| Literature DB >> 32572105 |
J-G Hwang1, G Schiwietz2, M Abo-Bakr2, T Atkinson2, M Ries2, P Goslawski2, G Klemz2, R Müller2, A Schälicke2, A Jankowiak2.
Abstract
Temporally short X-ray pulses are an indispensable tool for the study of electron transitions close to the Fermi energy and structural changes in molecules undergoing chemical reactions which take place on a time-scale of hundreds of femtoseconds. The time resolution of experiments at 3rd generation light sources which produce intense synchrotron radiation is limited fundamentally by the electron-bunch length in the range of tens of picoseconds. Here we propose a new scheme for the generation of intense and coherent sub-femtoseconds soft X-ray pulses in storage rings by applying the Echo-Enabled Harmonic Generation (EEHG) method. Many issues for obtaining the EEHG structure such as two modulators and a radiator are solved by a paradigm shift in an achromatic storage ring cell. Numerical demonstration of the feasibility of the scheme for the BESSY II beam parameters is presented.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32572105 PMCID: PMC7308344 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-67027-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Schematic view of the proposed scheme by connecting two straight sections using an achromatic cell as a dispersive magnetic chicane. For BESSY II, the first magnetic chicane C1 is a double bend achromatic (DBA) cell and the first modulator M1 is installed inside the first straight section. The second modulator M2, magnetic chicane C2, and the radiator are installed at the second straight section.
Figure 2The evolution of and elements along the beamline of the BESSY II storage ring. The beam line has the of about 11 mm which is suitable for the EEHG scheme. Yellow, red, green boxes represent dipole, quadrupole, sextupole magnets, respectively.
Major parameters for the generation of sub-femtosecond X-ray (0.83 keV) pulses in the BESSY II storage ring.
| Parameters | Units | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Beam Energy | GeV | 1.7 |
| Relative energy spread | 7 × 10−4 | |
| Bunch current | mA | 4 |
| Bunch length rms | ps | 30 |
| Modulator period length | cm | 13.9 |
| First modulator period | 10 | |
| Second modulator period | 1 | |
| Laser wavelength | nm | 800 |
| First laser pulse energy | 110 | |
| First laser pulse duration FWHM | fs | 200 |
| Second laser pulse energy | 196 | |
| Second laser pulse duration FWHM | fs | 5 |
| Radiator period length | cm | 1.7 |
| Radiator period | 88 | |
| DBA cell | mm | 11 |
| Magnetic chicane | −20.7 |
Figure 3A fragment of the electron bunch in longitudinal phase space after first modulator M1 (a) and after the DBA cell C1 (b). The horizontal axis is the distance along the bunch and the vertical axis is energy deviation from the equilibrium energy normalized to the rms energy spread in the undisturbed electron bunch.
Figure 4Longitudinal phase space after the second chicane C2 showing the microstructure inside the central peak (a) and the bunching factor (b) with and without the high-order aberration correction via sextupoles. One observes the increase of the background moving towards smaller harmonic numbers due to the bandwidth dilution at lower frequencies.
Figure 5Radiation power along bunch position calculated (see Fig. 4) using GENESIS.
The peak power and pulse length of the EEHG scheme at different wavelengths within the tunable range.
| Photon energy (eV) | optimum | optimum | Pulse duration FWHM (fs) | Peak power (kW) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 400 | 4.4 | −42.9 | 0.69 | 1025 |
| 500 | 5.4 | −34.2 | 0.49 | 989 |
| 600 | 6.5 | −28.4 | 0.47 | 810 |
| 700 | 7.6 | −24.5 | 0.31 | 771 |
| 830 | 8.6 | −21.5 | 0.29 | 1051 |