Literature DB >> 32570874

Genetic Variants of the PLCXD3 Gene Are Associated with Risk of Metabolic Syndrome in the Emirati Population.

Hayat Aljaibeji1, Abdul Khader Mohammed1, Sami Alkayyali2, Mahmood Yaseen Hachim3, Hind Hasswan1, Waseem El-Huneidi4, Jalal Taneera1,4, Nabil Sulaiman5,6.   

Abstract

Phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C X domain 3 (PLCXD3) has been shown to influence pancreatic β-cell function by disrupting insulin signaling. Herein, we investigated two genetic variants in the PLCXD3 gene in relation to type 2 diabetes (T2D) or metabolic syndrome (MetS) in the Emirati population. In total, 556 adult Emirati individuals (306 T2D and 256 controls) were genotyped for two PLCXD3 variants (rs319013 and rs9292806) using TaqMan genotyping assays. The frequency distribution of minor homozygous CC genotype of rs9292806 and GG genotype of rs319013 were significantly higher in subjects with MetS compared to Non-MetS (p < 0.01). The minor homozygous rs9292806-CC and rs319013-GG genotypes were significantly associated with increased risk of MetS (adj. OR 2.92; 95% CI 1.61-5.3; p < 0.001) (adj. OR 2.62; 95% CI 1.42-4.83; p = 0.002), respectively. However, no associations were detected with T2D. In healthy participants, the homozygous minor genotypes of both rs9292806 and rs319013 were significantly higher fasting glucose (adj. p < 0.005), HbA1c (adj. p < 0.005) and lower HDL-cholesterol (adj. p < 0.05) levels. Data from T2D Knowledge Portal database disclosed a nominal association of rs319013 and rs9292806 with T2D and components of MetS. Bioinformatics prediction analysis showed a deleterious effect of rs9292806 on the regulatory regions of PLCXD3. In conclusion, this study identifies rs319013 and rs9292806 variants of PLCXD3 as additional risk factors for MetS in the Emirati population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMI; CJD; HbA1c; LDL; MAF; MetS; SBP; body mass index; diastolic blood pressure; metabolic syndrome; minor allele frequency; phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C X domain; single-nucleotide polymorphism; triglycerides; type 2 diabetes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32570874      PMCID: PMC7349663          DOI: 10.3390/genes11060665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes (Basel)        ISSN: 2073-4425            Impact factor:   4.096


1. Introduction

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a major health problem, referring to cluster risk factors that include obesity, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia and hypertension [1,2,3]. Components of MetS, individually or collectively, increase the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) and cardiovascular (CVD) diseases [4,5,6]. The International Diabetes Federation (IDF) estimates that a quarter of the adult population worldwide suffers from MetS [1]. The national estimates of MetS among adults in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) have reached to 40 percent [7], with nearly 75 percent of the population either overweight or obese [8]. Aside from lifestyle factors and physical inactivity, genetics is considered as an essential risk factor for metabolic syndrome [9]. Recently, we showed that the expression of PLCXD3, a member of the PI-PLC family, is downregulated in human diabetic islets, inversely correlated with HbA1c and positively correlated with insulin secretion [10,11]. Further investigations revealed that PLCXD3 is involved in insulin signaling and glucose sensing, suggesting that PLCXD3 might be regarded as a candidate gene for pre-diabetes and metabolic syndrome. Despite the role of PLCXD3 in β-cell function, until now no studies have linked genetic variants in the PLCXD3 gene with T2D, MetS or its related traits. Thus, the present study aims to investigate the association of two intronic SNPs “rs319013 and rs9292806” with T2D or MetS in the Emirati population.

2. Materials

2.1. Study Population

In total, 556 unrelated adult Emirati participants (306 T2D (120 males and 186 females)) and 256 controls (119 males and 137 females) were selected from two different cohorts were included for this study. The first cohort consisted of participants from UAE national diabetes and lifestyle study (UAEDIAB) that includes participants living in Dubai, Sharjah, and the Northern Emirates collected from door to door visits as described previously [12,13,14]. The second cohort includes participants from the All-New Diabetes in Sharjah and Ajman (ANDISA) study were patients recruited to this study based on their routine visit to the endocrinology clinic at the university hospital of Sharjah. The initial study was approved by the UAE ministry of health (MOHAP/DXB/SUBC/No.14/2017) and University of Sharjah ethics committee. A written informed consent with an extensive interview and a standard questionnaire were obtained from all the participants. Using the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) criteria for metabolic syndrome [3], the studied participants were re-classified into MetS and Non-MetS. The features for MetS include a waist circumference ≥ 102 cm for men and ≥ 88 cm for women, blood pressure ≥ 130/85, fasting plasma glucose levels ≥ 5.6 mmol/L, HDL-cholesterol < 40 mg/dL for men and < 50 mg/dL for women and triglycerides ≥ 1.7 mmol/L. The MetS is defined as central obesity plus other two factors. For participants without waist circumference data, BMI ≥30 kg/m2 were assumed as central obesity. Subjects who did not match the employed criteria for MetS selection were considered as Non-MetS. All participants were requested to provide information on demographics, medical and family history of diabetes and current medications. Anthropometric parameters, including height, weight, mean systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure (average of three readings) were obtained from all the participants. Body mass index (BMI) values were computed by dividing weight in kilograms by height in meter square. Fasting blood samples were collected from participating individuals for a glucose test, HbA1c, and lipid profile. The same blood samples were used later for DNA extraction.

