OBJECTIVES: Valganciclovir (VGCV) is used as prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of 1 year of preemptive VGCV administration compared with a shorter administration after pediatric LDLT. METHODS: VGCV was administered to 56 children who underwent LDLT. CMV and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) antibody status, pp65 antigenemia, and other laboratory data were assessed at 1 year after LDLT. Patients were divided into the 1-year group (n = 32) (patients who had 1 year of VGCV administration) and the <1-year group (n = 24) (patients who had less than 1 year of VGCV administration). RESULTS: Study participants consisted of 34 females and 22 males, with a mean age of 4.2 years at transplant. Regarding pretransplant donor (D)/recipient (R) CMV antibody status, 13 were D positive (+)/R negative (-), 27 were D+/R+, 8 were D-/R+, and 8 were D-/R-. For EBV, 22 were D+/R+, 32 were D+/R-, and 2 were D-/R-. In the 1-year group, only 2 patients (6.5%) developed CMV infection, whereas 8 patients (33.3%) developed CMV infection in the <1-year group. The CMV pp65 antigenemia assay was positive in 2 patients. CMV IgM was positive in 7 patients. One year of preemptive VGCV administration was associated with a lower incidence of CMV infection (P = .008), but not EBV infection. No adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: One year of preemptive VGCV administration after LDLT is safe and suppresses CMV infection. It was useful after pediatric LDLT.
OBJECTIVES:Valganciclovir (VGCV) is used as prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of 1 year of preemptive VGCV administration compared with a shorter administration after pediatric LDLT. METHODS:VGCV was administered to 56 children who underwent LDLT. CMV and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) antibody status, pp65 antigenemia, and other laboratory data were assessed at 1 year after LDLT. Patients were divided into the 1-year group (n = 32) (patients who had 1 year of VGCV administration) and the <1-year group (n = 24) (patients who had less than 1 year of VGCV administration). RESULTS: Study participants consisted of 34 females and 22 males, with a mean age of 4.2 years at transplant. Regarding pretransplant donor (D)/recipient (R) CMV antibody status, 13 were D positive (+)/R negative (-), 27 were D+/R+, 8 were D-/R+, and 8 were D-/R-. For EBV, 22 were D+/R+, 32 were D+/R-, and 2 were D-/R-. In the 1-year group, only 2 patients (6.5%) developed CMV infection, whereas 8 patients (33.3%) developed CMV infection in the <1-year group. The CMV pp65 antigenemia assay was positive in 2 patients. CMV IgM was positive in 7 patients. One year of preemptive VGCV administration was associated with a lower incidence of CMV infection (P = .008), but not EBV infection. No adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: One year of preemptive VGCV administration after LDLT is safe and suppresses CMV infection. It was useful after pediatric LDLT.