Literature DB >> 32569147

Hearing Preservation With a New Atraumatic Lateral Wall Electrode.

Thomas Lenarz1, Andreas Buechner, Anke Lesinski-Schiedat, Max Timm, Rolf Salcher.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Many individuals have some residual hearing which should be preserved with cochlear implantation. To achieve this goal electrode arrays must fulfil certain design requirements. A new thin lateral wall electrode array (HiFocus SlimJ) was systematically designed on the basis of μCT studies of human cochlea anatomy. The primary objective of this study was to report on initial retrospective hearing preservation results from a cohort of subjects consecutively implanted with this electrode. Secondary objectives were to report on insertion depth and speech perception results for this new array.
METHODS: Twenty subjects with considerable residual hearing in low frequencies were consecutively implanted with the SlimJ electrode array. The electrode was inserted slowly through the round window and the insertion process was controlled by intracochlear electrocochleography measuring cochlear microphonics through the cochlear implant.Postoperative cone beam computed tomography was conducted and precise scalar location and angular insertion depth was estimated following image fusion with the preoperative images.
RESULTS: Low frequency hearing at 1 month postsurgery was preserved within 30 dB HL in 85% of subjects and within 15 dB HL in 50% of subjects. Mean angular insertion depth was 393 degrees (SD 62 degrees) with a range from 294 to 520 degrees. All electrode contacts in all subjects were identified within scala tympani.
CONCLUSION: The SlimJ electrode array is easy to handle for atraumatic insertion through the round window, adjusted insertion depth controlled by electrocochleography measurements, and reliable fixation at the posterior tympanotomy. Hearing preservation rates are encouraging on the short term. We aim to further report on larger data sets and long-term outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32569147     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  9 in total

1.  Early Hearing Preservation Outcomes Following Cochlear Implantation With New Slim Lateral Wall Electrode Using Electrocochleography.

Authors:  Amit Walia; Matthew A Shew; Abhinav Ettyreddy; Shannon M Lefler; Pawina Jiramongkolchai; Cameron C Wick; Nedim Durakovic; Craig A Buchman; Jacques A Herzog
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Relationship Between Intraoperative Electrocochleography and Hearing Preservation.

Authors:  Thomas Lenarz; Andreas Buechner; Bruce Gantz; Marlan Hansen; Viral D Tejani; Robert Labadie; Brendan O'Connell; Craig Alan Buchman; Carla V Valenzuela; Oliver F Adunka; Michael S Harris; William J Riggs; Douglas Fitzpatrick; Kanthaiah Koka
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Access and Polarization Electrode Impedance Changes in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Cochlear Implant Users with Delayed Loss of Acoustic Hearing.

Authors:  Viral D Tejani; Hyejin Yang; Jeong-Seo Kim; Helin Hernandez; Jacob J Oleson; Marlan R Hansen; Bruce J Gantz; Paul J Abbas; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-10-22

4.  One Year Assessment of the Hearing Preservation Potential of the EVO Electrode Array.

Authors:  Nicolas Guevara; Cécile Parietti-Winkler; Benoit Godey; Valerie Franco-Vidal; Dan Gnansia; Marine Ardoint; Michel Hoen; Chadlia Karoui; Eric Truy; Christophe Vincent; Isabelle Mosnier; Yann Nguyen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Increased Threshold and Reduced Firing Rate of Auditory Cortex Neurons after Cochlear Implant Insertion.

Authors:  Elie Partouche; Victor Adenis; Dan Gnansia; Pierre Stahl; Jean-Marc Edeline
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-01-31

6.  Suitable Electrode Choice for Robotic-Assisted Cochlear Implant Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review of Manual Electrode Insertion Adverse Events.

Authors:  Paul Van de Heyning; Peter Roland; Luis Lassaletta; Sumit Agrawal; Marcus Atlas; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner; Kevin Brown; Marco Caversaccio; Stefan Dazert; Wolfgang Gstoettner; Rudolf Hagen; Abdulrahman Hagr; Greg Eigner Jablonski; Mohan Kameswaran; Vladislav Kuzovkov; Martin Leinung; Yongxin Li; Andreas Loth; Astrid Magele; Robert Mlynski; Joachim Mueller; Lorne Parnes; Andreas Radeloff; Chris Raine; Gunesh Rajan; Joachim Schmutzhard; Henryk Skarzynski; Piotr H Skarzynski; Georg Sprinzl; Hinrich Staecker; Timo Stöver; Dayse Tavora-Viera; Vedat Topsakal; Shin-Ichi Usami; Vincent Van Rompaey; Nora M Weiss; Wilhelm Wimmer; Mario Zernotti; Javier Gavilan
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-24

7.  Is Characteristic Frequency Limiting Real-Time Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation?

Authors:  Amit Walia; Matthew A Shew; Shannon M Lefler; Dorina Kallogjeri; Cameron C Wick; Timothy A Holden; Nedim Durakovic; Amanda J Ortmann; Jacques A Herzog; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 5.152

8.  The effect of the surgical approach and cochlear implant electrode on the structural integrity of the cochlea in human temporal bones.

Authors:  Saad Jwair; Huib Versnel; Robert J Stokroos; Hans G X M Thomeer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 9.  Advances in hearing preservation in cochlear implant surgery.

Authors:  Osama Tarabichi; Megan Jensen; Marlan R Hansen
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 1.814

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.