2.2. Genotyping Analysis

The genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood using pure link genomic DNA mini Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). DNA concentration and purity were checked by Nano-drop 2000 C spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, NC, USA). Two tagging SNPs (Intronic variants) in PLCXD3 gene rs319013 and rs9292806 have been selected for genotyping. Both rs319013 and rs9292806 were in very high linkage disequilibrium, for example, in the north European population [15] r2 = 0.977 and D′ = 1.0 (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Data from 1000 Genomes Phase 3 showed that the combined population minor allele frequency of rs319013 is 0.43 and 0.44 for rs9292806. The distance between the SNPs is about 34-kilo base pairs (kbp) (https://jan2020.archive.ensembl.org/Homo_sapiens/Location/LD?db=core;focus=variation;pop1=373514;r=5:41382400-41416900;v=rs319013;vdb=variation;vf=49567201). The genotyping was performed by allelic discrimination real-time PCR using TaqMan assays for genotyping (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The assay IDs are C_805815_10 for rs319013 and C__30418796_20 for rs9292806. All qPCR amplifications were carried out in a final reaction volume of 10 µL containing 1X firepol universal probe master mix (Solis Biodyne, Tartu, Estonia), 1X TaqMan genotyping assays, and 50 ng of template DNA. All amplifications and detections were conducted on genomic DNA in 96-well PCR plates using a QuantStudio three Real-time PCR (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). A minimum of two non-template control was included in each run. Thermal cycling was initiated with pre-PCR read followed by a denaturation step of 10 min at 95 °C followed by 50 cycles of 15 s at 95 °C, 60 s at 60 °C. Allelic discrimination analysis was performed using QuantStudio Real-Time PCR Software autocaller (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA).
Figure 1

Linkage disequilibrium rs319013 and rs9292806 (D′ = 1.0).

Figure 2

Linkage disequilibrium rs319013 and rs9292806 (r2 = 0.977).

2.3. Statistical Analyses

All the statistical analyses were carried out with SPSS version 26 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). The Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium was tested using a Chi-square test. Linkage disequilibrium was calculated using haploview. Haplotype frequencies were estimated by an Expectation–Maximization algorithm (EM algorithm) with haploview software [16]. The most common haplotype was used as the reference. The non-Gaussian variables are presented as median with interquartile range. An independent sample t-test was used to compare the difference between the groups, while the Mann–Whitney U test was used for comparison of nonparametric variables. The genotype frequency differences between the categorized group (control vs. T2D or Non-MetS vs. MetS) were tested using a chi-square test. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by multinomial logistic regression with age and gender as covariates. The major allele was employed as the reference genotype. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare different genotypic groups with anthropometric and biochemical parameters followed by application of Bonferroni post hoc test, while univariate general linear model (GLM) was used for adjusting covariates such as age and gender. The significance was set at p-value <0.05. All the continuous normal variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD).

3. Results

The anthropometric and clinical variables of the studied participants for control vs. T2D groups were shown in Table 1 and Non-MetS vs. Mets are presented in Table 2. Measurements of BMI, waist circumference SBP, HbA1c, fasting glucose and triglycerides were significantly higher in T2D and MetS groups when compared to controls (p < 0.001), while levels of lipids profile (total cholesterol, LDL- and HDL-cholesterol) were, in general, lower.
Table 1

Anthropometric and clinical characteristics of the studied groups.

