| Literature DB >> 32571222 |
Xiujuan Su1,2, Guozhong Zhu1, Xiaohui Song1, Haijiang Xu3, Weixi Li1, Xinzhu Ning4, Quanjia Chen2, Wangzhen Guo5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sea island cotton (Gossypium barbadense) has markedly superior high quality fibers, which plays an important role in the textile industry and acts as a donor for upland cotton (G. hirsutum) fiber quality improvement. The genetic characteristics analysis and the identification of key genes will be helpful to understand the mechanism of fiber development and breeding utilization in sea island cotton.Entities:
Keywords: Fiber quality; Genetic diversity; Genome-wide association study; Gossypium barbadense; Quantitative trait loci; Salt stress
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32571222 PMCID: PMC7310526 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-020-02502-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Fig. 1Population characteristics of the 279 sea island cotton accessions. a. A neighbor-joining tree was constructed using SNP data. b. PCA plot of the first two components (PC1 and PC2). c. Population structure analysis with K = 3. d. Nucleotide diversity (π) and population divergence (Fst) across the three cotton groups. The pie charts show percentage of introduced accessions. The value in each circle represents nucleotide diversity for this group, and the value on each line indicates population divergence between the two groups
Phenotypic variation for five fiber quality traits on 249 sea island cotton accessions
| Trait | Environmenta | Min | Max | Mean | SD | CV (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL (mm) | FL17-C | 31.15 | 39.05 | 36.11 | 1.67 | 4.62 |
| FL17-S | 31.25 | 38.60 | 35.91 | 1.53 | 4.27 | |
| FL18-C | 30.31 | 38.45 | 35.82 | 1.62 | 4.52 | |
| FL18-S | 29.35 | 39.68 | 35.69 | 1.91 | 5.35 | |
| FL-C-BLUP | 25.75 | 41.14 | 35.96 | 3.11 | 8.66 | |
| FL-S-BLUP | 25.14 | 41.50 | 35.80 | 3.22 | 8.98 | |
| FS (cN/tex) | FS17-C | 29.47 | 45.47 | 37.23 | 3.72 | 10.00 |
| FS17-S | 30.90 | 46.30 | 38.07 | 3.25 | 8.53 | |
| FS18-C | 28.29 | 48.10 | 37.03 | 4.04 | 10.91 | |
| FS18-S | 31.47 | 47.20 | 39.70 | 3.81 | 9.61 | |
| FS-C-BLUP | 21.31 | 54.81 | 37.13 | 7.28 | 19.61 | |
| FS-S-BLUP | 23.92 | 51.46 | 38.89 | 6.59 | 16.96 | |
| MIC | MIC17-C | 3.38 | 4.99 | 4.19 | 0.27 | 6.51 |
| MIC17-S | 3.62 | 4.98 | 4.25 | 0.27 | 6.28 | |
| MIC18-C | 3.11 | 5.12 | 4.02 | 0.33 | 8.31 | |
| MIC18-S | 3.10 | 5.23 | 4.11 | 0.33 | 8.13 | |
| MIC-C-BLUP | 2.69 | 5.74 | 4.11 | 0.53 | 12.87 | |
| MIC-S-BLUP | 2.69 | 5.92 | 4.18 | 0.52 | 12.45 | |
| FU (%) | FU17-C | 83.35 | 88.13 | 86.28 | 0.90 | 1.04 |
| FU17-S | 84.40 | 88.65 | 87.07 | 0.81 | 0.93 | |
| FU18-C | 82.56 | 87.98 | 85.64 | 0.91 | 1.06 | |
| FU18-S | 81.75 | 86.55 | 84.97 | 0.81 | 0.95 | |
| FU-C-BLUP | 81.16 | 89.67 | 85.96 | 1.51 | 1.76 | |
| FU-S-BLUP | 81.40 | 88.46 | 86.02 | 1.34 | 1.56 | |
| FE (%) | FE17-C | 6.62 | 7.11 | 6.89 | 0.10 | 1.48 |
| FE17-S | 6.52 | 6.95 | 6.74 | 0.08 | 1.21 | |
| FE18-C | 6.65 | 7.07 | 6.88 | 0.07 | 1.08 | |
| FE18-S | 6.73 | 7.12 | 6.89 | 0.07 | 1.04 | |
| FE-C-BLUP | 6.52 | 7.18 | 6.89 | 0.13 | 1.88 | |
| FE-S-BLUP | 6.53 | 7.02 | 6.82 | 0.10 | 1.42 |
a17, 18 and BLUP indicated the phenotype data in 2017, 2018 and BLUP evaluated in the same environment, C: normal condition; S: salt condition
FL fiber length, FS fiber strength, MIC fiber micronaire, FU fiber uniformity, FE fiber elongation
Fig. 2Comparison of different phenotypic data under normal and salt environments. a. Fiber length (FL). b. fiber strength (FS). c. fiber micronaire (MIC) d. fiber elongation (FE). e. fiber uniformity (FU). Significant difference of single trait was calculated with paired-samples t-tests. ** indicates a significance level of 0.01
Identification on stable QTL related to five fiber quality traits by multi-loci MLM model
| Traita | Environment | Number of QTL | QTL counts |
|---|---|---|---|
| FL | Normal | 9 | 45 |
| Salt | 9 | 41 | |
| Total | 11 | 86 | |
| FS | Normal | 9 | 52 |
| Salt | 8 | 49 | |
| Total | 11 | 101 | |
| MIC | Normal | 10 | 35 |
| Salt | 7 | 23 | |
| Total | 13 | 58 | |
| FU | Normal | 2 | 12 |
| Salt | 4 | 26 | |
| Total | 4 | 38 | |
| FE | Normal | 10 | 36 |
| Salt | 11 | 28 | |
| Total | 17 | 64 | |
| Total | 34 | 347 |
aFL fiber length, FS fiber strength, MIC fiber micronaire, FU fiber uniformity, FE fiber elongation
Fig. 3Identification of the stable QTLs associated with the five fiber quality traits in different conditions. a. Numbers of QTLs on At and Dt sub-genome. b. Numbers of QTLs on 26 chromosomes. c. Venn diagram of stable QTLs of five fiber quality traits under normal and salt environments
Fig. 4Contribution of QTL TM6004 to fiber quality traits. a. Manhattan plots of SNPs around TM6004 for the best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) of five traits. The location of a QTN for A/C related to GB_A03G0335. b. Box plots for the phenotypic values of QTN TM6004