Literature DB >> 32569576

Colorectal cancer screening in the USA in the wake of COVID-19.

Aasma Shaukat1, Timothy Church2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32569576      PMCID: PMC7304951          DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30191-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol


× No keyword cloud information.
In the past two decades, we have made strides to boost colorectal cancer screening in the USA, with screening rates increased to 67% of eligible individuals. Current efforts are directed towards boosting screening rates to 80%. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, primary care visits have decreased substantially, and non-urgent and elective procedures are delayed. Subsequently, in March, 2020, the American Cancer Society recommended that no-one should go to a health-care facility for routine (non-diagnostic) cancer screening until further notification, which restricts the ability to screen average-risk individuals for colorectal cancer using colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy. As a result, screening efforts have largely been suspended and screening rates have plummeted by 86% relative to the average before January, 2020. The USA is not unique in the sharp decrease in colorectal cancer screening; other high-income countries have also reported largely halting their colorectal cancer screening efforts. However, this is where the stories diverge. The USA is an outlier among high-income countries in a couple of ways. First, with a few exceptions, the USA does not have national, regional, or local organised programmes for colorectal cancer screening. Colorectal cancer screening is largely opportunistic—ie, requires a provider visit. Second, colonoscopy is the predominant method of screening, as opposed to tests, such as the faecal immunochemical test (FIT). As we prepare for resumption of clinical services, we must meaningfully address the disparities in delivery and methods of colorectal cancer screening compared with other countries. Health-care systems and health service users should implement an organised, vigorous screening approach, by which we identify those eligible for colorectal cancer screening and reach out to them individually. Models for this approach already exist and have been successful in achieving screening rates of 80% and higher. These approaches can be tailored for the specific population's needs and are also cost-effective. Given that the USA is a patchwork of health-care systems and networks, the first step in this effort is to create local, regional, or statewide registries of individuals eligible for colorectal cancer screening. This endeavour will take enormous upfront effort and public cooperation between providers, non-profit organisations, and governments, but the dividends go far beyond one-time screening: these registries could evolve into living documents accessible by all health-care providers, similar to vaccination registries. In the long-term, this approach would also reduce overscreening. The second crucial aspect to address is flexibility in screening methods. As the COVID-19 pandemic shows, activities that are difficult or inconvenient to do in person can still be done at home. Zoom (Zoom Video Communications, San Francisco, CA, USA) and other video conferencing platforms have been substitutes for unsafe in-person meetings. FIT-like tests have high sensitivity and specificity for detecting colorectal cancer and can be sent directly to patients, done in the safety of their homes, and posted back to the laboratory. With positivity rates of 4–8%, this approach would substantially reduce the number of individuals who must go through the trying task of scheduling and undergoing a colonoscopy, made even more risky by potential exposure to SARS-CoV-2. Approximately 88 million individuals are aged 50–75 years in the USA, at least 29 million of whom were not up to date with their colorectal cancer screening before March, 2020. With screening decreasing by 86%, FIT-like tests could offer a method of triaging this increasing backlog. In the USA we have adapted to newer models of doing business, delivery of education, and health care since the pandemic began. The approaches we suggest here are safe, low cost, readily available, evidence based, and in keeping with guidelines for physical distancing. We believe that organised screening and FIT-like tests are the best path forward for colorectal cancer screening in the wake of COVID-19.
  10 in total

1.  Time to Colonoscopy After Abnormal Stool-Based Screening and Risk for Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality.

Authors:  Yazmin San Miguel; Joshua Demb; Maria Elena Martinez; Samir Gupta; Folasade P May
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Development of a comprehensive measure of organizational readiness (motivation × capacity) for implementation: a study protocol.

Authors:  Timothy J Walker; Heather M Brandt; Abraham Wandersman; Jonathan Scaccia; Andrea Lamont; Lauren Workman; Emanuelle Dias; Pamela M Diamond; Derek W Craig; Maria E Fernandez
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2020-11-11

3.  Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccination in Non-Infected Cardiometabolic Patients from the Americas during the COVID-19 Pandemic. A Sub-Analysis of the CorCOVID-LATAM Study.

Authors:  Álvaro Sosa Liprandi; Ezequiel José Zaidel; Ricardo Lopez Santi; John Jairo Araujo; Manuel Alfonso Baños González; Juan Martín Busso; Luz Cabral; Jorge Camilletti; Juan Erriest; Roberto Flores; Ezequiel Forte; Mirecly Guzman Ramos; Máxima Mendez Castillo; Leonardo Josué Ramírez Zambrano; Carmen Roa; Piero Custodio-Sanchez; Gustavo Solache Ortiz; Bernardo Spitz; Adrián Baranchuk
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-04

4.  Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on gastrointestinal cancer diagnosis and resection: An observational study.

Authors:  Lauren Tal Grinspan; Sheila D Rustgi; Steven H Itzkowitz; Alexandros D Polydorides; Aimee L Lucas
Journal:  Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 3.189

5.  Impact of COVID-19 on the oncological outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery in northern Italy in 2019 and 2020: multicentre comparative cohort study.

Authors:  Matteo Rottoli; Gianluca Pellino; Antonino Spinelli; Maria E Flacco; Lamberto Manzoli; Mario Morino; Salvatore Pucciarelli; Elio Jovine; Moh'd Abu Hilal; Riccardo Rosati; Alessandro Ferrero; Andrea Pietrabissa; Marcello Guaglio; Nicolò de Manzini; Pierluigi Pilati; Elisa Cassinotti; Giusto Pignata; Orlando Goletti; Enrico Opocher; Piergiorgio Danelli; Gianluca Sampietro; Stefano Olmi; Nazario Portolani; Gilberto Poggioli
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2022-01-06

6.  COVID-19 and inequities in colorectal and cervical cancer screening and diagnosis in Washington State.

Authors:  Ofer Amram; Solmaz Amiri; Jeanne Robison; Chaya Mangel Pflugeisen; Pablo Monsivais
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 4.711

Review 7.  Clinical presentation, management, screening and surveillance for colorectal cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Sami Akbulut; Abdirahman Sakulen Hargura; Ibrahim Umar Garzali; Ali Aloun; Cemil Colak
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 1.534

8.  Impact of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias on colorectal cancer screening utilization, knowledge, and associated health disparities.

Authors:  Gang Lv; Xiaoxia Wang; Xiangxiang Jiang; Minghui Li; Kevin Lu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 5.988

9.  Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on colorectal cancer screening in New York City.

Authors:  Briton Lee; Sigrid Young; Renee Williams; Peter S Liang
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 1.687

10.  Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Utilization of EGD and Colonoscopy in the United States: An Analysis of the GIQuIC Registry.

Authors:  Audrey H Calderwood; Michael S Calderwood; J Lucas Williams; Jason A Dominitz
Journal:  Tech Innov Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2021-07-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.