ParametersControl (n = 256)T2DM (n = 306) p Value
N (M/F)119/137120/186
Age (Years)43.3 ± 12.754.4 ± 10.8<0.0001
BMI (kg/m2)28.8 ± 5.231.2 ± 5.8<0.0001
Waist circumference96.4 ± 12.9103.5± 12.60.001
SBP (mmHg)125.3 ± 17.9132.1 ± 16.2<0.0001
DBP (mmHg)77.6 ± 10.777.7 ± 10.30.89
Glucose (mmol/L)5.35 ± 0.6610.0 ± 3.48<0.0001
HbA1c (%)5.44 ± 0.488.47 ± 1.51<0.0001
Total Cholesterol (mmol/L)5.0 ± 0.944.6 ± 1.36<0.0001
HDL-Cholesterol (mmol/L)1.39 ± 0.451.24 ± 0.36<0.0001
LDL-Cholesterol (mmol/L)3.20± 0.822.78 ± 1.06<0.0001
Triglycerides (mmol/L) #1.1 (0.81–1.57)1.36 (1.05–1.92)<0.0001

Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation for normal continuous variables; # denotes continuous variables with non-Gaussian distribution and presented as median (1st–3rd quartile). Independent sample t-test and a Mann–Whitney U test were used to test differences between control and T2DM groups. Note: Waist circumference data available for 150 participants.

Table 2

Anthropometric and clinical characteristics of the studied groups.

ParametersNon-MetS (n = 341)MetS (n = 215)p Value
N (M/F)161/18074/141
Age (Years)46.5 ± 13.753.8 ± 10.1<0.0001
BMI (kg/m2)26.9 ± 4.034.9 ± 4.3<0.0001
Waist circumference93.5 ± 11.9109.2 ± 8.8<0.0001
SBP (mmHg)125.2 ± 16.6132.7 ± 16.7<0.0001
DBP (mmHg)76.3 ± 10.780.0 ± 9.6<0.0001
Glucose (mmol/L)7.0 ± 3.028.1 ± 3.55<0.0001
HbA1c6.62 ± 1.827.79 ± 1.79<0.0001
Total Cholesterol (mmol/L)4.84 ± 1.224.67 ± 1.170.15
HDL-Cholesterol (mmol/L)1.37 ± 0.441.22 ± 0.34<0.0001
LDL-Cholesterol (mmol/L)3.01± 1.022.90 ± 0.930.08
Triglycerides (mmol/L) #1.12 (0.84–1.68)1.41 (1.06–2.14)0.001

Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation for normal continuous variables; # denotes continuous variables with non-Gaussian distribution and presented as median (1st quartile-3rd quartile). Independent sample t-test and a Mann-Whitney U test were used to test differences between control and T2DM groups. Note: Waist circumference data available for 150 participants.

The genotype frequency distribution of both rs319013 and rs9292806 in the control and Non-MetS group were consistent with the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (p > 0.05). The genotype frequency distribution of both rs319013 and rs9292806 between T2D and control study groups are described in Table 3. No significant difference in genotype frequencies was found between control and T2D group. However, the genotype frequencies of rs319013 and rs9292806 were significantly different between MetS and Non-MetS subjects (Table 3, p < 0.05). The frequency of homozygous CC genotype of rs9292806 was significantly higher in individuals with MetS than Non-MetS (MetS 18% vs. Non-MetS 8%) (Table 3). Similarly, the frequency of homozygous GG genotype of rs319013 was significantly higher in individuals with MetS than Non-MetS (Mets 16% vs. controls 8.1%). The association of the PLCXD3 gene variants towards a predisposition to T2D or MetS was analyzed by multiple logistic regression considering age and gender as potential covariates. Our results indicated that both of the studied SNPs were not associated with risk of T2D (Table 4). However, the homozygous CC genotype of rs9292806 and homozygous GG genotype of rs319013 were significantly associated with risk of MetS (adj. OR 2.92; 95% CI 1.61–5.3; p < 0.001) (adj. OR 2.62; 95% CI 1.42–4.83; p = 0.002), respectively (Table 4). Furthermore, we investigated the association of the two SNPs rs319013 and rs9292806 with anthropometric parameters in control subjects. As shown in Table 5, the homozygous genotypes of both rs319013 (GG) and rs9292806 (CC) showed statistically significant higher levels of fasting glucose levels (adj. p < 0.05), HbA1c (adj. p < 0.01) and lower HDL-cholesterol (adj. p <0.01) levels (Table 5). Linkage disequilibrium analysis of our studied population indicated both rs319013 and rs9292806 were in very high linkage disequilibrium (r2 = 0.972) (Figure 3). The frequency distribution of rs319013_G and rs9292806_C (i.e., GC) haplotype is more common MetS group compared to Non-MetS group, thus GC haplotype is associated with increased risk of MetS (OR 1.46; 95% CI 1.01–2.14); p = 0.047) (Table 6). However, no such differences were found in control vs. T2DM group (Table 6).
Table 3

Genotype frequency distribution of PLCXD3 SNPs in Control vs. T2DM and Non-MetS vs. MetS subjects.

