolds.

Authors:  Evangelos Daskalakis; Boyang Huang; Cian Vyas; Anil A Acar; Fengyuan Liu; Ali Fallah; Glen Cooper; Andrew Weightman; Gordon Blunn; Bahattin Koç; Paulo Bartolo
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-02-22

8.  Efficacy comparison of trifocal bone transport using unilateral external fixator for femoral and tibial bone defects caused by infection.

Authors:  Kai Liu; Yanshi Liu; Feiyu Cai; Chenchen Fan; Peng Ren; Aihemaitijiang Yusufu
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 2.102

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.