Literature DB >> 32571519

Bayesian modelling captures inter-individual differences in social belief computations in the putamen and insula.

Lara Henco1, Marie-Luise Brandi2, Juha M Lahnakoski3, Andreea O Diaconescu4, Christoph Mathys5, Leonhard Schilbach6.   

Abstract

Computational models of social learning and decision-making provide mechanistic tools to investigate the neural mechanisms that are involved in understanding other people. While most studies employ explicit instructions to learn from social cues, everyday life is characterized by the spontaneous use of such signals (e.g., the gaze of others) to infer on internal states such as intentions. To investigate the neural mechanisms of the impact of gaze cues on learning and decision-making, we acquired behavioural and fMRI data from 50 participants performing a probabilistic task, in which cards with varying winning probabilities had to be chosen. In addition, the task included a computer-generated face that gazed towards one of these cards providing implicit advice. Participants' individual belief trajectories were inferred using a hierarchical Gaussian filter (HGF) and used as predictors in a linear model of neuronal activation. During learning, social prediction errors were correlated with activity in inferior frontal gyrus and insula. During decision-making, the belief about the accuracy of the social cue was correlated with activity in inferior temporal gyrus, putamen and pallidum while the putamen and insula showed activity as a function of individual differences in weighting the social cue during decision-making. Our findings demonstrate that model-based fMRI can give insight into the behavioural and neural aspects of spontaneous social cue integration in learning and decision-making. They provide evidence for a mechanistic involvement of specific components of the basal ganglia in subserving these processes.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian modelling; Learning and decision-making; Social inference; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32571519     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.02.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  6 in total

Review 1.  An insula hierarchical network architecture for active interoceptive inference.

Authors:  Alan S R Fermin; Karl Friston; Shigeto Yamawaki
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.653

2.  Neural arbitration between social and individual learning systems.

Authors:  Andreea Oliviana Diaconescu; Madeline Stecy; Lars Kasper; Christopher J Burke; Zoltan Nagy; Christoph Mathys; Philippe N Tobler
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Paranoia, self-deception and overconfidence.

Authors:  Rosa A Rossi-Goldthorpe; Yuan Chang Leong; Pantelis Leptourgos; Philip R Corlett
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  The computational relationship between reinforcement learning, social inference, and paranoia.

Authors:  Joseph M Barnby; Mitul A Mehta; Michael Moutoussis
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 4.779

5.  Aberrant computational mechanisms of social learning and decision-making in schizophrenia and borderline personality disorder.

Authors:  Lara Henco; Andreea O Diaconescu; Juha M Lahnakoski; Marie-Luise Brandi; Sophia Hörmann; Johannes Hennings; Alkomiet Hasan; Irina Papazova; Wolfgang Strube; Dimitris Bolis; Leonhard Schilbach; Christoph Mathys
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Paranoia and belief updating during the COVID-19 crisis.

Authors:  Praveen Suthaharan; Erin J Reed; Pantelis Leptourgos; Joshua G Kenney; Stefan Uddenberg; Christoph D Mathys; Leib Litman; Jonathan Robinson; Aaron J Moss; Jane R Taylor; Stephanie M Groman; Philip R Corlett
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-07-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.