Control N (%)T2DM N (%)Chi2 p ValueNon-MetS N (%)MetS N (%)Chi2 p Value
rs9292806
GG125 (49.0)169 (56.1)0.21188 (55.5)104 (49.3)0.002
CG99 (38.8)97 (32.2)124 (36.6)69 (32.7)
CC31 (12.2)35 (11.6)27 (8)38 (18.0)
rs319013
TT124 (49.2)171 (57.0)0.18187 (56.0)106 (50.0)0.015
GT97 (38.5)98 (32.7)120 (35.9)72 (34.0)
GG31 (12.3)31 (10.3)27 (8.1)34 (16.0)

Genotype frequency differences between Control vs. T2DM and Non-MetS vs. MetS groups were tested using Chi-square test.

Table 4

Odds ratios of genotypes the PLCXD3 SNPs in control vs. T2DM and Non-MetS vs. MetS groups.

T2D OR (95 % CI)p ValueT2D Adj OR (95 % CI) Adj p ValueMetS OR (95 % CI)p ValueMetS Adj OR (95 % CI) Adj p Value
rs9292806
GG 1-1-1-1-
CG 0.72 (0.50–1.10)0.080.67 (0.43–1.03)0.071.01 (0.69–1.47)0.971.03 (0.69–1.55)0.85
CC 0.83 (0.49–1.42)0.510.80 (0.42–1.49)0.472.54 (1.47–4.40) 0.001 2.92 (1.61–5.30)<0.001
rs319013
TT 1-1-1-1-
GT 0.73 (0.51–1.05)0.100.66 (0.36–1.02)0.071.06 (0.72–1.54)0.771.08 (0.72–1.63)0.67
GG 0.72 (0.42–1.25)0.250.69 (0.36–1.33)0.282.22 (1.27–3.88) 0.005 2.62 (1.42–4.83)0.002

Odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals for genotypes were calculated using multinomial logistic regression analyses. Adj OR denotes ORs after adjusting for age and gender. The most common genotype was used as the reference genotype. Significant p values are bolded.

Table 5

Distribution of anthropometric and biochemical parameters according to PLCXD3 SNPs in control participants (n = 256).

rs9292806rs319013
VariablesGG (125)CG (99)CC (29)p Valuep adjTT (124)GT (97)GG (29)p Valuep adj
Age (Years) 43.5 ± 13.242.6 ± 12.344.8 ± 12.20.72-43.1 ± 13.542.8 ± 12.144.8 ± 12.30.75-
BMI (kg/m2) 28.9 ± 5.728.4 ± 4.629.7 ± 4.70.510.5728.9 ± 5.728.3 ± 4.629.5 ± 4.70.44-
Waist Circumference 97.2 ± 12.493.1 ± 14.2102.8 ± 7.3 b0.030.1697.1 ± 12.493.0 ± 14.1102.7 ± 7.3 b0.030.16
SBP (mmHg) 123.0 ± 16.0126.0 ± 18.2133.1 ± 21.9 a0.020.20122.5 ± 17.9126.2 ± 18.3133.5 ± 22.2 a0.01 0.16
DBP (mmHg) 76.1 ± 9.878.7 ± 11.480.3 ± 11.20.070.1976.2 ± 9.878.6 ± 11.779.9 ± 11.20.120.34
Glucose (mmol/L) 5.29 ± 0.585.30 ± 0.635.75 ± 0.85 a,b0.0060.0035.30 ± 0.585.42 ± 0.645.72 ± 0.87 a,b0.0130.009
HbA1c (%) 5.40 ± 0.435.42 ± 0.455.75 ± 0.67 a,b0.0020.0045.40 ± 0.435.41 ± 0.46 a5.76 ± 0.67 a,b0.0010.003
Total Chol (mmol/L) 4.91 ± 0.905.0 ± 0.945.31 ± 1.060.160.204.92 ± 0.904.98 ± 0.945.31 ± 1.060.170.22
HDL-Chol (mmol/L) 1.50 ± 0.511.34 ± 0.35 a1.12 ± 0.34 a,b0.0010.021.49 ± 0.511.34 ± 0.35 a1.15 ± 0.37 a,b0.0020.03
LDL-Chol (mmol/L) 3.12 ± 0.763.23 ± 0.853.45 ± 0.920.170.293.13 ± 0.763.24 ± 0.853.42 ± 0.950.250.37
Triglycerides (mmol/L) # 1.29 ± 0.841.25 ± 0.70 1.98 ± 1.41 a,b0.020.321.30 ± 0.841.26 ± 0.711.90 ± 1.440.100.73

Data presented as mean ± standard deviation. # denotes values were log-transformed prior to analysis. p adj indicates p values after adjusting for age and gender. Superscript a indicates significantly different from homozygous major genotype group (GG-rs9229806 or TT-rs319013). Superscript a,b significantly different from homozygous major and heterozygote genotype groups. Note: Waist circumference data available for 97 participants.

