| Literature DB >> 32572354 |
Neil Grech1, Theresia Dalli1, Sean Mizzi2, Lara Meilak2, Neville Calleja3,4, Antoine Zrinzo2.
Abstract
Background and Objectives The incidence of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) ranges from 0.59 to 5 per 100,000 persons, and it is on the rise in many countries. The reason for this rise is multifactorial, and possible contributing factors include an aging population, overdiagnosis, ionizing radiation, air pollution and others. The aim of this study is to conduct an epidemiological study of GBM in a well-defined population over a 10-year period and determine its significance, while comparing results with international standards. Materials and Methods All histological diagnoses of GBM in Malta from 2008 to 2017 were identified. Poisson regression was used to determine significance in incidence variation. Log-rank tests were used to compare the survival distributions of each variable. Cox regression for survival analysis with the Breslow method for ties was then performed to consider the overall model. Results A total of 100 patients (61 males; mean age 60.29±10.09 years) were diagnosed with GBM over the period 2008 to 2017. There was a significant increase in incidence from 0.73 to 4.49 per 100,000 over the 10-year period (p≤0.001). The most common presenting complaint was limb paresis (29%). Approximately 65% of patients were treated with maximum safe resection (MSR). Using Cox regression analysis, younger age at presentation and treatment with MSR significantly improved survival (p=0.026 and p≤0.001, respectively). The median survival was 10 months. Conclusions An increasing incidence of GBM is becoming evident, while the median survival remains low. This troubling trend emphasizes the importance of further research into GBM etiology and treatment.Entities:
Keywords: epidemiology; glioblastoma multiforme; incidence; survival; well-defined population
Year: 2020 PMID: 32572354 PMCID: PMC7302718 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.8195
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
Cases and incidence of glioblastoma multiforme per year
| Year | Cases | Incidence per 100,000 based on mid-year population |
| 2008 | 3 | 0.73 |
| 2009 | 4 | 0.97 |
| 2010 | 12 | 2.90 |
| 2011 | 8 | 1.92 |
| 2012 | 6 | 1.43 |
| 2013 | 7 | 1.64 |
| 2014 | 10 | 2.30 |
| 2015 | 15 | 3.37 |
| 2016 | 14 | 3.07 |
| 2017 | 21 | 4.49 |
Figure 1Cases and incidence of glioblastoma multiforme per year, with possible causal factors
MGMT: O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase
Characteristics of patients
*Others including visual field defect, personality change, ataxia, syncope, sensory deficits and unknown presentation
IDH: isocitrate dehydrogenase; MGMT: O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase
| Characteristic | |
| Gender, no. (%) | |
| Male | 61 (61) |
| Female | 39 (39) |
| Age at presentation, years | |
| Mean | 60.29±10.09 |
| Median | 62 |
| Range | 28-80 |
| Cases per 10-year age range, no. (%) | |
| 20-29 | 1 (1) |
| 30-39 | 3 (3) |
| 40-49 | 10 (10) |
| 50-59 | 25 (25) |
| 60-69 | 47 (47) |
| 70-79 | 13 (13) |
| 80-89 | 1 (1) |
| Tumor position, no. (%) | |
| Frontal lobe | 25 (25) |
| Parietal lobe | 23 (23) |
| Temporal lobe | 21 (21) |
| Multiple lobe involvement | 21 (21) |
| Other (butterfly glioma, thalamus and brainstem) | 6 (6) |
| Occipital lobe | 4 (4) |
| Presenting complaint, no. (%) | |
| Limb paresis | 29 (29) |
| Headaches | 19 (19) |
| Seizures | 9 (9) |
| Confusion | 9 (9) |
| Cranial nerve palsy | 7 (7) |
| Speech difficulty | 6 (6) |
| Incidental finding | 2 (2) |
| Other* | 19 (19) |
| Maximum safe resection, no. (%) | |
| Yes | 65 (65) |
| No | 35 (35) |
| IDH1 status, no. (%) | |
| Present | 0 (0) |
| Absent | 15 (15) |
| Not tested | 85 (85) |
| IDH2 status, no. (%) | |
| Present | 0 (0) |
| Absent | 12 (12) |
| Not tested | 88 (88) |
| MGMT methylation, no. (%) | |
| Unmethylated (methylation rate for all the sites is less than 10%) | 15 (15) |
| Low level of methylation (methylation rate for all the sites is 10% and 19%) | 2 (2) |
| Methylated (methylation rate for all the sites is more than 20%) | 5 (5) |
| Not tested | 88 (88) |
Figure 2Kaplan-Meier curve of overall survival
Variables and their significance on survival
*Although a significant value was calculated, the Kaplan-Meier curve showed overlap between the curves of the variable ‘geographical regions’; therefore, it could not be included in the multivariable cox regression. Together with the small sample sizes within each region, significance was lost
MGMT: O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase; IDH: isocitrate dehydrogenase
| Variable | P value |
| Gender | 0.199 |
| Age of diagnosis | 0.019 |
| Geographical regions | <0.001* |
| Maximum safe resection vs no resection | <0.001 |
| MGMT testing vs no testing | 0.671 |
| MGMT methylation status | 0.074 |
| IDH1 testing vs no testing | 0.765 |
| IDH2 testing vs no testing | 0.857 |
| Reoperation vs no reoperation | 0.121 |
| Year of biopsy | 0.627 |
| Time from presentation till time of tissue diagnosis | 0.726 |
Overall model of Cox regression
| Variable | Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) | P value |
| Age of diagnosis | 1.04 (1.013-1.067) | 0.003 |
| Maximum safe resection | 3.03 (1.867-4.908) | <0.001 |
Figure 3Kaplan-Meier survival estimates by resection