Literature DB >> 32571891

Prognostic factors in patients with vulvar cancer: the VULCAN study.

Ignacio Zapardiel1, Sara Iacoponi1, Pluvio J Coronado2, Kamil Zalewski3, Frank Chen4, Christina Fotopoulou4, Polat Dursun5, Ioannis C Kotsopoulos6, Robert Jach7, Alessandro Buda8, Maria J Martinez-Serrano9, Christoph Grimm10, Robert Fruscio8, Enrique Garcia11, Jacek Jan Sznurkowski12, Cristina Ruiz13, Maria C Noya14, Dib Barazi15, Javier Diez16, Begoña Diaz De la Noval17, Arnoldas Bartusevicius18, Pierandrea De Iaco19, Maria Otero20, Maria Diaz21, Dimitrios Haidopoulos22, Silvia Franco23, Pawel Blecharz24, Miguel A Zuñiga25, Patricia Rubio26, Barbara Gardella27, Dimitrios C Papatheodorou28, Yusuf Yildirim29, Francesc Fargas30, Ronalds Macuks31.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze the prognostic factors for overall and progression-free survival in patients with vulvar cancer.
METHODS: This international, multicenter, retrospective study included 2453 patients diagnosed with vulvar cancer at 100 different institutions. Inclusion criteria were institutional review board approval from each collaborating center, pathologic diagnosis of invasive carcinoma of the vulva, and primary treatment performed at the participating center. Patients with intraepithelial neoplasia or primary treatment at non-participating centers were excluded. Global survival analysis and squamous cell histology subanalysis was performed.
RESULTS: After excluding patients due to incomplete data entry, 1727 patients treated for vulvar cancer between January 2001 and December 2005 were registered for analysis (1535 squamous, 42 melanomas, 38 Paget's disease and 112 other histologic types). Melanomas had the worse prognosis (p=0.02). In squamous vulvar tumors, independent factors for increase in local recurrence of vulvar cancer were: no prior radiotherapy (p<0.001) or chemotherapy (p=0.006), and for distant recurrence were the number of positive inguinal nodes (p=0.025), and not having undergone lymphadenectomy (p=0.03) or radiotherapy (p<0.001), with a HR of 1.1 (95% CI 1.2 to 1.21), 2.9 (95% CI 1.4 to 6.1), and 3.1 (95% CI 1.7 to 5.7), respectively. Number of positive nodes (p=0.008), FIGO stage (p<0.001), adjuvant chemotherapy (p=0.001), tumor resection margins (p=0.045), and stromal invasion >5 mm (p=0.001) were correlated with poor overall survival, and large case volume (≥9 vs <9 cases per year) correlated with more favorable overall survival (p=0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Advanced patient age, number of positive inguinal lymph nodes, and lack of adjuvant treatment are significantly associated with a higher risk of relapse in patients with squamous cell vulvar cancer. Case volume per treating institution, FIGO stage, and stromal invasion appear to impact overall survival significantly. Future prospective trials are warranted to establish these prognostic factors for vulvar cancer. © IGCS and ESGO 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  neoplasm recurrence, local; vulvar and vaginal cancer; vulvar neoplasms

Year:  2020        PMID: 32571891     DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  7 in total

1.  Prognostic factors for recurrence and survival in uncommon variants of vulvar cancer.

Authors:  Ignacio Zapardiel; Myriam Gracia; Javier Díez; Alessandro Buda; Maria C Noya; Pierandrea De Iaco; Pedro Vieira-Baptista; Sara Iacoponi
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Risk factors and temporal patterns of recurrences in patients with vulvar cancer: implications for follow-up intervals and duration.

Authors:  Katharina Röhrmoser; Atanas Ignatov; Michael Gerken; Olaf Ortmann; Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke; Thomas Papathemelis
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Observational multicenter Italian study on vulvar cancer adjuvant radiotherapy (OLDLADY 1.2): a cooperation among AIRO Gyn, MITO and MaNGO groups.

Authors:  Gabriella Macchia; Calogero Casà; Martina Ferioli; Valentina Lancellotta; Donato Pezzulla; Brigida Pappalardi; Concetta Laliscia; Edy Ippolito; Jacopo Di Muzio; Alessandra Huscher; Francesca Tortoreto; Mariangela Boccardi; Roberta Lazzari; Pierandrea De Iaco; Francesco Raspagliesi; Angiolo Gadducci; Giorgia Garganese; Gabriella Ferrandina; Alessio Giuseppe Morganti; Luca Tagliaferri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 6.313

4.  Human Papillomavirus‒Positive and ‒Negative Vulvar Squamous Cell Carcinoma Are Biologically but Not Clinically Distinct.

Authors:  Elysha Kolitz; Elena Lucas; Gregory A Hosler; Jiwoong Kim; Suntrea Hammer; Cheryl Lewis; Lin Xu; Andrew T Day; Melissa Mauskar; Jayanthi S Lea; Richard C Wang
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 7.590

Review 5.  Electrochemotherapy in Vulvar Cancer and Cisplatin Combined with Electroporation. Systematic Review and In Vitro Studies.

Authors:  Anna Myriam Perrone; Gloria Ravegnini; Stefano Miglietta; Lisa Argnani; Martina Ferioli; Eugenia De Crescenzo; Marco Tesei; Marco Di Stanislao; Giulia Girolimetti; Giuseppe Gasparre; Anna Maria Porcelli; Francesca De Terlizzi; Claudio Zamagni; Alessio Giuseppe Morganti; Pierandrea De Iaco
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Vulval cancer in pregnancy: Two case reports.

Authors:  Ellen Gaunt; Rachel Pounds; Jason Yap
Journal:  Case Rep Womens Health       Date:  2021-12-11

7.  Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Vulva: A Survival and Epidemiologic Study with Focus on Surgery and Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Matteo Scampa; Daniel F Kalbermatten; Carlo M Oranges
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 4.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.