Figure 3

Linkage disequilibrium (r2 = 0.972) analysis between rs319013 and rs9292806 in the Emirati population, r2 indicates the squared correlation coefficient between two SNPs.

Table 6

Haplotype frequency of PLCXD3 variants (rs319013, rs9292806) in Control vs. T2DM and Non-MetS vs. MetS subjects.

Haplotypes.Haplotype CountHaplotype FrequenciesOR (95 % CI)p Value
Control T2DM Control T2DM
TG175 222 0.680.731
GC81 84 0.320.270.82 (0.56–1.18)0.28
Non-MetS MetS Non-MetS MetS
TG252 142 0.740.661-
GC89 73 0.260.341.46 (1.01–2.14)0.047

3.1. Association of rs319013 and rs9292806 across GWAS Datasets with T2D and Related Traits

The T2D Knowledge Portal (T2DKP; contains 88 datasets and 198 traits) database (www.type2diabetesgenetics.org) was used to explore GWAS datasets for the association of rs319013 and rs9292806 with T2D and other traits. As shown in Table 7, we detected nominally significant associations (p < 0.05) between the variant allele of PLCXD3 rs319013 with BMI, creatinine, diastolic blood pressure, eGFR-creat (serum creatinine), HbA1c, height, LDL cholesterol, pericardial adipose tissue volume, triglycerides and T2D in several datasets. However, the most significant associations were observed with BMI (p < 0.00066) in BioBank Japan GWAS, males dataset and T2D (p < 0.00064) in AMP T2D-GENES T2D exome sequence analysis dataset. The variant allele rs9292806 was nominally associated (p < 0.05) with adiponectin, BMI, eGFR-creat, height, pericardial adipose tissue volume, triglycerides, T2D (Table 8). Likewise, the most significant associations of rs9292806 were observed with BMI (p < 0.0008) in BioBank Japan GWAS, male dataset and height (p < 0.006) in GIANT UK Biobank GWAS dataset. These data provide more evidence for the association of rs319013 and rs9292806 in MetS disorders.
Table 7

Association of rs319013 across all datasets and traits included in the Type2Diabetes knowledge Portal.

TraitDatasetp-ValueDirection of EffectOdds RatioMA FrequencyEffectSamplesReferences
BMIBioBank Japan GWAS, males0.00663 −0.013285894[17]
CreatinineGoDartsAffymetrix GWAS0.044 0.379−0.05462917[18]
Diastolic blood pressure13K exome sequence analysis0.0186 −0.032612954[19]
eGFR-creat (serum creatinine)Hoorn DCS 20180.029 0.37−0.05513414[20]
eGFR-creat (serum creatinine)SUMMIT Diabetic Kidney Disease GWAS0.041 −0.8240340[21]
HbA1cMAGIC HbA1c GWAS: Europeans0.0425 123665[22]
HeightGIANT UK Biobank GWAS0.0015 0.004779564[23]
LDL cholesterolBioBank Japan GWAS0.0455 0.0105191764[17]
Pericardial adipose tissue volumeVATGen GWAS0.012 18332[22]
TriglyceridesBioBank Japan GWAS0.0485 0.0085191764[17]
Type 2 diabetesAMP T2D-GENES T2D exome sequence analysis0.006420.954 49147[19]
Table 8

Association of rs9292806 across all datasets and traits included in the Type2Diabetes knowledge Portal.

TraitDatasetp-ValueDirection of EffectOdds RatioMA FrequencyEffectSamplesReferences
AdiponectinADIPOGen GWAS0.0425 0.03330.0097645891[15]
BMIBioBankJapan GWAS, males0.00898 0.433−0.013185894[17]
eGFR-creat (serum creatinine)Hoorn DCS 20180.028 0.361−0.05733414[20]
eGFR-creat (serum creatinine)SUMMIT Diabetic Kidney Disease GWAS0.035 0.38−0.864034[21]
HeightGIANT UK Biobank GWAS0.0062 0.0041795640[23]
Pericardial adipose tissue volumeVATGen GWAS0.016 18332[22]
TriglyceridesBioBank Japan GWAS0.0369 0.430.00962191764[17]
Type 2 diabetesUK Biobank T2D GWAS (DIAMANTE-Europeans 2018)0.0320.9770.4 442817[24]

3.2. Prediction the Effect of rs319013 and rs9292806 on the Function of PLCXD3

To predict the possible consequences of the examined SNPs on the function or expression of the PLCXD3, the chromosomal location for two PLCXD3 variants (rs319013 and rs9292806), reference allele and altered allele were used in online tools “PredictSNP2” (https://loschmidt.chemi.muni.cz/predictsnp2/) [25]. PredictSNP2 is a unified platform for accurately evaluating SNP effects by exploiting the different characteristics of variants in distinct genomic regions. As shown in Figure 4, only rs9292806 showed a deleterious effect on regulatory regions using PriedictSNP2, CADD and FATHMM prediction tools with an expected accuracy of 91%, 67 % and 82 %, respectively.
Figure 4

Prediction the effect of the rs9292806 of function and expression of PLCXD3 using the PredictSNP2 platform.

4. Discussion and Conclusions

It is well established that MetS increase the risk for cardiovascular disease, T2D and other conditions include dyslipidemia, high blood pressure, excess body fat around the waist and high fasting plasma glucose [26,27,28]. MetS is ascribed to an interaction between genetic and environmental factors like obesity and lifestyle [29,30,31]. As the prevalence of MetS disease is expected to escalate globally, identification of genetic markers could be an early prediction to minimize the risk of MetS, T2D and cardiovascular diseases. In this study, we examined the association of genetic variants of the PLCXD3 gene (rs319013 and rs9292806) with T2D or MetS among UAE nationals. Our results revealed the presence of an association between the homozygous minor genotypes CC-rs9292806 and GG-rs319013 with increased risk of MetS but not T2D (Table 4). GWAS data from T2DKP revealed a significant association of rs9292806 and rs319013 with T2D, BMI and other MetS components in European and Japanese populations (Table 7 and Table 8). The finding that both variants have similar association is not surprising as both displayed a very high linkage disequilibrium (Figure 1 and Figure 2). The association of PLCXD3 variants with fasting glucose or HbA1c in our control subjects (Table 5) is supported by a previously published data set [17,22]. While other reports showed no association between PLCXD3 (rs319013) with T2D [32,33]. Other datasets indicated a statistically significant association of rs319013 with T2D, as shown in Table 7 and Table 8 [19,24,34,35]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report investigating the association of genetic variants in the PLCXD3 gene with T2D or MetS, particularly in the UAE population. In a previous study, genetic variants in the PLCXD3 were linked with an early onset bipolar disorder vulnerability and olfactory sensory neurons and CJD [36,37,38]. The latter finding was disputed by another report [39]. Moreover, a mutation in the PLCXD3 gene was associated with rapid-onset obesity with hypothalamic dysfunction, hypoventilation and autonomy dysregulation (ROHHAD) [40]. The latter finding is in line with the association of rs319013 and rs9292806 with BMI (Table 7 and Table 8). PI-PLC is an enzyme that hydrolyzes the membrane phospholipid phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) to inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol in response to external stimuli such as hormones, neurotransmitters and growth factors [41]. Each PI-PLC subtype contains a well-conserved catalytic domain of separate X- and Y-box. In contrast, the PLXCD isoforms (PLCXD1, PLCXD2 and PLCXD3) have only the catalytic X domain with distinct functions, various tissue distribution and cellular localization [42]. PLCXD3 is highly expressed in human pancreatic islets [10], significantly downregulated in diabetic islets, correlated positively with insulin secretion and negatively with HbA1c as well as BMI [10]. This is in line with our data showing the homozygous genotype of rs9292806 (CC) and rs319013 (GG) have a significantly higher glycemic profile represented by fasting blood glucose and HbA1c in control subjects. The mechanisms by which these genetic variants affect glucose hemeostasis is not clear. However, it can be speculated that these variants influence the expression of PLCXD3, in turn, PLCXD3 affects the glycemic profile. Despite that fact that rs319013 is intronic, it lies at the junction of intron 1 and exon 2 in close proximity to the splice site motifs [36,39]. As exon 2 codes for the active structural domain of PLCXD3 protein, hence any modification to the functioning of the spliceosome at this particular region might impact the activity of the PLCXD3 protein [36,39] and might be influencing the expression of PLCXD3 by altering the mRNA stability or binding of transcription factors. In line with this hypothesis, we showed a bioinformatics tool that rs9292806 influences the regulatory regions of PLCXD3. A possible validation for this finding is to investigate the mRNA expression of PLCXD3 among our participants’ samples with different genotypes. Unfortunately, due to the shortage of RNA materials, we could not perform such analysis. We believe that it is crucial to replicate the association of the studied variants as well as other variants within the PLCXD3 gene in different ethnic populations. More, the expression level of PLCXD3 needs to be explored in various tissues among different pathological conditions related to metabolic syndrome such as fat, heart, muscle, and brain tissue. In conclusion, rs9292806 and rs319013 in the PLCXD3 gene are associated with MetS but not T2D in the Emirati population. The finding emphasizes the power of genetic susceptibility to use as biomarkers for prevention strategy of MetS in UAE. Further studies with larger sample sizes and subgroups are warranted for validation and replication.
  42 in total

1.  Novel approach to systematic random sampling in population surveys: Lessons from the United Arab Emirates National Diabetes Study (UAEDIAB).

Authors:  Nabil Sulaiman; Salah Albadawi; Salah Abusnana; Mahmoud Fikri; Abdulrazzag Madani; Maisoon Mairghani; Fatheya Alawadi; Paul Zimmet; Jonathan Shaw
Journal:  J Diabetes       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 4.006

2.  Variants of endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene are associated with components of metabolic syndrome in an Arab population.

Authors:  Khalid M Alkharfy; Nasser M Al-Daghri; Omar S Al-Attas; Majed S Alokail; Abdul Khader Mohammed; Benjamin Vinodson; Mario Clerici; Usamah Kazmi; Tajamul Hussain; Hossam M Draz
Journal:  Endocr J       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 2.349

3.  Identification of novel genes for glucose metabolism based upon expression pattern in human islets and effect on insulin secretion and glycemia.

Authors:  Jalal Taneera; Joao Fadista; Emma Ahlqvist; David Atac; Emilia Ottosson-Laakso; Claes B Wollheim; Leif Groop
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  Transferability of type 2 diabetes implicated loci in multi-ethnic cohorts from Southeast Asia.

Authors:  Xueling Sim; Rick Twee-Hee Ong; Chen Suo; Wan-Ting Tay; Jianjun Liu; Daniel Peng-Keat Ng; Michael Boehnke; Kee-Seng Chia; Tien-Yin Wong; Mark Seielstad; Yik-Ying Teo; E-Shyong Tai
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 5.917

5.  Diabetes risk score in the United Arab Emirates: a screening tool for the early detection of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Nabil Sulaiman; Ibrahim Mahmoud; Amal Hussein; Salah Elbadawi; Salah Abusnana; Paul Zimmet; Jonathan Shaw
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2018-03-29

6.  Positive Association of Metabolic Syndrome with a Single Nucleotide Polymorphism of Syndecan-3 (rs2282440) in the Taiwanese Population.

Authors:  Betty Chia-Chen Chang; Lee-Ching Hwang; Wei-Hsin Huang
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.257

7.  A study assessing the association of glycated hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) associated variants with HbA1C, chronic kidney disease and diabetic retinopathy in populations of Asian ancestry.

Authors:  Peng Chen; Rick Twee-Hee Ong; Wan-Ting Tay; Xueling Sim; Mohammad Ali; Haiyan Xu; Chen Suo; Jianjun Liu; Kee-Seng Chia; Eranga Vithana; Terri L Young; Tin Aung; Wei-Yen Lim; Chiea-Chuen Khor; Ching-Yu Cheng; Tien-Yin Wong; Yik-Ying Teo; E-Shyong Tai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Genetic fine mapping and genomic annotation defines causal mechanisms at type 2 diabetes susceptibility loci.

Authors:  Kyle J Gaulton; Teresa Ferreira; Yeji Lee; Anne Raimondo; Reedik Mägi; Michael E Reschen; Anubha Mahajan; Adam Locke; N William Rayner; Neil Robertson; Robert A Scott; Inga Prokopenko; Laura J Scott; Todd Green; Thomas Sparso; Dorothee Thuillier; Loic Yengo; Harald Grallert; Simone Wahl; Mattias Frånberg; Rona J Strawbridge; Hans Kestler; Himanshu Chheda; Lewin Eisele; Stefan Gustafsson; Valgerdur Steinthorsdottir; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Lu Qi; Lennart C Karssen; Elisabeth M van Leeuwen; Sara M Willems; Man Li; Han Chen; Christian Fuchsberger; Phoenix Kwan; Clement Ma; Michael Linderman; Yingchang Lu; Soren K Thomsen; Jana K Rundle; Nicola L Beer; Martijn van de Bunt; Anil Chalisey; Hyun Min Kang; Benjamin F Voight; Gonçalo R Abecasis; Peter Almgren; Damiano Baldassarre; Beverley Balkau; Rafn Benediktsson; Matthias Blüher; Heiner Boeing; Lori L Bonnycastle; Erwin P Bottinger; Noël P Burtt; Jason Carey; Guillaume Charpentier; Peter S Chines; Marilyn C Cornelis; David J Couper; Andrew T Crenshaw; Rob M van Dam; Alex S F Doney; Mozhgan Dorkhan; Sarah Edkins; Johan G Eriksson; Tonu Esko; Elodie Eury; João Fadista; Jason Flannick; Pierre Fontanillas; Caroline Fox; Paul W Franks; Karl Gertow; Christian Gieger; Bruna Gigante; Omri Gottesman; George B Grant; Niels Grarup; Christopher J Groves; Maija Hassinen; Christian T Have; Christian Herder; Oddgeir L Holmen; Astradur B Hreidarsson; Steve E Humphries; David J Hunter; Anne U Jackson; Anna Jonsson; Marit E Jørgensen; Torben Jørgensen; Wen-Hong L Kao; Nicola D Kerrison; Leena Kinnunen; Norman Klopp; Augustine Kong; Peter Kovacs; Peter Kraft; Jasmina Kravic; Cordelia Langford; Karin Leander; Liming Liang; Peter Lichtner; Cecilia M Lindgren; Eero Lindholm; Allan Linneberg; Ching-Ti Liu; Stéphane Lobbens; Jian'an Luan; Valeriya Lyssenko; Satu Männistö; Olga McLeod; Julia Meyer; Evelin Mihailov; Ghazala Mirza; Thomas W Mühleisen; Martina Müller-Nurasyid; Carmen Navarro; Markus M Nöthen; Nikolay N Oskolkov; Katharine R Owen; Domenico Palli; Sonali Pechlivanis; Leena Peltonen; John R B Perry; Carl G P Platou; Michael Roden; Douglas Ruderfer; Denis Rybin; Yvonne T van der Schouw; Bengt Sennblad; Gunnar Sigurðsson; Alena Stančáková; Gerald Steinbach; Petter Storm; Konstantin Strauch; Heather M Stringham; Qi Sun; Barbara Thorand; Emmi Tikkanen; Anke Tonjes; Joseph Trakalo; Elena Tremoli; Tiinamaija Tuomi; Roman Wennauer; Steven Wiltshire; Andrew R Wood; Eleftheria Zeggini; Ian Dunham; Ewan Birney; Lorenzo Pasquali; Jorge Ferrer; Ruth J F Loos; Josée Dupuis; Jose C Florez; Eric Boerwinkle; James S Pankow; Cornelia van Duijn; Eric Sijbrands; James B Meigs; Frank B Hu; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Kari Stefansson; Timo A Lakka; Rainer Rauramaa; Michael Stumvoll; Nancy L Pedersen; Lars Lind; Sirkka M Keinanen-Kiukaanniemi; Eeva Korpi-Hyövälti; Timo E Saaristo; Juha Saltevo; Johanna Kuusisto; Markku Laakso; Andres Metspalu; Raimund Erbel; Karl-Heinz Jöcke; Susanne Moebus; Samuli Ripatti; Veikko Salomaa; Erik Ingelsson; Bernhard O Boehm; Richard N Bergman; Francis S Collins; Karen L Mohlke; Heikki Koistinen; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Kristian Hveem; Inger Njølstad; Panagiotis Deloukas; Peter J Donnelly; Timothy M Frayling; Andrew T Hattersley; Ulf de Faire; Anders Hamsten; Thomas Illig; Annette Peters; Stephane Cauchi; Rob Sladek; Philippe Froguel; Torben Hansen; Oluf Pedersen; Andrew D Morris; Collin N A Palmer; Sekar Kathiresan; Olle Melander; Peter M Nilsson; Leif C Groop; Inês Barroso; Claudia Langenberg; Nicholas J Wareham; Christopher A O'Callaghan; Anna L Gloyn; David Altshuler; Michael Boehnke; Tanya M Teslovich; Mark I McCarthy; Andrew P Morris
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Prevalence of overweight and obesity in United Arab Emirates Expatriates: the UAE National Diabetes and Lifestyle Study.

Authors:  Nabil Sulaiman; Salah Elbadawi; Amal Hussein; Salah Abusnana; Abdulrazzag Madani; Maisoon Mairghani; Fatheya Alawadi; Ahmad Sulaiman; Paul Zimmet; Oliver Huse; Jonathan Shaw; Anna Peeters
Journal:  Diabetol Metab Syndr       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.320

10.  Reduced Expression of PLCXD3 Associates With Disruption of Glucose Sensing and Insulin Signaling in Pancreatic β-Cells.

Authors:  Hayat Aljaibeji; Debasmita Mukhopadhyay; Abdul Khader Mohammed; Sarah Dhaiban; Mahmood Y Hachim; Noha M Elemam; Nabil Sulaiman; Albert Salehi; Jalal Taneera
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 5.555

View more
  1 in total

1.  Variant-to-gene-mapping analyses reveal a role for pancreatic islet cells in conferring genetic susceptibility to sleep-related traits.

Authors:  Chiara Lasconi; Matthew C Pahl; James A Pippin; Chun Su; Matthew E Johnson; Alessandra Chesi; Keith Boehm; Elisabetta Manduchi; Kristy Ou; Maria L Golson; Andrew D Wells; Klaus H Kaestner; Struan F A Grant
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 6.313

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.